Odd. Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Landeskog would be my target. What would we give up? Tanev, a pick (1-3 rounder), maybe CBJ's 2nd rounder, and a B level prospect (Brisebois), possibly more? I honestly don't know the value of Landeskog but be prepared to see Tanev go if we're ever trading with Colorado. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny in Vancouver Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 4 minutes ago, Kenny Powers said: Demers signed in FLA - Sbisa trade value goes up a little With the many D-men we currently have, I would love to see Sbisa go in exchange for this gritty forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Tanev is our best dman and after the hall trade it just put a higher price tag on right shot top 4 defenseman, does landeskog have higher value than hall? Does larsson value that much higher than tanev? To col: tanev, 2nd pick 2017 to van: landeskog Landeskog would be our nucleus player for the next generation, the guy we need to build around up front with horvat, virtanen and boeser riding shot gun. He's the complete package, but of course our d has a hole. So the canucks would need to look into a russell, polak, or schenn to off set the loss for a year just until we can find a better option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 If JB can make it happen.........Chris Kreider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Lasso Posted July 2, 2016 Author Share Posted July 2, 2016 24 minutes ago, billabong said: Tanev is our best dman and after the hall trade it just put a higher price tag on right shot top 4 defenseman, does landeskog have higher value than hall? Does larsson value that much higher than tanev? To col: tanev, 2nd pick 2017 to van: landeskog Landeskog would be our nucleus player for the next generation, the guy we need to build around up front with horvat, virtanen and boeser riding shot gun. He's the complete package, but of course our d has a hole. So the canucks would need to look into a russell, polak, or schenn to off set the loss for a year just until we can find a better option. I'm a big fan of Tanev, but would be thrilled with this trade. Gudbranson could take the right side on our top pair. UFA backfill for line 2, then Larsen/Tryamkin on the third pair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocksterh8 Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 1 hour ago, Kenny Powers said: thanks - I'm intrigued. So so far, Kane, Landeskog and Hartnell as possibilities. Hartnell would have been good except it would not work now because of his NMC that would mean 4 forwards with NMC, and vegas would get a very good player then. not gonna happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurt Nirvanagut Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 1 hour ago, Jaku said: Hard pass on Evander Kane, he's cancer in the dressing room. That will only cause more problems than solve. Landeskog would certainly be a player to look into. Considering you have been in many a locker room with Evander Kane, I will take your word as gospel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurt Nirvanagut Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 59 minutes ago, vinny_in_vancouver said: With the many D-men we currently have, I would love to see Sbisa go in exchange for this gritty forward. Sbisa couldn't even fetch you Jimmy Hayes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny in Vancouver Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 1 minute ago, zzbottom said: Sbisa couldn't even fetch you Jimmy Hayes. See that's exactly what I thought at the end of last season. Until I saw all of the money thrown at non-superstar D-men and a guy like Larsson fetch a potential star forward like Hall, that is. It made me realize that the serviceable D-men's value is actually a lot higher than what I expected. In fact, it made me feel even better about getting Juolevi. With expansion coming soon, there will be teams that will need to get rid of players. Sbisa could have some value there as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 43 minutes ago, billabong said: Tanev is our best dman and after the hall trade it just put a higher price tag on right shot top 4 defenseman, does landeskog have higher value than hall? Does larsson value that much higher than tanev? To col: tanev, 2nd pick 2017 to van: landeskog Landeskog would be our nucleus player for the next generation, the guy we need to build around up front with horvat, virtanen and boeser riding shot gun. He's the complete package, but of course our d has a hole. So the canucks would need to look into a russell, polak, or schenn to off set the loss for a year just until we can find a better option. Tanev and Granlund for Landeskog Daniel - Henrik - Eriksson Landeskog - Horvat - Rodin Beartschi - Sutter - Hansen Etem - Gaunce - Dorsett Edler - Gudbranson Hutton - Larsen Sbisa - Tryamkin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harvey Spector Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 2 hours ago, Dral said: The hall trade wasn't fair.... Life isn't fair really... just sayin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 4 minutes ago, Trebreh said: Tanev and Granlund for Landeskog Daniel - Henrik - Eriksson Landeskog - Horvat - Rodin Beartschi - Sutter - Hansen Etem - Gaunce - Dorsett Edler - Gudbranson Hutton - Larsen Sbisa - Tryamkin The defense... Umm... Your just asking for a bottom five pick. I like it. We would score but we'd get scored against a lot. A good team in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harvey Spector Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 2 hours ago, ShakyWalton said: So Matt Martin was available...what happened there. I think JB is looking for a Brouwer type who can kill penalties as well as play a top 9 role. That's not Matt Martin... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Colorado needs LD more than right D, so unless they move Barrie how does Sbisa, Gaunce, and a top 10-15 protected 1st for Landeskog sound? Kane would come much cheaper right now, but Landy would be a better guy to have in the room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harvey Spector Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Evander Kane would be the best and cheapest option right now. Unless he is a mass murderer I don't see how he will be able to unsettle a dressing room full of leaders like the Sedins and Gudbranson. He took on Petrovic and beat him 3 times but I am sure he had no intention of ever dropping them with Guds that game. Trust me Guds will have a nice little talk with him and all will be real gud... Maybe some home cooked meals will make him feel better. Just make sure that the bouncers at the Roxy don't allow him in and we should be okay... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 2 minutes ago, Stamkos said: The defense... Umm... Your just asking for a bottom five pick. I like it. We would score but we'd get scored against a lot. A good team in the future. The main point is we get another "foundational" peice for the rebuild while being entertaining lol. oh and the defence you dont know how they'll perform until they actually play. we could get great seasons from them or not haha. Dallas' defence and questionable goaltending got them to the 2nd round. I cant deal with the boring hockey we saw last season. as long as we have solid goaltending and out score our problems its all good to me, if we make the playoffs thats bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 1 minute ago, Trebreh said: The main point is we get another "foundational" peice for the rebuild while being entertaining lol. oh and the defence you dont know how they'll perform until they actually play. we could get great seasons from them or not haha. Dallas' defence and questionable goaltending got them to the 2nd round. I cant deal with the boring hockey we saw last season. as long as we have solid goaltending and out score our problems its all good to me, if we make the playoffs thats bonus. When landescog is in his prime... Ooh! I just got chills! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Just now, Stamkos said: When landescog is in his prime... Ooh! I just got chills! He is not your prototypical Swede too, he plays like a Canadian. He fought Shea Weber! Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Just now, Trebreh said: He is not your prototypical Swede too, he plays like a Canadian. He fought Shea Weber! Lol Make it happen GMJB! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted July 2, 2016 Share Posted July 2, 2016 Just now, Stamkos said: Make it happen GMJB! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.