Pears Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 1 minute ago, Alflives said: I agree. Keep the Twins, Bo, Sutter, Stecher, Gudbranson, and Hutton. Trade the rest for picks - Prospects. Pretty much that group along with the future core. Everyone else should be on the block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 Just now, Pears said: Pretty much that group along with the future core. Everyone else should be on the block. TO and Edmonton are both fun teams to watch now. Edmonton took forever to get to this point, but the Leafs did this in only a couple years of Shanahan's management group. We need to rip it back to the studs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 57 minutes ago, Alflives said: the Leafs did this in only a couple years of Shanahan's management group. We need to rip it back to the studs. Missing the post-season 10 of the past 11 seasons helped TO get where they are right now as well. we've only missed 4 playoffs out of the past 15 seasons , we've had it reasonably good for the past decade and a half if you think about it. Are we Chi , no. But we've certainly been far better than Edm /Cgy /To . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 2 minutes ago, PlanB said: Missing the post-season 10 of the past 11 seasons helped TO get where they are right now as well. we've only missed 4 playoffs out of the past 15 seasons , we've had it reasonably good for the past decade and a half if you think about it. Are we Chi , no. But we've certainly been far better than Edm /Cgy /To . Sorry PB, but most people here don't care about the past decade - you're dealing with a bunch of "whadda u done for me lately " people. In their minds ( not mine mind you ) losing streak means get rid of everyone except Hutton, Boeser and Demko. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 11 minutes ago, PlanB said: Missing the post-season 10 of the past 11 seasons helped TO get where they are right now as well. we've only missed 4 playoffs out of the past 15 seasons , we've had it reasonably good for the past decade and a half if you think about it. Are we Chi , no. But we've certainly been far better than Edm /Cgy /To . 10.5/11*. Remember they only made it in a half season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 We are a bunch of schmucks watching the games from our couches and we know sbisa isnt a top 4 dman, what makes anyone think Montreal can be duped by a) taking him and his contract and b ) parting with a good young player for him? The offence on the Canucks is treacherous. One way to fast track the rebuild of the O is to trade a good asset on Defence. That guy, in my mind, would be Tanev. We dont know if Stecher can replace him, at this point, but it may be worth the gamble if you can get a proven top 6 forward back - not a Baertschi like project, not a guy we hope pans out in 3 years, a proven guy that is under 25. I dont know enough about Montreal to know who would be expendable from their roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 1 hour ago, PlanB said: Missing the post-season 10 of the past 11 seasons helped TO get where they are right now as well. we've only missed 4 playoffs out of the past 15 seasons , we've had it reasonably good for the past decade and a half if you think about it. Are we Chi , no. But we've certainly been far better than Edm /Cgy /To . Shanahan has been there only three seasons. The previous years the Leafs were trying the model JB is currently using. I really believe some fans of our team are afraid of the proper rebuild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 They have Weber and Petry on the right side already. It has to be a left sided D they are looking for. Edler would be a good a fit. The minutes won't be a problem. Weber probably plays a couple of mins more per game but you Edler can be rested on the PP and the minutes would be much easier when you're not defending the whole time. In terms of the cap they will need to send some back. I'm not sure about their prospects situation. But all this don't matter if Benning (or realistically the owners) don't embrace the rebuild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 "Edler would be a good a fit. ' NTC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted October 30, 2016 Share Posted October 30, 2016 3 hours ago, gurn said: "Edler would be a good a fit. ' NTC. What about it? I'm talking about whether he would be fit a their team and not whether he would waive his NTC. He has every right to not do so. Many players have waived. Should we exclude all players with nmc/ntc from trade discussions now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I honestly believe that JB has built enough depth on D, that they could afford to move Edler and tanev at some point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 I think Edler for De La Rose and a 1st likely in the 20-30 range would be a fair deal. Edler Weber would be formidable 2 huge shots and I think the opportunity to play second fiddle to Weber would be incentive enough for him to waive and get out of this fishbowl. Talent Analysis De La Rose's defensive-minded style of hockey has earned him time with the Canadiens, appearing in 33 games last season