Doogie Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 To Montreal: Edler Hansen Virtanen To Canucks: Pacioretty 17' 2nd Round Pick Canucks are trading from a position of strength with how Stecher and Tryamkin are coming along. We also have Juolevi in the pipeline. Rumors are Montreal are looking to move Pacioretty and are looking for help on D. Virtanen is going the other way while Hansen can play up and down Montreal's lineup. To Colorado: Tanev To Canucks: Landeskog Again, trading from position of strength. Colorado could use the help on D and with Landeskog coming back our way we get more scoring. Hall is a better scorer than Landeskog while Tanev is a better Dman than Larson, so why not. Maybe we get a pick coming back our way. Lineup: Landeskog-Horvat-Pacioretty Sedin-Sedin-Eriksson Baertschi-Sutter-Granlund Burrows-Gaunce-Dorsett Tryamkin-Stecher Hutton-Gudbranson Sbisa-Larsen You're probably wondering about cap space, but with Burrows contract up at the end of they year and resigned at a far lower cap hit, as well as Millers coming off the books we could make this work. The following year the Sedins come off their contracts and we sign them to a 2 year contract around 5 mil each, that saves us another 4 mil. Even if we lose Granlund or Baertschi in the expansion again we still have Boeser in the pipeline. These trades would put us right back into contention for the foreseeable future, couple that with Bennings drafting and the future looks bright. We would probably still need to sign a D or two via free agency/college for depth. What do you guys think could these trades work, if not what would make them work. Discuss and/or bash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Not rumour. That was Friedman wondering if he would be better off with a change of venue. Regardless. With the injury to Galchenyuk Pacioretty isn't going anywhere. And if the do move him it will be for someone if equal value. Edler is out long term again and has become more and more injury prone. Hansens speed would mesh nicely with Montreal but the have I don't see where he fits in their lineup. Virtanen does nothing to help them short term. If Pacioretty moves it'll be for someone like Fowler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Yeah, no. Even with Johnson down for a few weeks they don't need another right hand D with a large salary. And we give up a lot in the Montreal deal. But two teams are going to trade us their captains? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 massive overpayment for pacioretty seriously not a chance in hell benning moves 3 pieces for him. hansen at deadlines worth a late first edlers worth more at their cheap salaries. Virtanen is a 20 yr old stud whos developing in utica hes going nowhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 3 hours ago, canuktravella said: massive overpayment for pacioretty seriously not a chance in hell benning moves 3 pieces for him. hansen at deadlines worth a late first edlers worth more at their cheap salaries. Virtanen is a 20 yr old stud whos developing in utica hes going nowhere. That's the kind of value it's going to take to get a guy like Pacioretty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green⌃Arrow Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 There seems to be lots of proposals for Landeskog and Pacioretty. How about we just go for Crosby? To Pittsburgh: Sedin 50% retained Sedin 50% retained Hansen Edler 1st round pick 2nd round pick 3rd round pick To Vancouver: Crosby Fleury Then... To Detroit: Miller To Vancouver: 2nd round pick 3rd round pick Then after that... To Florida: Tanev To Vancouver: Bjugstad 1st round pick 2nd round pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knucks16 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 8 hours ago, Doogie said: To Montreal: Edler Hansen Virtanen To Canucks: Pacioretty 17' 2nd Round Pick Canucks are trading from a position of strength with how Stecher and Tryamkin are coming along. We also have Juolevi in the pipeline. Rumors are Montreal are looking to move Pacioretty and are looking for help on D. Virtanen is going the other way while Hansen can play up and down Montreal's lineup. To Colorado: Tanev To Canucks: Landeskog Again, trading from position of strength. Colorado could use the help on D and with Landeskog coming back our way we get more scoring. Hall is a better scorer than Landeskog while Tanev is a better Dman than Larson, so why not. Maybe we get a pick coming back our way. Lineup: Landeskog-Horvat-Pacioretty Sedin-Sedin-Eriksson Baertschi-Sutter-Granlund Burrows-Gaunce-Dorsett Tryamkin-Stecher Hutton-Gudbranson Sbisa-Larsen You're probably wondering about cap space, but with Burrows contract up at the end of they year and resigned at a far lower cap hit, as well as Millers coming off the books we could make this work. The following year the Sedins come off their contracts and we sign them to a 2 year contract around 5 mil each, that saves us another 4 mil. Even if we lose Granlund or Baertschi in the expansion again we still have Boeser in the pipeline. These trades would put us right back into contention for the foreseeable future, couple that with Bennings drafting and the future looks bright. We would probably still need to sign a D or two via free agency/college for depth. What do you guys think could these trades work, if not what would make them work. Discuss and/or bash. I like it. pretty fair, close to value;) I would offer something like this:) Van-Mtl Edler + Burrows + Brisebois + 2nd for Pacioretty + Sergachev Van-Col Tanev + Baertschi + Gaunce + 3rd for Landeskog + Jost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 no to much for what we get back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.