Honky Cat Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Only ones that look glaringly out are Hansen and Sbisa,whose grades are far too low.....IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianRugby Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Offense 24th out of 30 - D Defense 23rd out of 30 - D+ Prospects 17th out of 30 - C- Goaltending - Not great stats, but Miller has stolen games. Markstrom brings the mark down. - B Coaching - Like article said, hard to say considering the team he's given. - C GM - F Used prospect rankings from: http://thehockeywriters.com/nhl-prospect-pools-the-complete-ranking/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigCountry18 Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Spoiler Baer - A+ Burr- B+ Chaput- C+ Eriksson- C Gaunce- C+ Granlund- B- Hansen - C Bo- A+ Megna- C- Sedins- B- Skille- C+ Sutter- B- Virt- D Biega- C Edler- C+ Guddy - D Hutton- C Larsen- C- Sbisa- C Stecher- A Tanev- C Tram - A- Marky C+ Mills C+ Sportsnet wasn't far off. Here's my more accurate colour coded ratings report card. Grading system: A+ (95-100%) A (90-95%) A- (85-90%) B+ (80-85%) B (75-80%) B- (70-75%) C+ (65-70%) C (60-65%) C- (55-60%) D+ (50-55%) NHL^ D (45-50%) AHL D- (40-45%) Vancouver Canucks mid-season report card: Baer- A+ Burr- B Chap- C- Loui- C+ Gaunce- C Granny- B+ Hansen - B- Bo- A+ Megan- C- Dan- B+ Hank- B+ Skille- C Sutter- B+ Virt- D Biega- C- Edler- C+ Guddy - C Hutton- B- Larsen- D+ Sbisa- C+ Stecher- A Tanev- B+ Trym - A Marky B- Mills B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herberts Vasiljevs Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 It's not a significant difference but I think that Granny deserves a B+. Sbisa at only a C means whoever made these rankings hasn't really watched any of our games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianRugby Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, Herberts Vasiljevs said: It's not a significant difference but I think that Granny deserves a B+. Sbisa at only a C means whoever made these rankings hasn't really watched any of our games. I think a C means an adequate 3rd pairing defenseman, which is what Sbisa has turned into this year. No? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanisleryan Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 I rate the entire article I...for irrelevant. As in...it is irrelevant what some person who is asleep during most of games actually thinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gameburn2 Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 37 minutes ago, Hairy Kneel said: PP - F PK- C+ FO- A- SHOT% -F Yes, team statistics matter. Not save percentage, Corsi, etc., but PP, PK, OT. The surprises for me: 1. Horvat is the number one centre on this team... remember when he was supposed to be #3? (this was just last year.) 2. Granlund is like a bumblebee: no way he should be able to fly, but he does. 3. Sbisa is much improved and Tryamkin, and Stetcher are bona fide regulars. Who knew? 4. Sedins have slipped a lot in one year. We knew this had to happen, but this soon, and so precipitously? (If I were friends of theirs, I would consider suggesting retirement to them at the end of the season.) 5. Sutter has been as good as advertised. It would seem that his injury last year really was that detrimental to the team. 6. The fourth line led by Skille has had moments, but Skille, Megna, and Chaput will be in Utica or elsewhere by next year. 7. Gaunce is very lately improving. Needs to go to the Horvat school of power skating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 27 minutes ago, BigCountry18 said: Reveal hidden contents Baer - A+ Burr- B+ Chaput- C+ Eriksson- C Gaunce- C+ Granlund- B- Hansen - C Bo- A+ Megna- C- Sedins- B- Skille- C+ Sutter- B- Virt- D Biega- C Edler- C+ Guddy - D Hutton- C Larsen- C- Sbisa- C Stecher- A Tanev- C Tram - A- Marky C+ Mills C+ Sportsnet wasn't far off. Here's my more accurate colour coded ratings report card. Grading system: A+ (95-100%) A (90-95%) A- (85-90%) B+ (80-85%) B (75-80%) B- (70-75%) C+ (65-70%) C (60-65%) C- (55-60%) D+ (50-55%) NHL^ D (45-50%) AHL D- (40-45%) Vancouver Canucks mid-season report card: Baer- A+ Burr- B Chap- C- Loui- C+ Gaunce- C Granny- B+ Hansen - B- Bo- A+ Megan- C- Dan- B+ Hank- B+ Skille- C Sutter- B+ Virt- D Biega- C- Edler- C+ Guddy - C Hutton- B- Larsen- D+ Sbisa- C+ Stecher- A Tanev- B+ Trym - A Marky B- Mills B Those yellows are blinding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Obviously grades from someone that doesn't actually follow this team - or doesn't have a clue. Baertschi hasn't earned it. Granlund has been better on the whole - grades should be reversed, but the kids like the shiny ones. The Hansen grade is absurd - he was the team's best player - hands down - before injury - unless he's getting docked for attendance (report cards like this are stupid) What would you expect from a Canucksarmy kinda guy though - not gonna admit how wrong they were about Sbisa, who has been excellent stepping up in the absence of all the top 4 D. Sutter likewise - 'analtyics' guys are wounded that these guys have punked them. Anyone that grades Tanev a C should try a different profession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 5 hours ago, theilluminati said: Literally the biggest homer in all of broadcasting and that's a "reputable source"..?...Oh man the kool-aid courses through your veins doesn't it..? What? John Garrett is without a doubt one of the most honest men on TV. He's a legend. His only problem is that he's too honest and the old boys club doesn't like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 CDC Mods - C+ Trolls - A- Users - B- TSN1040 Bro Jake - F Pratt - D+ How good is this? Sekeres - C- Price - B+ Donnie - B B-Mac - B Moj - B- Sportsnet Hazel Mae's Mustache - B+ Carly Aggro Shoulders - A John Shannon's Glasses - B+ Elliot Friedman's Combover - B+ John Garret - A John Shorthouse - A- Street Fighter 2 Ken - A Ryu - A- Guile - B Zangief - D Dhalism - C- E. Honda - D+ Blanka - B+ Chung Li - A- Colors Red - A Green - A+ Blue - D Yellow - F Grey - F Black - B+ Magenta - B- Numbers 8 - B 2 - F 7- A+ 5.3676 - B+ 11 - A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 16 hours ago, mll said: Murphy is also Sportsnet and has had Filipovic during intermission to discuss Canucks. that was an embarrassing moment in Canucks broadcasting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neko Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 My opinion is somewhat close to Sportsnet's Sedin B-, Sedin B-, Megna C- Granny B, Sutter B, Eriksson C Baer B, Horvat A+, Burr B+ Gaunce C-, Chaput C, Skille C+ Hansen A- Virtanen F---------- (minus 10) Edler C, Stecher B Sbisa B+, Hutton C Tryamkin A-, Tanev B- Biega C Miller A+, Markstrom B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaft Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Hansen grade makes zero sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaimito Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 19 hours ago, S'all Good Man said: Regardless of the letter grades, its nice to see Jim was right about this team being in the mix for a playoff spot. If we can stay relatively healthy from here on out and get lucky with Boucher, we might get to see Bo get some 1st round experience. health is the key, since depth is not there. If they have Hansen, the forward group and lines will look better. Same with D, without Gud and Hutton, the group is taxed too much for every player. there is a reason WD is hard on playing D for every player. They can't win otherwise. They don't have the horses. If Miller can stay sharp, there is always a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
souprshooter Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 20 hours ago, S'all Good Man said: Regardless of the letter grades, its nice to see Jim was right about this team being in the mix for a playoff spot. If we can stay relatively healthy from here on out and get lucky with Boucher, we might get to see Bo get some 1st round experience. At least this time around he won't be on the 4th line like the round against Calgary lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.