AriGold Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Thoughts ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 An American publication thinking they know hockey........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Hard to argue with their "semi-science". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Just now, MJDDawg said: Hard to argue with their "semi-science". Well, it is American, so they base it half on science, but then dismiss that completely in favour of God and Puxatony Phil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Last eh... that means we pick third! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShakyWalton Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 They have us as the worst team in the league? We arent going to win the Presidents Cup but I honestly think we will do alot better than that..some of the teams they have ahead of us is a joke...everyone has projections..means nada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Woohoo -- last place in the league, and by a good chunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cramarossa Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 How are we projected to earn 10 points fewer than last year with a (*knocks on wood*) healthier team, a proven goal scorer in Eriksson, and stronger D-corps? I don't know that we'll win the Cup but we aren't slouches either. Sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Just now, ThrustyPrusty89 said: How are we projected to earn 10 points fewer than last year with a (*knocks on wood*) healthier team, a proven goal scorer in Eriksson, and stronger D-corps? I don't know that we'll win the Cup but we aren't slouches either. Sheesh. 'Murica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cramarossa Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Just now, PhillipBlunt said: 'Murica. But, but, I'm from America and even I can see this is BS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Feels like they made their picks on a 'flavour of the month' basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Just now, ThrustyPrusty89 said: But, but, I'm from America and even I can see this is BS! Well, consider yourself one of the lucky ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimberWolf Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 Curious as to what system the used to come up with these results. Was it anything scientific or just a water cooler conversation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 1 minute ago, Master Mind said: Feels like they made their picks on a 'flavour of the month' basis. ... hilary or trump? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 1 minute ago, TimberWolf said: Curious as to what system the used to come up with these results. Was it anything scientific or just a water cooler conversation? Scientific water coolers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 4 minutes ago, Gooseberries said: ... hilary or trump? Garrison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rollieo Del Fuego Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 That's all the ref's have allotted us this year... ...we need to take a ref. out to dinner or something...get at least one of them to be at least neutral.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 And the trend of predicting AHLbertan style failure for the canucks continues.. Im not expecting much this season, but a few things bother me about these rankings 1) The lames getting 99 points. Their bottom 2 lines are not very good, and that run and gun defence they spent the bank building is pourous like swiss cheese. I doubt an above average goalie takes them from bottom of the barrel to top of the barrel, especially if lil hockey gnome holds out for 8 million dollars to pay for limb lengthening surgery. 2) Coilers, in essence, swap Hall for Lucic, add Larsson and a rookie Pool Party, and jump 12 points? Yeah, sure. 2) Canucks finish with around 10 less points than last year despite improving the D and getting key players back healthy. Not likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 7 minutes ago, Rollieo Del Fuego said: That's all the ref's have allotted us this year... ...we need to take a ref. out to dinner or something...get at least one of them to be at least neutral.... Good idea. Take them out for a nice dinner and then fit them with some nice shoes, preferably cement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cramarossa Posted October 4, 2016 Share Posted October 4, 2016 7 minutes ago, Darius71 said: I doubt an above average goalie takes them from bottom of the barrel to top of the barrel, especially if lil hockey gnome holds out for 8 million dollars to pay for limb lengthening surgery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.