Hortankin Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I can only imagine the comments I'm going to get when I say trading the 5th OA, Virtanen, Markstrom, and Hansen is the best thing for this team and we will still remain competitive. Now before you comment please review the trades lol. TRADE 1: Puljujarvi TO VAN 3rd OA TO CBJ Virtanen Hansen Markstrom 2017 1st (*top 5 protected*) Cbj 2nd (17/18) TRADE 2: Trading down from "5 to 9" TO VAN 9th (Brown) Juulsen 2016 2nd TO MTL 5th (Dubois) IN: Puljujarvi Brown Juulsen 2nd OUT: Virtanen Hansen Markstrom 5TH OA *2017 1st* CBJ 2ND 2016-2017 ROSTER Sedin Sedin UFA Baertschi Horvat Puljujarvi Granlund Sutter UFA Vey Gaunce Etem/Dorsett Edler Tanev Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin Larsson Hamhuis Pedan Miller UFA FUTURE ROSTER: 2020 Granlund Horvat Puljujarvi Baertschi Brown Boeser Sedin Sedin UFA Cassels Gaunce Etem Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin Subban XXXX Tanev Demko Miller Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 So by "Draft Day Proposals", you really mean "15 Days Before my ACTUAL Draft Day Proposals" topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 50 minutes ago, McHortanen said: I can only imagine the comments I'm going to get when I say trading the 5th OA, Virtanen, Markstrom, and Hansen is the best thing for this team and we will still remain competitive. Now before you comment please review the trades lol. TRADE 1: Puljujarvi TO VAN 3rd OA TO CBJ Virtanen Hansen Markstrom 2017 1st (*top 5 protected*) Cbj 2nd (17/18) TRADE 2: Trading down from "5 to 9" TO VAN 9th (Brown) Juulsen 2016 2nd TO MTL 5th (Dubois) IN: Puljujarvi Brown Juulsen 2nd OUT: Virtanen Hansen Markstrom 5TH OA *2017 1st* CBJ 2ND 2016-2017 ROSTER Sedin Sedin UFA Baertschi Horvat Puljujarvi Granlund Sutter UFA Vey Gaunce Etem/Dorsett Edler Tanev Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin Larsson Hamhuis Pedan Miller UFA FUTURE ROSTER: 2020 Granlund Horvat Puljujarvi Baertschi Brown Boeser Sedin Sedin UFA Cassels Gaunce Etem Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin Subban XXXX Tanev Demko Miller Interesting, but switch Virtanen with Baer in trade one. Plus Logan Brown will NOT fall to 9. If we don't stay at five and take him, the Flames will grab him at six. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 lol Grandlund on the first line So basically... - we trade a 2nd a get a 2nd. - Right now there is no guarantee Brown will be better or worse than Virtanen, so that pretty much a wash. - We trade our 2017 1st rounder for another 1st rounder Juulsen. - It comes down to Hansen and Markstrom to move from #5 to #3. The only reason it balances out at the end, is because we overpay for CBS trade and MTL overpays for 5th overall. Just not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I think that is an overpayment for Puljujarvi. That's roughly the equivalent of two top ten 1sts and three 2nds. The MTL trade is lopsided for us. After hearing about some invisibility issues from cdc'ers about Brown, I wouldn't take him, in my opinion he has the biggest bust potential right up there with Chychrun in the top 12. At #9 I would rather Jost/Keller/Sergachev/Nylander. Juulsen was left off your 2020 roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny in Vancouver Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 7 minutes ago, Cowichan Canuck said: I think that is an overpayment for Puljujarvi. That's roughly the equivalent of two top ten 1sts and three 2nds. For probably most other players, I would agree. But Puljujarvi is just amazing. People don't talk about him as much as Matthews and Laine, but based on his performance in different world tournaments, he should be there. YouTube: Jesse Puljujärvi - 2015 IIHF WJC Highlights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsMillerTime Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 Impressive, but no (wait for it)...Finnish. Im very familiar with what Puljujarvi brings. If he was a center with that drive/skill then yes I would be more inclined to make that trade. He has a heart of gold, but shows some signs of having hands of stone. Those highlights reminded me a bit of Hansen to be honest. Yes I know he is 16 in that video. Even if I didn't see one point in that video of roughly 30 shots, it was the most impressive non scoring highlight reel I've seen in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 If I was Winnipeg, I would be making a trade with CBJ to get the #3. Laine and Puljujarvi's differences are very complimentary of each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I don't see Montreal paying last years first round selection plus 39th overall to move up 4 spots. I guess it depends on how badly they want Dubois, but that seems like a big overpayment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I like the idea. Jake does make sense in that we're trading a winger to draft a winger.. I would think that if CBJ wants to trade that pick they would want a centre. the deal probably starts with Horvat. Whether it's worth it or not I dunno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 I think that CBJ deal would require us taking Bobrovsky's contract back our way too. So it would have to be: TRADE 1: Puljujarvi TO VAN 3rd OA Bobrovski's 7.5 mil cap hit - so no UFAs this year - unless we trade Miller... but imagine being stuck with 13.5 mil in a Bobrovkski-Miller tandem TO CBJ Virtanen Hansen Markstrom 2017 1st (*top 5 protected*) Cbj 2nd (17/18) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowichan Canuck Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 So now two 1st's, three 2nds, and a $7.5 cap hit for Bobrosky until the end of the 2019 season killing the chances of FA's? NOT WORTH IT!!! How is this even plausible? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted June 9, 2016 Share Posted June 9, 2016 5 hours ago, Monty said: So by "Draft Day Proposals", you really mean "15 Days Before my ACTUAL Draft Day Proposals" topic. naww I think he means 350 days after it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble 6 Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 I like the idea of going for Pulujaarvi. I think him and Horvat would be an amazing duo. I would rather trade Baertschi than Virtanen, although I'm not sure if that will get it done. Maybe instead of Virtanen we could give up Baertschi and Pedan to your proposed trade? Also, if we somehow acquire the 3rd overall pick without giving up our 5th overall, I think we should keep both the high picks. That could build us 2/3 of our top line moving forward. Taking Pulujaarvi and Tkachuk/Dubois would drastically improve our situation moving forward: Tkachuk - Horvat - Pulujaarvi Baertschi - ________ - Boeser Gaunce - Granlund - Etem or _______ - Horvat - Pulujaarvi Baertschi - Dubois - Boeser Gaunce - Granlund - Etem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted June 10, 2016 Share Posted June 10, 2016 12 hours ago, ItsMillerTime said: Lol Just this, that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 If there is a chance to draft one of the Finns, what do you think the Canucks need to give up to move from 5th to third? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GettinGuddyWithIt Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpt Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 To be honest it probably would've been McCann and our 5th. Unless we are putting in Virtanen I doubt we can offer anything that Columbus wants Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.