Matt_T83 Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 I've been mulling this thought over for a while, and the hit by William Carrier on David Backes a few days ago really convinced me that this should be a thing. So, what are compound infractions? Currently, the NHL tends to consider individual violations when considering suspensions: Was it elbowing? Was it a head shot? Was it a late hit? Boarding? But what happens when a hit is sort of late, sort of a head shot, sort of charging, but not fully any of the three? Currently the NHL will evaluate each criteria individually, and if the incident doesn't meet the burden of proof, they do not suspend. I think the NHL needs to start tallying up infractions and then adding them together. For example: Half head shot = 0.5 points, half charging = 0.5 points, half late hit = 0.5 points. This would sum together for 1.5 points of intractions, with 1 point being the threshold for suspension. In comparison, a full headshot would be 1 point, which is a suspension. An egregious headshot could be 2-3 points. The more points, the longer the suspension. I think the problem with the NHL now is that players are so smart, and have figured out how to skirt the rules. They go just far enough without crossing the line for any individual infraction. But should we really be letting players get away with 3-4 borderline infractions on a single play? I don't think so. Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 I don't necessarily think you have a bad idea, I just don't think we'll see it implemented as it is just as open to interpretation and subjectivity as the current rules which are already poorly enforced as it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 as with all things nhl they come out like barnstormers when an idea is new players safety is an example and then they beat it down, dumb it down, until it has much less importance shanahan started out seriously and was forced to back down . now there is little seriousness left in that nhl department Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 That would require them to alter the wheel of justice they spin. Hoping for the NHL to do something right is a pipe dream. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted December 31, 2016 Share Posted December 31, 2016 Quite honestly, I really like this idea, provided that "half" infractions are still considered infractions at all. But you bring up a good point. With the individual evaluation of infractions, it makes pushing the line to a much closer level possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.