and playing on a line with Lars Eller, in a shut-down role with the team. While he's not the fastest skater on the team, he's very mobile and fluid, with an excellent pivot that allows him to cover a large part of the ice. His ability to read a play and cut off passing lanes is top-notch. There's not much production value to De La Rose's style, but that is primarily based on his deployment in defensive-zone starts and being faced with tough assignments as a 19-year-old. Future De La Rose was expected to challenge for a spot with the Canadiens in training camp after playing key minutes for Montreal during the 2015 playoffs. Instead, he opened the 2015-16 season with AHL affiliate St. John's before eventually being recalled in January 2015. Capable of playing on the wing and at center, de la Rose has an advanced understanding of the defensive game for a player his age. He should slot into either a third or fourth line role for Montreal and should begin to contribute offensively as he gains more experience. Read more at http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/jacob-de-la-rose/#2w3ufDd5vgWIR0bg.99 Scouting Report Assets: Has a very projectable frame and some two-way upside. Works hard, is versatile enough to play both center and wing, is aggressive in the corners and can also produce points. Flaws: The jury is still out on his ability to produce points at the highest level. Also, he could stand to get physically stronger in order to maximize output in North America. Career Potential: Versatile forward with a little upside. Next seasons Lineup Sedinz Hansen Baer Bo Boeser Granlund Sutter Rodin Gaunce De La Rose Virtanen The way I see it 2x middle of the pack 1st lines one 2nd line and a 3rd De La Rose is the perfect line mate for Virtanen and Gaunce to become a skilled and stiff 3rd line to play against and give other teams top lines fits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 9 hours ago, Darius71 said: We are a bunch of schmucks watching the games from our couches and we know sbisa isnt a top 4 dman, what makes anyone think Montreal can be duped by a) taking him and his contract and b ) parting with a good young player for him? Well, the organization did trade for Scott Gomez I know different GM?management etc but that's a historic blunder to be tagged to a franchise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 7 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Well, the organization did trade for Scott Gomez I know different GM?management etc but that's a historic blunder to be tagged to a franchise The Habs, as stated by Elliot Friedman during HNIC, are looking for a top four Dman to take minutes from Shea Weber. They would want Tanev, who plays the right side. Sbisa plays the left side. Tanev for ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 27 minutes ago, Alflives said: The Habs, as stated by Elliot Friedman during HNIC, are looking for a top four Dman to take minutes from Shea Weber. They would want Tanev, who plays the right side. Sbisa plays the left side. Tanev for ? Shea plays right side why would they want Tanev when Edler makes them a double threat for that blast. with everyone covering Weber Edler could work that shot like a boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
niknuk85 Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 22 hours ago, Fanuck said: I don't disagree with you. But McCarron fits JB's description of a rugged, versatile, gritty scoring forward to perfection. Surly JB could turn around and pick up a useful stop-gap defenceman with Edlers vacated salary. I am not familiar with McCarron but even if he just has hockey gear I would move edler for him or any other warm body for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 McCarron doesn't bring anything we don't already have in our forward group other than maybe size. We need dynamic offensive players IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 hutton for gallager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 2 hours ago, DeNiro said: McCarron doesn't bring anything we don't already have in our forward group other than maybe size. We need dynamic offensive players IMO. To a point you might be right. Really you are. Its not a simple answer though. A Dave Andreychuck never hurt any team he was on. McCarron is a bit like that? Always attracted attention in front of the net. Big ass & soft hands. Which created space for the type of skill player you speak of. And also had a knack for tapping in those skill players shots, burying their rebounds. Even snapping in the odd shot himself from further out than 15 feet? Its worth remembering, we currently don't have a single 200lb top 6 forward either. A good player who cannot be stopped because he is a physical handful? Might be just as handy as a good player who is hard to stop because he has wicked agility??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rattler Posted October 31, 2016 Share Posted October 31, 2016 On 10/29/2016 at 10:09 PM, Trebreh said: Sbisa and Larsen as a package for for McCarron to make room for Tryamkin and Stetcher. I guess this is our new best offer since we no longer have Ballard and Raymond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.