orcasgonewild Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 Lets make this quick... Canucks. Detroit. Nyquist. Edler 2nd 2017 If buffalo gets vesey: Canucks. Buffalo Kane. Miller (bcuz lehner has. injury problems) Conditional 3rd round pick 2017 Canucks. Leafs Jvr. Cassels Etem Sbisa 2nd 2018 Canucks. Wild Dumba. Hansen Pedan 3rd 2018 Sedins eriksson Kane sutter jvr Baertschi horvat nyquist Gaunce granlund rodin Hutton tanev dumba gudbranson Tryamkin larsen Marky Random backup lol Reasons (if you care): First trade was all about giving detroit a defensemen since they have to many forwards. You may not agree but I think its even. 2nd trade was done only if sabres get vesey otherwise i doubt its in the realm of happening. Plus robin lehner usually gets injured and miller loves buffalo so why not play his last year there. 3rd trade This is a long shot and it was just meant to put up jvr as a trade target. I think hes great and in the trade i sent over young players to help in torontos rebuild. It wouldnt happen but to add jvr would be great bcuz he checks all JBs boxes. Give me some suggestions in this one. 4th trade Canucks replace edler with dumba, since he doesnt look like he'll be saved in an expansion draft. I sent over hansen to improve their offense and pedan to give them that extra defensemen. Plus minny has a couple good d prospects that make dumba expendable. Well cdc i hope u agree with some of my ideas maybe not necessarily the players in the trades but the concept of building a powerhouse. Anyways id love to hear your suggestions, and have a great day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleedblue2017 Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 The first trade may work, but I would be uneasy about giving up Edler without getting another D in return (although Nyqvist is great) The second and third trades, I just don't think any GM would agree to those, I think that the second trade would for sure benefit BUF, Kane is way to much drama. The third pick TOR would want half our team for JVR. The fourth I think is probably the most realistic, I could actually see that one happening with a 2nd pic as opposed to the 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted August 16, 2016 Author Share Posted August 16, 2016 1 minute ago, bleedblue2017 said: The first trade may work, but I would be uneasy about giving up Edler without getting another D in return (although Nyqvist is great) The second and third trades, I just don't think any GM would agree to those, I think that the second trade would for sure benefit BUF, Kane is way to much drama. The third pick TOR would want half our team for JVR. The fourth I think is probably the most realistic, I could actually see that one happening with a 2nd pic as opposed to the 3rd. Thankyou for your comment. And i totally agree, getting jvr would take a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bleedblue2017 Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 1 minute ago, orcasgonewild said: Thankyou for your comment. And i totally agree, getting jvr would take a lot. JVR would be great with LW: Baertchi C: Horvat RW: JVR Sick line, tones of speed and skill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 Edler says NO and we are only looking for a scoring winger! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 Tag your thread before a mod locks it for not having one. Also, your second proposal is ridiculous. Even the reasoning behind it fails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted August 16, 2016 Share Posted August 16, 2016 The Wild are extremely high on Dumba. He's got the best shot from the point and is a RHD. He's likely their 3rd D to be protected after Sutter and Spurgeon. They are willing to trade him if he brings back a top-6 C but certainly not for Hansen. They were going to do Dumba for RNH but the Oilers wanted an add (rumoured to be either a 2nd or 3rd round pick) and the Wild declined because they felt one-for-one was sufficient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.