Fred65 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I don't know who runs this board. But it sure has heck seems to be directed by Vcr management either directly or by rules laid out by management. twice I've tried to make comments about Vcr trading away Forsling and twice it's been locked. I'm thinking number 3 will be coming up. Pointless making comments if they all have to be team positive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TU90 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 This is canucks.com, so it's probably a safe bet to assume Canucks management runs and pays for this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kakanucks Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Or your posts just plain SUCK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnLocke Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 6 minutes ago, Fred65 said: I'm thinking number 3 will be coming up Oh I'm sure of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Mandate to stop the growing negativity surrounding the incompetence of owners and management. Only positive comment regarding some of horrible hockey decisions are allowed. Like how tickets are 20 bucks now great job Jim. Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 3 minutes ago, Fred65 said: I don't know who runs this board. But it sure has heck seems to be directed by Vcr management either directly or by rules laid out by management. twice I've tried to make comments about Vcr trading away Forsling and twice it's been locked. I'm thinking number 3 will be coming up. Pointless making comments if they all have to be team positive What are you gaining from posting about forsling and Glendening? Yes we know we should have kept forsling or have gotten more for him. Yes we know Clendening is the 6th dman on NYR weak ass d core. Move on like everyone else. LET IT GO MAN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred65 Posted October 14, 2016 Author Share Posted October 14, 2016 4 minutes ago, TU90 said: This is canucks.com, so it's probably a safe bet to assume Canucks management runs and pays for this board. Too much to ask for independence when commenting rather than the need to toe some imaginary line ...oh well back to the salt mines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 there are existing posts on those topics seems to me you are getting shut down for duplicating them i have not noticed too much of a pro management bent on here in terms of disallowing topics i know i have read too much already on forsling unhappiness by cdc so i know these topics already exist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred65 Posted October 14, 2016 Author Share Posted October 14, 2016 1 minute ago, Gooseberries said: What are you gaining from posting about forsling and Glendening? Yes we know we should have kept forsling or have gotten more for him. Yes we know Clendening is the 6th dman on NYR weak ass d core. Move on like everyone else. LET IT GO MAN. Well IMO as much as most fans like to constantly heap unwarranted praise .... to me it stands to reason that while gloating on the good things we should balance that with some of the failings....... any harm in that. Life would be boring if we all had to constantly praise each and every aspect of the Canucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butters Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 why are you claiming censorship when its just a duplicate topic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaramel MacKhiato Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 New drinking game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 13 minutes ago, Fred65 said: I don't know who runs this board. But it sure has heck seems to be directed by Vcr management either directly or by rules laid out by management. twice I've tried to make comments about Vcr trading away Forsling and twice it's been locked. I'm thinking number 3 will be coming up. Pointless making comments if they all have to be team positive -Those players aren't Canucks property and hence not relevant to Canucks talk. -There's already numerous threads elsewhere commenting on those players and management. Hence, your thread is redundant. -I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest they likely also lacked substance. Three reasons why your threads were locked. Have a nice ban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Benning discusses Forsling in yesterdays interview with Bmac on 1040.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred65 Posted October 14, 2016 Author Share Posted October 14, 2016 Just now, J.R. said: -Those players aren't Canucks property and hence not relevant to Canucks talk. -There's already numerous threads elsewhere commenting on those players and management. Hence, your thread is redundant. -I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest they likely also lacked substance. Three reasons why your threads were locked. Have a nice ban. Wow you actually believe that. A decision that may have a sizeable impact on the teams future is not open to discussion. Seems narrow sighted to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoseTruckWasIt Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 IIIIT GET SHUT DOWN. EFF U. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fred65 Posted October 14, 2016 Author Share Posted October 14, 2016 2 minutes ago, Honky Cat said: Benning discusses Forsling in yesterdays interview with Bmac on 1040.. Thks I was on the road yesterday driving in from Wyoming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lillooet_Hillbilly Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 WELL IN MY OWN OPINION pancakes are a better weapon of choice then a waffle. sure waffles can hide syrup in their pockets and more effective in close range combat but pancakes are more long range/ faster to re-supply and generally easier to equip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Just now, Fred65 said: Wow you actually believe that. A decision that may have a sizeable impact on the teams future is not open to discussion. Seems narrow sighted to me Believe what? That you're not following clearly stated posting guidelines? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoseTruckWasIt Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 13 minutes ago, Fred65 said: Too much to ask for independence when commenting rather than the need to toe some imaginary line ...oh well back to the salt mines Yeah, you're a real Martin Luther King. Go suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerridwen Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 5 minutes ago, butters said: why are you claiming censorship when its just a duplicate topic? ^^^^ This Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.