Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Signing] Flames sign Matthew Tkachuk [3 year ELC]


Recommended Posts

Doubt he makes the Flames' team this year.  It will be interesting to see how he produces in the OHL without Marner and Dvorak. 

 

However, if Marner ends up back in the OHL with Tkachuk and Juolevi, they would be the early favorites for a Memorial Cup repeat.

 

Also good chance we see Tkachuk/Boeser on USA's first line at the WJHC.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, timberz21 said:

Doubt he makes the Flames' team this year.  It will be interesting to see how he produces in the OHL without Marner and Dvorak. 

 

However, if Marner ends up back in the OHL with Tkachuk and Juolevi, they would be the early favorites for a Memorial Cup repeat.

 

 

 

I agree. Hopefully Juolevi chooses to go back to the OHL instead of playing in Europe. I think another year in such a strong development program and another Memorial Cup run would benefit his development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Roger Neilson's Towel said:

 

I agree. Hopefully Juolevi chooses to go back to the OHL instead of playing in Europe. I think another year in such a strong development program and another Memorial Cup run would benefit his development.

There is also the AHL option which will be interesting.  Apparently he's eligible because he's on loan to London and not actually obligated to play in the OHL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, wai_lai416 said:

Tkachuk will be a good player for the Flames playing along side Gudreau Bennette and Monahan. Just hope it doesn't come back and bite as in the ass by passing up on bpa

By claiming Tkachuk to be the best player available at the time, that's really more of an opinion than it is a fact. It really depends on who you talk to, whether it's Central Scouting or whether it's another scouting firm. If you're basing it on Central Scouting, know that that's only 1 firm and not the end all for saying someone's the bpa. Furthermore, GM's all have their own systems and lists as well as the media.

 

Just wanted to point that out. I think claiming that Tkachuk was the bpa at that time isn't really all that accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was never really sold on Tkachuk. It was either Dubois for me or trade down.. If we had drafted Tkachuk I wouldn't have been mad, but certainly not thrilled. Couldn't be happier drafting Juolevi though. 

 

One thing can be mentioned for both Juolevi and Tkachuk is that will they be able to carry the workload for London next year with the departures of Marner and Dvorak? Tkachuk especially. I really want to see how well he does now that the TDM line is most gone. I doubt Marner goes back for another year. 

3 minutes ago, timberz21 said:

There is also the AHL option which will be interesting.  Apparently he's eligible because he's on loan to London and not actually obligated to play in the OHL.

Nope, that report was actually not true. Linden confirmed its either NHL or CHL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, timberz21 said:

There is also the AHL option which will be interesting.  Apparently he's eligible because he's on loan to London and not actually obligated to play in the OHL.

I had heard that, but I still think another year with the London Knights would be better for his development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lock said:

By claiming Tkachuk to be the best player available at the time, that's really more of an opinion than it is a fact. It really depends on who you talk to, whether it's Central Scouting or whether it's another scouting firm. If you're basing it on Central Scouting, know that that's only 1 firm and not the end all for saying someone's the bpa. Furthermore, GM's all have their own systems and lists as well as the media.

 

Just wanted to point that out. I think claiming that Tkachuk was the bpa at that time isn't really all that accurate.

let's just say majority of the people let it be analyst or websites or whatever scouting they use have Tkachuk average ranked #4-5 and Juolevi ranked 6-7.. if our defense prospect pool isn't as weak as it was.. i'm sure we would not have taken Juolevi as we easily could have trade down a couple spot and still gotten him..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • b3. changed the title to [Signing] Flames sign Matthew Tkachuk [3 year ELC]

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...