Sedin Brothers Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 There's still plenty of unrest regarding the future of Colorado and whether Landeskog, who has produced immensely since being drafted should be Captain or Nathan McKinnon. Simply put, it depends on what you value right now compared to later, and what you think the Avs captain Landeskog (23) brings towards the future compared to Virtanen. Van gets: Gabriel Landeskog Col gets: Virtanen Tryamkin 2nd 3rd Haven't checked the salary cap or anything, but I wouldn't be against adding Sven if we needed to throw a contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Yes. But that deal wouldn't cut it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Obviously, but Colorado laughs at that deal and hangs up. If we are serious about Landeskog, then kiss Tanev good bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drsofthands Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 virtanen is probably worth a second at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustABandwagoner Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 11 minutes ago, Blue Jay 22 said: Obviously, but Colorado laughs at that deal and hangs up. If we are serious about Landeskog, then kiss Tanev good bye. I can see them requiring an overpayment like Tanev Virtanen 1st So no thanks LOL. Rather just tank if we are really that bad. I know people will hate me for this but whatever.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Landeskog would be a player I could consider moving Virtanen for. It would really depend on the total package going back. It would take more than what you offered Landeskog would shore up our top 6 wingers for the foreseeable future. Even after we lose the twins we’d still look strong. Landeskog and Baertschi as our top 6 LW. Eriksson and Boeser on the right wing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdubuya Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 I never really understood why Colorado is so keen on trading their captain and recent 2nd overall pick? CDC and Vancouver media sure seems keen tho... hmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neversummer Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Anyday .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaintPatrick33 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Any Landeskog/Duchene trade speculation should be thrown out the window now that Roy is no longer head coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Anyone who says no to that question should lose all credibility in their ability to talk hockey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Landeskog-Horvat-Boeser That looks like a real top line, so yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 55 minutes ago, Blue Jay 22 said: Obviously, but Colorado laughs at that deal and hangs up. If we are serious about Landeskog, then kiss Tanev good bye. Does having Juolevi and Stecher make that OK though? If OJ puts on some weight and Stecher continues to improve... maybe its worth it. We have to get a real top line from somewhere and whats the point of developing an excess of D if you don't use it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 1 hour ago, Sedin Brothers said: There's still plenty of unrest regarding the future of Colorado and whether Landeskog, who has produced immensely since being drafted should be Captain or Nathan McKinnon. Simply put, it depends on what you value right now compared to later, and what you think the Avs captain Landeskog (23) brings towards the future compared to Virtanen. Van gets: Gabriel Landeskog Col gets: Virtanen Tryamkin 2nd 3rd Haven't checked the salary cap or anything, but I wouldn't be against adding Sven if we needed to throw a contract. While i would include Virt in a trade for GL any day (and i have nothing against Virt aside from him not being quite ready for the NHL yet). Colorado on the other hand would not even respond to that deal proposed and I highly doubt anyone has any interest in Virt now for anything more than a late 2nd or 3rd round pick. To get GL youre going to lose Tanev and Boeser and most likely a 1st round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 1 hour ago, Sedin Brothers said: There's still plenty of unrest regarding the future of Colorado and whether Landeskog, who has produced immensely since being drafted should be Captain or Nathan McKinnon. Simply put, it depends on what you value right now compared to later, and what you think the Avs captain Landeskog (23) brings towards the future compared to Virtanen. Van gets: Gabriel Landeskog Col gets: Virtanen Tryamkin 2nd 3rd Haven't checked the salary cap or anything, but I wouldn't be against adding Sven if we needed to throw a contract. No, Alf is off of Landeskog since learning about his concussion history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down by the River Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 If Colorado trades Landeskog for a young forward on the Canucks, its either Bo or Boeser. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bur14Kes17 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 We've already got no real forward depth as it is. If our lineup is completely healthy, I like our team chances no a nightly basis. But with a few injuries, now look at us.... we need to jut stay the course and build through the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 To COL: Tanev and Virtanen To VAN: Landeskog and a 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beeekz37 Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 Would love to have Landeskog for any foreseeable future, but as others have pointed out, it will take more than Virt, Trym and a couple picks to get him. Tanev would be gone for sure, don't think we would throw in Boeser, but stranger things have happened. Tanev Hansen (very attractive contract) Virtanen 3rd Might get it done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 1 hour ago, S'all Good Man said: Does having Juolevi and Stecher make that OK though? If OJ puts on some weight and Stecher continues to improve... maybe its worth it. We have to get a real top line from somewhere and whats the point of developing an excess of D if you don't use it? No, not at all. If anything we need to draft another RHD before we get to the deep rounds next year. Look what happened last year when Tanev was our only capable RHD. Stecher (or Larsson) at the very least need to be sheltered for a year or two before we can roll them out as legit all situation D. Trade Tanev now and we're back to just Gudbranson to handle the back end side of things. It will set us back years. Stay the course. We do need Ericsson to surface. While we wait for Boeser if Bo, Jake and Baer all develop? Then we're on our way! . If they're not quite up to it? A very real possibility... Then we get another top 5 pick. And we should get another Landeskog without setting ourselves backwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blömqvist Posted October 26, 2016 Share Posted October 26, 2016 COL: Tanev and Baertschi VAN: Landeskog and a 3rd Daniel - Henrik - Eriksson Granlund - Sutter - Hansen Landeskog - Horvat - Rodin Skille - Gaunce - Dorsett Burrows Edler - Tryamkin Hutton - Gudbranson Sbisa - Larsen Miller/Markstrom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.