Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

(Proposal) EDM - ANA


Noble 6

Recommended Posts

To EDM:

 

Fowler

 

To ANA:

 

Nugent-Hopkins

 

Reasons for Edmonton:

 

The Oilers add a young, puck moving defensman on the left side in Fowler. Their D-core, which is their most glaring weakness, is greatly improved. Suddenly, Fowler and Larsson makes their defense respectable. All they need is some defensive help behind McDavid's scoring, and they are set up very well. This also lets them send down Nurse to the AHL for some further refinement in his decision making:

 

Fowler - Larsson

Klefbom - Russell

Sekera - Gryba

 

Reasons for Anaheim:

 

The Ducks add some scoring punch and skill to their lineup for a hopeful playoff push this year. Their top-3 centers are Getzlaf, Nugent-Hopkins and Kesler. They trade Fowler to avoid losing him for nothing in expansion, while simultaneously creating room for Theodore to slot into the lineup. This improves their forward core now, and their defense in the future:

 

Ritchie - Getzlaf - Perry

Rakell - Nugent-Hopkins - Silfverberg

Cogliano - Kesler - Wagner

Garbutt - Vermett - Thompson

 

Thoughts?

 

Edit: This is assuming that Anaheim can get rid of Stoner or Bieksa to make room for Nugent-Hopkins. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anaheim has an internal budget and they are way too close to the cap already.  

Also Rakell can play C so they don't necessarily need RNH.  In the playoffs Boudreau went with Getzlaf, Rakell/Perry and Kesler on 3 different lines.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Blue Jay 22 said:

Money wise, it doesn't work for Anaheim.

This proposal was made assuming that Anaheim could get rid of Stoner or Bieksa. I should've included that in the original post. My bad. 

 

3 minutes ago, mll said:

Anaheim has an internal budget and they are way too close to the cap already.  

Also Rakell can play C so they don't necessarily need RNH.  In the playoffs Boudreau went with Getzlaf, Rakell/Perry and Kesler on 3 different lines.

That strategy makes sense, but it didn't work. They will probably need some more firepower to make it through the the western conference if they want to go on a Cup run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Horvat is a Boss said:

This proposal was made assuming that Anaheim could get rid of Stoner or Bieksa. I should've included that in the original post. My bad. 

 

That strategy makes sense, but it didn't work. They will probably need some more firepower to make it through the the western conference if they want to go on a Cup run. 

 

Rakell is back this week.  Looks like they are easing him in.  According to Eric Stephens - he is skating at C with Vermette and Wagner on his wings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mll said:

 

Rakell is back this week.  Looks like they are easing him in.  According to Eric Stephens - he is skating at C with Vermette and Wagner on his wings.

They might want some extra firepower at the deadline. But a big part of the proposal is Anaheim getting assets back for one of their defensman, as opposed to losing him for nothing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...