Bure_Pavel Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 To Van: Krejci To Bos: Edler Boston has Bergeron and Backes as their top 2 centers and there has been rumors they have looked at moving Krejci. Although it would leave a hole on defence it would help solve our scoring woes and give guys like Pedan a better shot at making the team. This hole can probably be filled next year by Juolevi as well. Sedins- Hansen Eriksson- Krejci - Sutter Baertchi- Horvat- Etem Burrows- Granlund- Dorsett Hutton-Tanev Tryamkin- Gudbranson Sbisa- Pedan/Larsen Biega Miller Markstrom Although the D core is inexperienced and a little on the weak side I think their are some young D propects who could challenge for a roster spot and it would make for an exciting brand of hockey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bur14Kes17 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Until we get at least half way through the season and see what more we have in Hutton and Tryamkin there's no way we should trade Edler. Remember how the Oilers tried making Schultz a 1st pairing d man like straight out of college? Let's not ruin Hutton like that. And what has Tryamkin done that you think he can play 2nd pairing minutes for his 1st NHL season??? Go ahead and trade Edler at the deadline sure, but not before then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 8 minutes ago, Bur14Kes17 said: Until we get at least half way through the season and see what more we have in Hutton and Tryamkin there's no way we should trade Edler. Remember how the Oilers tried making Schultz a 1st pairing d man like straight out of college? Let's not ruin Hutton like that. And what has Tryamkin done that you think he can play 2nd pairing minutes for his 1st NHL season??? Go ahead and trade Edler at the deadline sure, but not before then I think you're absolutely right, but I can see how it's also possible. Hutton-Gudbranson Tryamkin-Tanev Sbisa-Larsen Pedan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_Pavel Posted August 28, 2016 Author Share Posted August 28, 2016 5 minutes ago, Bur14Kes17 said: Until we get at least half way through the season and see what more we have in Hutton and Tryamkin there's no way we should trade Edler. Remember how the Oilers tried making Schultz a 1st pairing d man like straight out of college? Let's not ruin Hutton like that. And what has Tryamkin done that you think he can play 2nd pairing minutes for his 1st NHL season??? Go ahead and trade Edler at the deadline sure, but not before then Ya I hear ya there is a lot of uncertainty if they did a trade like this it might be a good idea to grab a veteren d-man through another trade to help take some of the pressure off the young guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick_fan Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 If they did this trade, I can see GMJB going after Seidenberg to replace Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 The one time we get some good defense everyone wants to trade the #1 dman on the team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_Pavel Posted August 28, 2016 Author Share Posted August 28, 2016 7 minutes ago, Stamkos said: The one time we get some good defense everyone wants to trade the #1 dman on the team When was the last time we had a legit second line, at least juolevi will be able to help fill the gap in a couple of years. When Hank retire there will be a massive gap at center that we won't be able to fill for years, without selling the farm. It's pretty much just shifting the glaring hole for now not fixing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 I like it we need secondary scoring bad. And platoon on D will replace Eddie's minutes. btw Hutton>Shultze Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 I would like Krejci, but I am worried about his health. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuckles80 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 1 hour ago, thejazz97 said: I think you're absolutely right, but I can see how it's also possible. Hutton-Gudbranson Tryamkin-Tanev Sbisa-Larsen Pedan That 'looks good on paper' but is full of assumptions which I think is the concern with moving edler 1. Assumes Hutton takes a big leap - its hard enough just to improve on his last year and show he can be a solid top 4 but asking him to now be a top pairing dman is quite alot, even with Gud as his partner. That now means shutting down players like Kopitar, Pavelski, Gaudreau, Mcjesus on a regular basis and playing huge minutes- I think its alot to ask at this stage of his career and could easily lead to busting him. It would also likely lead to a decrease in his offensive output as his focus would turn to his own end as he's learning to cope with dealing with a higher quality of competition. 2. Same on Tryamkin to a lesser degree. We've only seen him for what 8 games? I love what he brought as a player, a huge (no pun intended) addition to our back end and he could become a force for us, but expecting him to jump into a 3/4 role is quite an expectation even with Tanev on his side. 3. Take both of those issues and now couple it with an injury to Tanev or Gud or either of Hutton or Tryamkin and what happens to our depth? We're toast! And injuries always happen we know that! I think we're a year away from moving Edler. And it would make more sense next year as the following year he's a UFA. You trade him at the deadline to a cup contender for a first and prospect next year. By that time Hutton and Tryamkin have hopefully made the strides they needed to show they can move up the roster, and hopefully players like Stecher, Juolevi, Subban and Pedan show that they can provide the depth we need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canada Hockey Place Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Sutter + Sbisa for Krejci would be ideal. IMO bundling Sutter, Sbisa, Dorsett, any non-prospect players signed by Benning for a C upgrade would be a smart pre-expansion move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Pass. No interest in 5 more years of Krejci at 7.25 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John McClane Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Did the Canucks sign Rodin to sharpen skates? I've noticed that a lot of cdc'ers leave him out of there lineups. (Just asking. Not trying too ruffle any feathers.) Back on topic, I do kind of like this trade proposal. But I'm not sure Boston would be high on Edlers list to wave his ntc for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 No we don't need Krejci. Doesn't really fit what Benning is looking for anyways. And we should not be trading Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 I see it's been mentioned, but no thanks based on Krejci's contract alone. He's 30 and 5 more years doesn't do us many favours when we'll have the Sedins for two more years plus possibly an extension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longsuffering Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 5 hours ago, Bure_Pavel said: To Van: Krejci To Bos: Edler Boston has Bergeron and Backes as their top 2 centers and there has been rumors they have looked at moving Krejci. Although it would leave a hole on defence it would help solve our scoring woes and give guys like Pedan a better shot at making the team. This hole can probably be filled next year by Juolevi as well. Sedins- Hansen Eriksson- Krejci - Sutter Baertchi- Horvat- Etem Burrows- Granlund- Dorsett Hutton-Tanev Tryamkin- Gudbranson Sbisa- Pedan/Larsen Biega Miller Markstrom Although the D core is inexperienced and a little on the weak side I think their are some young D propects who could challenge for a roster spot and it would make for an exciting brand of hockey. what's the source for the rumour about Krejci leaving Boston anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted August 28, 2016 Share Posted August 28, 2016 Edler wants to stay but I think it would be a good trade for both if possible but not so much for us for the future unless we want to trade the twins end of season at the draft!!!We could then put Sutter with the twins and Eriksson with Krejci.They would have to eat 2 mill a season for this to work!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABNuck Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 4 hours ago, John McClane said: Did the Canucks sign Rodin to sharpen skates? I've noticed that a lot of cdc'ers leave him out of there lineups. (Just asking. Not trying too ruffle any feathers.) Back on topic, I do kind of like this trade proposal. But I'm not sure Boston would be high on Edlers list to wave his ntc for. Exactly!! ANY deal that involves an upgrade at F had better have a plan to somehow deal one off as well...we're not carrying 15 F and only 6 D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuckles80 Posted August 29, 2016 Share Posted August 29, 2016 5 hours ago, longsuffering said: what's the source for the rumour about Krejci leaving Boston anyway? it worked on nhl16 be a gm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure_Pavel Posted August 29, 2016 Author Share Posted August 29, 2016 6 hours ago, longsuffering said: what's the source for the rumour about Krejci leaving Boston anyway? More speculation than anything but there is a few articles on it, and makes sense with Backes and Bergeron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.