*Buzzsaw* Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 These boards have been more bi-polar than usual this season, for good reason, the ups and the downs have been kinda steep. I think what we are seeing is the evolution and re-structuring of the team... right before our eyes. The new players spent last season watching and waiting for the Sedins to win games... players like Horvat did chip in, but it was secondary scoring. This year we are seeing a new trend... that being the new players leading the team, not looking to the Sedins anymore, going out and winning games on their own. Arizona game was the best example we've seen this year... the Sedins were generally invisible and didn't figure in the scoring at all. To all intents and purposes, the Horvat line was the #1 line, the Granlund line was #2. No knee-jerk bandwagoneers... that doesn't mean we should send the Sedins to Utica... But it is a good trend. The Sedins will remain a big offensive part of this team, and we will need to get big games from them to have any chance of reaching the playoffs. But now the team has evolved to the point that if Horvat and Baertschi have a good game, the Canucks stand a good chance of winning. The team is becoming offensively balanced again... which hasn't been the case since Kesler's line was capable of winning games on its own. If the trend continues, it is going to make it a lot more difficult for other teams to match lines against the Canucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FijianCanuck Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 If the canucks can put together a 5 game win streak and continue to get points from anyone not a Sedin then I'll be on your page. Beating the last place team twice doesn't change a thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qwags Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 hour ago, FijianCanuck said: If the canucks can put together a 5 game win streak and continue to get points from anyone not a Sedin then I'll be on your page. Beating the last place team twice doesn't change a thing. True, but we did look better last game against the Coyotes then we did the first game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FijianCanuck Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 2 minutes ago, Qwags said: True, but we did look better last game against the Coyotes then we did the first game. True, we finally had bounces go our way and Mike Smith did say he was asleep on all 4 goals. Don't get me wrong I want my team to succeed but I need to see a much bigger sample size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattrek Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 game does not a trend make. Especially if the game is against the last place team in the league with a goalie that decided to $&!# the bed. Yes, it's a positive sign, but let's not pop the champagne yet. If this starts to happen against teams like the Canadiens or Blackhawks consistently then I'll be on board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 It was good to see Bo's line scoring off the rush against Arizona. But then, Arizona is also at the bottom of the league these days. As the season has gone on Bo has been given more and more ice time. Which is also good to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danjr Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Yea how bout lets see when the Horvat line has to face the best D pairing and best checking forwards. Then hopefully the Sedins can finally feast on the lesser d pairings and worse forward lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocksterh8 Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 5 hours ago, *Buzzsaw* said: These boards have been more bi-polar than usual this season, for good reason, the ups and the downs have been kinda steep. I think what we are seeing is the evolution and re-structuring of the team... right before our eyes. The new players spent last season watching and waiting for the Sedins to win games... players like Horvat did chip in, but it was secondary scoring. This year we are seeing a new trend... that being the new players leading the team, not looking to the Sedins anymore, going out and winning games on their own. Arizona game was the best example we've seen this year... the Sedins were generally invisible and didn't figure in the scoring at all. To all intents and purposes, the Horvat line was the #1 line, the Granlund line was #2. No knee-jerk bandwagoneers... that doesn't mean we should send the Sedins to Utica... But it is a good trend. The Sedins will remain a big offensive part of this team, and we will need to get big games from them to have any chance of reaching the playoffs. But now the team has evolved to the point that if Horvat and Baertschi have a good game, the Canucks stand a good chance of winning. The team is becoming offensively balanced again... which hasn't been the case since Kesler's line was capable of winning games on its own. If the trend continues, it is going to make it a lot more difficult for other teams to match lines against the Canucks. It's one game. A little anxious aren't we. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 6 hours ago, *Buzzsaw* said: These boards have been more bi-polar than usual this season, for good reason, the ups and the downs have been kinda steep. I think what we are seeing is the evolution and re-structuring of the team... right before our eyes. The new players spent last season watching and waiting for the Sedins to win games... players like Horvat did chip in, but it was secondary scoring. This year we are seeing a new trend... that being the new players leading the team, not looking to the Sedins anymore, going out and winning games on their own. Arizona game was the best example we've seen this year... the Sedins were generally invisible and didn't figure in the scoring at all. To all intents and purposes, the Horvat line was the #1 line, the Granlund line was #2. No knee-jerk bandwagoneers... that doesn't mean we should send the Sedins to Utica... But it is a good trend. The Sedins will remain a big offensive part of this team, and we will need to get big games from them to have any chance of reaching the playoffs. But now the team has evolved to the point that if Horvat and Baertschi have a good game, the Canucks stand a good chance of winning. The team is becoming offensively balanced again... which hasn't been the case since Kesler's line was capable of winning games on its own. If the trend continues, it is going to make it a lot more difficult for other teams to match lines against the Canucks. They also learned how to give up a three goal lead against the Blackhawks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toyotasfan Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Secondary scoring opens the ice up for everyone. The Sedins still draw the top checkers , someone else has to step up. Horvat's line is getting going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 46 minutes ago, smokes said: They also learned how to give up a three goal lead against the Blackhawks. But they were competitive until they hit the 3rd period when the Blackhawks went into overdrive. It's a long season, but there is some positives. If the team can get secondary scoring, and the defence tightens up, they can at least be pushing to get goals and wins. Be entertaining, even with losses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 49 minutes ago, smokes said: They also learned how to give up a three goal lead against the Blackhawks. You need to give credit where credit is due the Hawks played the perfect period and I am not sure any team could have survived that barrage they showed that night. That was one of the best periods I seen a team play in a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said: But they were competitive until they hit the 3rd period when the Blackhawks went into overdrive. It's a long season, but there is some positives. If the team can get secondary scoring, and the defence tightens up, they can at least be pushing to get goals and wins. Be entertaining, even with losses. Yeh but the notion that the new core won without the help of the old core is nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, EdgarM said: You need to give credit where credit is due the Hawks played the perfect period and I am not sure any team could have survived that barrage they showed that night. That was one of the best periods I seen a team play in a long time. The Canucks also panicked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 1 minute ago, smokes said: The Canucks also panicked You are correct and that is with the "old core" as well. The rookies looked like rookies and will learn from that experience I am sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, EdgarM said: You are correct and that is with the "old core" as well. The rookies looked like rookies and will learn from that experience I am sure. I know, I'm just tired of hearing so many people dismissing the veterans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 I hear you but the thing is that our veterans are in a transition period in which they no longer dominate as they once did. Great in the locker room but on the ice these young guys are much faster and stronger overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CeeBee51 Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 8 minutes ago, smokes said: I know, I'm just tired of hearing so many people dismissing the veterans. Veterans= old toy from Xmas past Young players = new toy this Xmas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, CeeBee51 said: Veterans= old toy from Xmas past Young players = new toy this Xmas they are called people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CeeBee51 Posted November 25, 2016 Share Posted November 25, 2016 Just now, smokes said: they are called people Lots of kids on this site I think. They might understand the toy analogy better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.