smithers joe Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 i doubt anything would get done because everyones opinions are different...would we take everyone's opinions, go by majority rules, or just fight forever...we would have trouble getting other teams to trade us the players we want for higgins and sbisa...dumb teams... what might this team look like? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 We'd be bankrupt within 3 seasons, the roster will have changed at LEAST 150 times, Every time a player goes a single game without putting up a point he's traded for whichever flavour of the week put up a hat trick the night before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 Oh yeah, and we'd change logos every six weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNeil Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 Players would be traded every few weeks, with players staying a full year being a rarity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 we would all take turns having our own favourite songs as the opening theme, call up all the young guys, waive all the old guys, trade for stamkos, beer at rogers arena will literally cost and arm and a leg-- just because, there are no such thing as no trade clauses, some people will straight up tell the players that they're all expendable, and if they arent scoring every night, yer outta here. i won't do that though. i should be the emperor of making all of the decisions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richado Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 Our draft research would consist of finding the 'best dangles' in prospects' youtube highlight reels. We would piss off every GM by repeatedly offering them our current equivalent of Raymond+Ballard+1st for every good player that becomes available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 I think the irony is that the roster would look very similar to what it looks like now. Because when CDC people find out what the players they want to get rid of are REALLY worth, they'll choose to keep them. We'd never agree to do a full rebuild, so we'd never trade away any of our valuable veterans. Boeser would be playing with the Sedins this year, Virtanen would be playing with Baertschi and Horvat instead of in Utica like he probably will unless he has a great camp. We'd need like 35 roster spots on the NHL team, because guys like Brendan Gaunce would be on the team, but we wouldn't trade guys like Burrows, Hansen etc... because they aren't worth what it is thought they are worth on these forums. Something like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted July 31, 2016 Author Share Posted July 31, 2016 some fun thoughts....maybe we should keep our day jobs or stay in school... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 two words FREE BEER!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milk and honey Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 if cdc ran the canucks then I am sure a bunch of people from hfboard would come and troll us. especially the user "jetshomer" lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putgolzin Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 we'd be caught in an eternal struggle between two simultaneously self-cancelling processes. opposing factions would try to simultaneously do a full rebuild and try to make the playoffs every year (cause hey, once you're in you never know what could happen!). which is to say, we would be exactly the same as we currently are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanGnome Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 1 hour ago, Chris said: We'd be bankrupt within 3 seasons, the roster will have changed at LEAST 150 times, Every time a player goes a single game without putting up a point he's traded for whichever flavour of the week put up a hat trick the night before. With the eventual end of the team when all 50 contracts end up being traded for draft picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Neilsons Towel Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 1 hour ago, Chris said: We'd be bankrupt within 3 seasons, the roster will have changed at LEAST 150 times, Every time a player goes a single game without putting up a point he's traded for whichever flavour of the week put up a hat trick the night before. 1 hour ago, richado said: Our draft research would consist of finding the 'best dangles' in prospects' youtube highlight reels. We would piss off every GM by repeatedly offering them our current equivalent of Raymond+Ballard+1st for every good player that becomes available. Accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asian player Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 Our draft interviews would rely heavily on facial expressions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 Meet the new Coach Green...ie the Green men will coach our team! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HC20.0 Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 We trade every veteran on the team for picks. Then we make a blockbuster. Edler for Raymond, Ballard, and a 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaku Posted July 31, 2016 Share Posted July 31, 2016 CDC would have annoyed the Predators with Ballard Raymond and a 2nd for Shea Weber until it happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted July 31, 2016 Author Share Posted July 31, 2016 37 minutes ago, asian player said: Our draft interviews would rely heavily on facial expressions. or if they have cute wives and girlfriend... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimberWolf Posted August 1, 2016 Share Posted August 1, 2016 We'd trade all those useless 2nd, third and fourth round picks for guaranteed bottom six plugs because of the percentage chance they have of making the NHL while keeping the 5th and on picks cause Detroit. We also keep the first pick to to draft a rookie for use in a trade for a player that'll help us immediately. We'd move and 18/19 year olds for 24 plus "stopgaps" unless they knocked their rookie year out of the park, even then we'd keep those rookies in the bottom six till they are thirty. Then we'd sign 30 plus year old UFA's to retirement deals that can't be bought out or traded. Best part is we can repeat the process indefinitely while claiming that injuries hurt us and there are no quick fixes (while attempting to fix quickly). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.