Relyt Krets Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Gunna keep this short and sweet. Colorado And Van... You already know where this is going Van Gets : Landeskog and Barrie Col gets: Tanev, Hansen, 2017 1st, 2018 2nd and a prospect. This trade would only make us better and actually give more direction of this team. Crazy I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 If that prospect is Virtanen, Boeser, Juolevi, etc. then it's not so crazy. Otherwise the Avs laugh and hang up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Oh it's unthinkable alright. Unthinkable in the sense that Colorado doesn't even think about doing this for a second. Barrie >> Tanev Landeskog >>>>>Hansen 2017 1st probably isn't Top 15 if this deal is made. 2018 2nd value is microscopic. That prospect would have to be one of Juolevi, Boeser, or Demko to just get the conversation started. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GettinGuddyWithIt Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 It seems like it's fair value but I'll pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 Can't believe many of guys really think Barrie is worth all that? Colorado fans will HAPPILY take a defensive defenseman that clearly has no defensive deficiencies over a liability in Barrie. I know if we had Barrie and was looking to trade him, I'd trade for Tanev straight up and not look twice at the trade again. Colorado need to get the puck out of their net, and Tanev would be a significant improvement. Maybe not offensively, though he has upside, his defensive game is what will make him flourish. Tanev is the definition of what all teams want in a defensive defenseman. Only down to his game is that he's not entirely physical but that's probably it. Legitmate top 3 shutdown defenseman. Tanev is worth more than the possible market value he's currently at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 While I don't think as highly of Tanev as other people on these boards, I'd still rather have him over Barrie. Call it the unthinkable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 way to high a price for us at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted July 8, 2016 Share Posted July 8, 2016 That's not as unthinkable as one might believe, but doubtful Joe does little more than entertainment Jim's phone call and say no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underrated Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Obviously my idea is crazy and the Sedins wouldn't waive their NTC's, but hypothetically speaking I'm curious if the Avs would do a trade of the Sedins and Edler for Landeskog, Duchene and Barrie. I doubt they would cause of age, but if they felt like their core could compete for a cup in the next few years then maybe they would? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
insomniac604 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 lololol.. although.. I might be willing to give up, say, Baertschi in this deal to save a pick. Boeser, Virtanen, Demko and Horvat are here to stay. The one catch is that Barrie is not signed, so that can easily bring the terms down to a Beartschi level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 On 08/07/2016 at 2:44 AM, Blue Jay 22 said: Oh it's unthinkable alright. Unthinkable in the sense that Colorado doesn't even think about doing this for a second. Barrie >> Tanev Landeskog >>>>>Hansen 2017 1st probably isn't Top 15 if this deal is made. 2018 2nd value is microscopic. That prospect would have to be one of Juolevi, Boeser, or Demko to just get the conversation started. Markstrom instead of Demko? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 Just now, McHortanen said: Markstrom instead of Demko? Nope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hortankin Posted July 11, 2016 Share Posted July 11, 2016 I'd be tempted if Markstrom shows improvment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted July 12, 2016 Share Posted July 12, 2016 When I read unthinkable, any trade involving Colorado has already been debated for weeks....so technically that's thought of. Unthinkable would be a trade proposal involving Brad Marchant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted July 13, 2016 Share Posted July 13, 2016 I guess if you think about the value of a top-4 let alone a top-2 defenceman, that alone is a future/current top-6 forward PLUS a good pick. A top-4 winger alone would cost a top-4 defenceman. Landeskog could probably cost Tanev straight up to be fair considering the Hall for Larsson trade. Larsson is not a flashy top pairing defenceman similar to Tanev but a bit better. Hall is a top-5 winger in the NHL and a lot better than Landeskog, so the way I see it Tanev for Landeskog is pretty much a saw-off. Barrie will be tricky though and to be honest probably costs us something like Virtanen/Horvat/Boeser + 1st or 2nd round pick at the least. That's a lot, but Barrie's commanding a lot around the league. I'd be happy to sit with our team as is at the moment, but if we're to trade Tanev we need a top-4 Dman back, and if we're trading a forward we need to hang onto our centers. I'd do something like this: Tanev + Hansen + Virtanen for Barrie + Landeskog If they want, give them a 2nd or 3rd rounder too. Virtanen will be a solid top-6 powerforward but Landeskog is that already. Plus we've got Boeser about a year away from the NHL with not much room to squeak in. Tanev has a few years left of playing decent shutdown defence but Barrie is arguably one of the best puck movers in the game today. With Gudbranson, Sbisa and Tryamkin, JB may think we have our shutdown guys. Sedin - Sedin - Eriksson Baertschi - Horvat - Landeskog Etem - Sutter - Rodin Gaunce - Granlund - Burrows Dorsett Edler - Barrie Hutton - Gudbranson Sbisa - Larsen Tryamkin That's a very deadly top-6 all of a sudden and finally our defence has the perfect split of puck movers to shutdown defencemen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.