Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

(Proposal) Vancouver PITTSBURG


Recommended Posts

Ik I just created a trade but I had an idea.

 

Canucks want Young forward and are willing to trade a defence.

 

We have Edler Tanev Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin sbisa Stecher 

 

 

We should be looking to trade Edler or Hutton IMO. MORE SO EDLER!! 

 

So I was researching teams that are in need of defence and PITTSBURG  came to my imagination

 

 

 

TO PITTSBURG 

EDLER retained salary OR HUTTON 

 

TO CANUCKS 

JAKE GUENTZEL OR preferably DANIEL SPRONG

 

 

 

WHY PITS DOES THIS?

They are obviously gonna contend again this year and I think they need to bolster their defence. So either Edler or Hutton can add to their team without a question.

 

Pitts top 6 defence 

letang Dailey

(Edler/hutton)  Shultz 

Maata Cole 

 

WHY CANUCKS DOES THIS? 

Getting either jake guentzel or daniel sprong is a win. Id prefer sprong who has the higher ceiling over guentzel though but guentzel is someone who can step in now. 

 

Canucks next year roster 

 

Sprong/guentzel horvat boeser 

Baertschi Sutter Eriksson 

Sedins Hansen 

Granlund Guadette virtanen

Juolevi Tanev (this was done in training camp) 

(Hutton/edler) Stecher 

Tryamkin Gudbranson 

Marky 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, luckylager said:

What in the dictionary of curse words is that?!

 

Terrible, just terrible. Epic fail.

 

You should be banned. I'm wicked insulted by your proposal. 

 

@StealthCanuck , please change his name to something like "buttwart".

Plz tell me what's wrong with it, I'm always open to suggestions. In my opinion I really like sprong so by all means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, orcasgonewild said:

Ik I just created a trade but I had an idea.

 

Canucks want Young forward and are willing to trade a defence.

 

We have Edler Tanev Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin sbisa Stecher 

 

 

We should be looking to trade Edler or Hutton IMO. MORE SO EDLER!! 

 

So I was researching teams that are in need of defence and PITTSBURG  came to my imagination

 

 

 

TO PITTSBURG 

EDLER retained salary OR HUTTON 

 

TO CANUCKS 

JAKE GUENTZEL OR preferably DANIEL SPRONG

 

 

 

WHY PITS DOES THIS?

They are obviously gonna contend again this year and I think they need to bolster their defence. So either Edler or Hutton can add to their team without a question.

 

Pitts top 6 defence 

letang Dailey

(Edler/hutton)  Shultz 

Maata Cole 

 

WHY CANUCKS DOES THIS? 

Getting either jake guentzel or daniel sprong is a win. Id prefer sprong who has the higher ceiling over guentzel though but guentzel is someone who can step in now. 

 

Canucks next year roster 

 

Sprong/guentzel horvat boeser 

Baertschi Sutter Eriksson 

Sedins Hansen 

Granlund Guadette virtanen

Juolevi Tanev (this was done in training camp) 

(Hutton/edler) Stecher 

Tryamkin Gudbranson 

Marky 

 

 

 

 

I really like sprong too apparently he has skill close to Mcjesus and eichel but his defensive game needs work. IM IN ::D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, orcasgonewild said:

Plz tell me what's wrong with it, I'm always open to suggestions. In my opinion I really like sprong so by all means.

You don't trade a very promising sophomore or a legit top 4dman for random scraps just trade someone. Hutton or Edler deserve a lot more and I'm grouchy because my wife is being annoying.

 

Sprong. Give your head a shake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, luckylager said:

You don't trade a very promising sophomore or a legit top 4dman for random scraps just trade someone. Hutton or Edler deserve a lot more and I'm grouchy because my wife is being annoying.

 

Sprong. Give your head a shake.

Its ok to be cranky don't worry but sprong isn't just scraps.

 

Sprong will be a #1 or #2 left wing, Hutton will be a 3 or 4 defenceman at best. But we could trade elder instead I gave the option too.

 

I think since we have depth on defence with either Tanev Stecher Gudbranson Tryamkin Juolevi (Edler/Hutton) and who ever else,  we have to get someone for a position of need.

 

 

Imagine sprong horvat boeser... 

 

 

 

That will be the best line in hockey in a couple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, luckylager said:

You don't trade a very promising sophomore or a legit top 4dman for random scraps just trade someone. Hutton or Edler deserve a lot more and I'm grouchy because my wife is being annoying.

 

Sprong. Give your head a shake.

Sprong and Guentzel aren't random scraps. Both are  A/B+ prospects.

 

Although I don't think Pittsburgh would be able to acquire Edler anyway due to cap. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, orcasgonewild said:

Its ok to be cranky don't worry but sprong isn't just scraps.

 

Sprong will be a #1 or #2 left wing, Hutton will be a 3 or 4 defenceman at best. But we could trade elder instead I gave the option too.

 

I think since we have depth on defence with either Tanev Stecher Gudbranson Tryamkin Juolevi (Edler/Hutton) and who ever else,  we have to get someone for a position of need.

 

 

Imagine sprong horvat boeser... 

 

 

 

That will be the best line in hockey in a couple years.

 

51 minutes ago, Odd. said:

Sprong and Guentzel aren't random scraps. Both are  A/B+ prospects.

 

Although I don't think Pittsburgh would be able to acquire Edler anyway due to cap. 

 

 

They are prospects. 

 

Hate on Edler all you want, I've wanted him traded since '14, but he's way more valuable than a prospect AND salary retained. 

Also, I'm not a fan of trading Hutton right now. Timing sucks, he's young, expansion.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...