RetroCanuck Posted December 1, 2016 Share Posted December 1, 2016 I bet you Toronto Picks him up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted December 1, 2016 Share Posted December 1, 2016 29 minutes ago, kloubek said: ...may I introduce to you, exhibit "B" in the form of Erik Gudbranson.... Yea, I've noticed his too... it's pretty solid but I'm still not sold on Guddy yet... takes more than 23 games for me to develop a man crush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted December 1, 2016 Share Posted December 1, 2016 I vote for Toronto or Edmonton taking him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chronic.Canuck Posted December 1, 2016 Share Posted December 1, 2016 46 minutes ago, c00kies said: Tell EA, they screw this up lol. I'll get right on it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 9 hours ago, missioncanucksfan said: I know he is a bit of a big puss and has a salary of $1.58m but could he not help Utica's backend? He does have a decent shot and veteran presence. At age 25, I do feel this guy still has potential Thoughts? No. If we claim him we have to keep him on the roster. The purpose of waivers is to keep give players a chance to stay in the NHL rather than giving teams a free pass to send them to the AHL. Claiming someone and sending them to the AHL immediately is directly contradictory to that. I'm sure someone has already mentioned it, but it's worth repeating. How is it we have to mention this in every waivers thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robvp Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 5 hours ago, RetroCanuck said: I bet you Toronto Picks him up Probably, and then sit him in the press box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted December 2, 2016 Share Posted December 2, 2016 He cleared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drsofthands Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 id take anyone over larsen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead44 Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Wow he has really fallen after a very promising rookie season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Goose Posted December 4, 2016 Share Posted December 4, 2016 On 12/3/2016 at 9:18 AM, canucklehead44 said: Wow he has really fallen after a very promising rookie season. yeah I'm surprised as well. Thought he would turn into a solid all arounder with a booming shot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 With Larsen injured, we may have claimed him had this happened in the last two days? I like Gelinas. Had it happened anytime last year, or the year before, we also would have been in head deep! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 well he is offensively inclined and has an undeveloped if not poor defensive game to this point, Kind of Larsen-esque lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.