orcasgonewild Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 We need a top left winger and I think if our team continues its path we could draft nolan patrick! So we still need a number 1 lw. So this is a summer deal of we get patrick... TO CHICAGO TANEV 2ND TO CANUCKS PANARIN REASON: it's obvious that we need forward help and STECHER CAN REPLACE TANEV! LINEUP PANARIN PATRICK BOESER SEDINS HANSEN BAERTSCHI HORVAT ERIKSSON GRANLUND SUTTER GAUNCE EDLER STECHER HUTTON GUDBRANSON JUOLEVI SBISA/tryamkin ...Dare I say, PLAN THE PARADE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 and Chicago does this why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Would love to have Panarin for sure but Tanev & a 2nd comes no where close to landing him. Change that 2nd to a first and add a boeser/OJ/Demko along with Tanev and you may get bowmans ear for a couple min Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted November 3, 2016 Author Share Posted November 3, 2016 They can't afford panarin and they have players that have emerged. Plus tanev kieth pairing come on LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted November 3, 2016 Author Share Posted November 3, 2016 Just now, Ronaldoescobar said: Would love to have Panarin for sure but Tanev & a 2nd comes no where close to landing him. Change that 2nd to a first and add a boeser/OJ/Demko along with Tanev and you may get bowmans ear for a couple min No wayyyyyyy bro if a top 4 defenseman in Larsen can get a number one LW IN hall than A top 2 defenseman in tanev can get a 70 point player benefiting from one of the league's best players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fakename70 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 4 minutes ago, Silky mitts said: and Chicago does this why? Because this is CDC; Where Logic Goes To Die Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neversummer Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Tanev for Hall ... oooops, missed that boat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted November 3, 2016 Author Share Posted November 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, Fakename70 said: Because this is CDC; Where Logic Goes To Die I agree 100% lol. This is just something for me to do tbh... My prof can't work the computer rn LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 6 minutes ago, orcasgonewild said: No wayyyyyyy bro if a top 4 defenseman in Larsen can get a number one LW IN hall than A top 2 defenseman in tanev can get a 70 point player benefiting from one of the league's best players. No. Again, this one off trade did not set the market also Tanev is older and not as good as Larsen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 BECAUSE PEOPLE TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY WHEN YOU PUT THINGS IN ALL CAPS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted November 3, 2016 Author Share Posted November 3, 2016 Just now, Ronaldoescobar said: No. Again, this one off trade did not set the market also Tanev is older and not as good as Larsen. He's two years older and I Have to repectfully disagreewith that. Tanev a beast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Just now, orcasgonewild said: He's two years older and I Have to repectfully disagreewith that. Tanev a beast. Absolutely fair enough that you disagree. For the record I do like Tanev a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fakename70 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 2 minutes ago, HerrDrFunk said: BECAUSE PEOPLE TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY WHEN YOU PUT THINGS IN ALL CAPS. MY EARS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted November 3, 2016 Author Share Posted November 3, 2016 1 minute ago, Ronaldoescobar said: Absolutely fair enough that you disagree. For the record I do like Tanev a lot. Yes he's pretty good. Very underrated. 1 minute ago, Fakename70 said: MY EARS! Hahahahahaha so witty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 No player on the Canucks, plus their 2nd round pick would land Panarin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrible.dee Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 NO! take that guy away from his organization and he'll turn into a pumpkin in 5 minuetes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 1 hour ago, orcasgonewild said: Yes he's pretty good. Very underrated. ... Strangely enough, so is Larsson. In fact, way more so than Tanev on these boards. But even still that doesn't make a single deal a marker for every subsequent similar deal. Even if Chicago is forced to move Panarin due to cap, they'll likely get better offers than ours. He'll get a big raise but I think they can fit him in, and that's still with Seabrook and Hjalmarsson as right side D on their roster (with Van Reimsdyk behind them) which is why they probably don't need Tanev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted November 3, 2016 Share Posted November 3, 2016 Please remember to tag your thread next time or it will be locked. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.