Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 User Actions Follow Pittsburgh PenguinsVerified account@penguins The #Pens have re-signed goalie Matt Murray (@mattmurray_30) to a three-year contract extension. Details: http://pens.pe/2eUQ3E3 Quote The Pittsburgh Penguins have re-signed goalie Matt Murray to a three-year contract extension, it was announced today by executive vice president and general manager Jim Rutherford. The deal begins with the 2017-18 season and runs through the 2019-20 campaign, and it carries an average annual value of $3.75 million. Pierre LeBrun @Real_ESPNLeBrun 9m9 minutes ago Further to @TSNBobMcKenzie, Matt Murray's new contract with the Penguins will be for three years and $3.75 million per season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Trade coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sedintwinpowersactivate Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 $3.75 million? Isn't that what we are paying Sbisa? Good signing for the Pens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Marc-Andre Fleury to Kings trade rumours increase..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 21 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Marc-Andre Fleury to Kings trade rumours increase..... Not when he's still got 3 years at 5 million +. it is still only 2 games in for him but IF Elliot doesn't improve. Calgary might be willing to ante up to pay the price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoseTruckWasIt Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Anyone in the market for an older goalie with a bloated contract has a tonne of options, and a tonne of leverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 9 minutes ago, WhoseTruckWasIt said: Anyone in the market for an older goalie with a bloated contract has a tonne of options, and a tonne of leverage. Another goalie option for Toronto? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoseTruckWasIt Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Just now, Gooseberries said: Another goalie option for Toronto? If they are serious about winning, which I doubt, they should work on Bishop. Also, Howard would be good insurance and could come with a sweetener. Toronto is in a strong position with some excess prospects, so they should be able to deal. Fragile Fleury, however, definitely seems like the wrong guy for the market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 1 hour ago, Sedintwinpowersactivate said: $3.75 million? Isn't that what we are paying Sbisa? Good signing for the Pens. Sbisa is a much better defenseman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'NucK™ Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Or they're just doing exactly what we did this past summer with Markstrom? Of course the likelihood of a trade goes up if 2 G on the team are being paid ~10M, but just like with us, don't think it warrants reading into much more than that. I'm guessing the asks LA is hearing right now are ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 With a strong team upfront, I wouldn't put it past either Winnipeg or Ottawa making a pitch for Marc Andre. The goalies they have now are meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 6 minutes ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said: With a strong team upfront, I wouldn't put it past either Winnipeg or Ottawa making a pitch for Marc Andre. The goalies they have now are meh. Ottawa has Anderson but yea, I could see those two as being good fits. Arizona as well could probably make it work too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 2 hours ago, 'NucK™ said: Or they're just doing exactly what we did this past summer with Markstrom? Of course the likelihood of a trade goes up if 2 G on the team are being paid ~10M, but just like with us, don't think it warrants reading into much more than that. I'm guessing the asks LA is hearing right now are ridiculous. But if fleury isn't moved before the expansion draft they lose Murray. I cant see them just gifting him to the new team. One of those goalies will be traded (not necessarily right away) , it's a luongo/schnieder situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
'NucK™ Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 8 minutes ago, coryberg said: But if fleury isn't moved before the expansion draft they lose Murray. I cant see them just gifting him to the new team. One of those goalies will be traded (not necessarily right away) , it's a luongo/schnieder situation. Ah right, forgot about the draft. Works out much better for us with Miller going into FA. Do you think they are more likely to move Fleury or Murray though? Probably more demand for Fleury but are they ready to have Murray as their starter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 17 minutes ago, 'NucK™ said: Ah right, forgot about the draft. Works out much better for us with Miller going into FA. Do you think they are more likely to move Fleury or Murray though? Probably more demand for Fleury but are they ready to have Murray as their starter? I think they would love to move MAF but the return is low and the deal would be hard to make with the NMC. They may have to cut losses and trade Murray for futures (sound familiar?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.