Green Building Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 22 minutes ago, Setyoureyesontheprize said: Reminds me too much of EDLER *SHUDDERS* The 18 year old kid who hasn't even played an NHL game yet reminds you of Edler? C'mon Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianRugby Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 12 minutes ago, Dr. Crossbar said: One great big festering neon distraction, I've a suggestion to keep us all occupied. Learn to swim! I grew up on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Just now, CanadianRugby said: I grew up on this. Canucks need to swim!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 21 minutes ago, sonoman said: Not too many complaining about the "non-call" icing on Stars first goal? folks here prefer self-hating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Bo now has more points than Hank or Daniel Another lame performance by Sutter and LE When your top forwards fail to produce , your team usually does not win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 22 minutes ago, sonoman said: Not too many complaining about the "non-call" icing on Stars first goal? It was brought up, as well as the concurrent too many men on the ice. John Garrett made a specific point of the three missed calls in that second period after the intermission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Unfortunately I didn't get to watch it and forgot to set the pvr. Sounds like it was a pretty good game overall. Who looked good, who was invisible, etc. Any of you super smart people want to give me the coles notes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 So far it sounds like Edler was terrible. Which in CDC speak usually means he had an average game lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neko Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 That non call on icing and too many men really turned the tables around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 Ok so far I have: - Edler is actually a Bettman plant to ensure we don't win a cup - linesmen are both blind and stupid - ref is stupid and blind too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 5 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: So far it sounds like Edler was terrible. Which in CDC speak usually means he had an average game lol Edler was just Edlerish with his shots. Canucks played very well -- speed on the counter-attack, aggressive on the forecheck, especially in the first, but were the better team overall on the night. Dallas never really "ramped it up" for any sustained time. The goals on Miller were a deflection and a screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainhorvat Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 1 hour ago, Riviera82 said: He doesn't have to try. I really hope they get rid of this guy by deadline. Hes not a big loss in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 14 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: So far it sounds like Edler was terrible. Which in CDC speak usually means he had an average game lol He did have an average game. Not terrible but not great either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tavrohorvat53 Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 20 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: Unfortunately I didn't get to watch it and forgot to set the pvr. Sounds like it was a pretty good game overall. Who looked good, who was invisible, etc. Any of you super smart people want to give me the coles notes? Great 1st period by the boys after withstanding DAL pressure the first few minutes. We were playing a tight checking game, not giving DAL much time to execute plays. We continued getting shots and good traffic to the net for most of the period. Could've had 2 or 3 goals. But you know the lack of finish.. 2nd period started turning pucks over, our transition game was horrid and couple of terrible non icing calls turned the momentum which we never got back. Megna, Erikson, Burr, sutter, sedan had good games. Stecher, Tryamkin had solid games. Edler was edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 So how would the play tonight compare to the play against Chicago in the first two periods of that game? Same kind of high aggression in all zones? I was pretty stoked to see that style of play both offensively and defensively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 6 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: So how would the play tonight compare to the play against Chicago in the first two periods of that game? Same kind of high aggression in all zones? I was pretty stoked to see that style of play both offensively and defensively. Was similar, but not as intense. Definitely looked faster than the Stars -- counter-attacked with speed, caused turnovers in their zone by being aggressive, etc. Of course, when the Sedin line came out it was like a respite, as the Stars were able to catch up to and neutralize them much of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tavrohorvat53 Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 5 minutes ago, wallstreetamigo said: So how would the play tonight compare to the play against Chicago in the first two periods of that game? Same kind of high aggression in all zones? I was pretty stoked to see that style of play both offensively and defensively. Yeah there was great support along the walls, active sticks in lanes, quick ups and confident plays for the first period. Details were good for 1st period and there was a quite confidence about the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tavrohorvat53 Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 44 minutes ago, Green Building said: The 18 year old kid who hasn't even played an NHL game yet reminds you of Edler? C'mon Man Yeah he kinda does. Watch some of his extende d highlights on YT and you'll notice they're very much alike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beary Sweet Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 It feels like the team plays good every other period. Then they have a period where they completely melt down. But I'm willing to accept these kind of losses since they played well for the most part and don't have the starpower most teams have. Sedins were invisible for the most part. Granny and Eriksson had a few chances here and there. Tryamkin was launching a few shots but I'd love him to launch more slappers. Hope he stays in the lineup for tomorrow's game. Don't want Larsen back. Tryamkin is clearly > Larsen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted November 26, 2016 Share Posted November 26, 2016 6 minutes ago, Tavrohorvat53 said: Yeah he kinda does. Watch some of his extende d highlights on YT and you'll notice they're very much alike. Context. That wasn't so much my point as much as I find it %100 ridiculous to write off a kid before he's finished developing his skill set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.