Fat Phil Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 To Colorado: Alex Edler 2017 Van 2nd To Vancouver: Gabriel Landeskog Why? There's no secret Colorado needs defence. Like Vancouver they are currently at the bottom of the league, and have been rumored to been looking to deal Landy for a D-Man. For Vancouver its pretty obvious. With the emergence of Tryamkin, Stecher and with Juolevi probably becoming a Canuck next year, this is the perfect time to deal Edler. Landeskog instantly becomes a great piece going forward and brings some young leadership. 2nd round pick's are 50/50 of turning out and its worth it to add a player of Landeskog's calibre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monteeun Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 They might want someone younger tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 4 hours ago, Fat Phil said: To Colorado: Alex Edler 2017 Van 2nd To Vancouver: Gabriel Landeskog Why? There's no secret Colorado needs defence. Like Vancouver they are currently at the bottom of the league, and have been rumored to been looking to deal Landy for a D-Man. For Vancouver its pretty obvious. With the emergence of Tryamkin, Stecher and with Juolevi probably becoming a Canuck next year, this is the perfect time to deal Edler. Landeskog instantly becomes a great piece going forward and brings some young leadership. 2nd round pick's are 50/50 of turning out and its worth it to add a player of Landeskog's calibre. Their team is in shambles. Matt Duchene is not producing, neither is Mackinnon really. Tanev for .Duchene? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBoGo53 Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 This is another classic our scraps for your captain type trade. Colorado doesn't touch this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBoGo53 Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Their team is in shambles. Matt Duchene is not producing, neither is Mackinnon really. Tanev for .Duchene? Colorado doesn't do that. That isn't really good value for a player like Duchene. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 21 minutes ago, GoBoGo53 said: Colorado doesn't do that. That isn't really good value for a player like Duchene. Duchene has done nothing (not too much anyway) since ROR left. I think he needs to just play an offensive game to be at his best. He and Bo could really work well together? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 How does trading one of their best forwards for a defenseman solve their scoring woes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 13 minutes ago, Toews said: How does trading one of their best forwards for a defenseman solve their scoring woes? Good point. How come a team with that kind of offensive talent has scoring woes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87Crosby Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 Edler, 2nd Round pick, and a good prospect would maybe have them think about it. But they could get a better deal than that. Younger defenseman like Trouba? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 this effort to trade for landeskog has been beaten to death in at least 5 other topics we do not need yet another one that tries to fleece colorado you are adding nothing of value here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 33 minutes ago, coastal.view said: this effort to trade for landeskog has been beaten to death in at least 5 other topics we do not need yet another one that tries to fleece colorado you are adding nothing of value here And it's another one involving Edler. Like get some originality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 5 minutes ago, Pears said: And it's another one involving Edler. Like get some originality. way too many repetitive topics on here i was hoping this one had some originality normally i just ignore these repeat posts.. but this time commented but the hope on this site to pry landeskog out of colorado is such a reach people should compare what they offer for landeskog to what the canucks would accept in a trade for horvat once you are satisfied that what you would offer for landeskog you would accept to move bo then i am interested i kind of think landeskog for bo would be required at this point and that would cause cdc folk to scream and cry that the cost is too high .. but that is pretty close to equal value there is no reality about many of these proposals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green⌃Arrow Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 I'd do this instead... To Vancouver: Malcolm Subban Conditional 2017 1st round pick (If Boston makes the playoffs; 2nd rounder if they miss the playoffs) To Boston: Alexander Edler Not a chance we'd get Landeskog straight up unless we throw in our 1st or a top prospect. So no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whale Tail Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 3 hours ago, Alflives said: Good point. How come a team with that kind of offensive talent has scoring woes? Obviously its the coaching staff. THEY MUST FIRE THEM ALL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whale Tail Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 14 minutes ago, Green⌃Arrow said: I'd do this instead... To Vancouver: Malcolm Subban Conditional 2017 1st round pick (If Boston makes the playoffs; 2nd rounder if they miss the playoffs) To Boston: Alexander Edler Not a chance we'd get Landeskog straight up unless we throw in our 1st or a top prospect. So no thanks. Why would we trade Edler for another goalie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aircool Posted November 27, 2016 Share Posted November 27, 2016 3 hours ago, coastal.view said: way too many repetitive topics on here i was hoping this one had some originality normally i just ignore these repeat posts.. but this time commented but the hope on this site to pry landeskog out of colorado is such a reach people should compare what they offer for landeskog to what the canucks would accept in a trade for horvat once you are satisfied that what you would offer for landeskog you would accept to move bo then i am interested i kind of think landeskog for bo would be required at this point and that would cause cdc folk to scream and cry that the cost is too high .. but that is pretty close to equal value there is no reality about many of these proposals I've said this before to other people, lower your expectations of these trade proposals... You can't seriously expect an interesting trade proposal when the only trades we SHOULD be making are X rental player, or X player over 30 for picks. I mean... What value do these picks have? How does one analyze the trade, when you can't really say with any certainty what player is going to get selected with the 3rd round pick... Realistically though, we don't have the assets to acquire any sort of YOUNG and VALUABLE talent, and even then that may not do much for the success of our team on the scoresheet in the near term... Which defeats the purpose... Basically, I'm stating that there are NO POSSIBLE trade scenarios that are worth entertaining that have any tangible impact on our team in a substantially positive way. Hence the trade proposals suck. If we were a cup contending team, with that quality of assets, there would be a lot of ways we could be making transactions... But we're not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 7 hours ago, Green⌃Arrow said: I'd do this instead... To Vancouver: Malcolm Subban Conditional 2017 1st round pick (If Boston makes the playoffs; 2nd rounder if they miss the playoffs) To Boston: Alexander Edler Yeah, I'm not sure Boston's the best trading partner for us. Aside from Pastrnak and Forsbacka-Karlsson (kinda) they don't really have any likely top young forwards either, as their top prospects are all on the back end (Zboril, Morrow, Malcolm Subban), and being the Bruins their front group is mainly built on physical but less skilled guys (Trent Frederic and Zach Senyshyn as 1st round picks? Really?) who would be serviceable in the bottom-6 but not the top-6. If they would trade Pastrnak then sure (he's only 20 but a point/ game scorer), but highly doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 Landeskog will take a lot more than that to get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 I say let's see how canucks do without tanev Edler. If stecher and Tryamkin Hutton guddy Sbisa can hold down the fort I say go for it. Tanev for landeskog And/or Edler and 2nd for duchene Lineup Landeskog horvat duchene Sedins eriksson Granlund Sutter Hansen Baertschi gaunce rodin Tree stecher Hutton guddy Sbisa Larsen One can dream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IbanezRG Posted November 28, 2016 Share Posted November 28, 2016 On 2016-11-27 at 9:08 AM, GoBoGo53 said: This is another classic our scraps for your captain type trade. Colorado doesn't touch this. Tanev, Virtanen and boeser maybe and then Col actually calls us back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.