orcasgonewild Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Ik I just created a trade but I had an idea. Canucks want Young forward and are willing to trade a defence. We have Edler Tanev Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin sbisa Stecher We should be looking to trade Edler or Hutton IMO. MORE SO EDLER!! So I was researching teams that are in need of defence and PITTSBURG came to my imagination TO PITTSBURG EDLER retained salary OR HUTTON TO CANUCKS JAKE GUENTZEL OR preferably DANIEL SPRONG WHY PITS DOES THIS? They are obviously gonna contend again this year and I think they need to bolster their defence. So either Edler or Hutton can add to their team without a question. Pitts top 6 defence letang Dailey (Edler/hutton) Shultz Maata Cole WHY CANUCKS DOES THIS? Getting either jake guentzel or daniel sprong is a win. Id prefer sprong who has the higher ceiling over guentzel though but guentzel is someone who can step in now. Canucks next year roster Sprong/guentzel horvat boeser Baertschi Sutter Eriksson Sedins Hansen Granlund Guadette virtanen Juolevi Tanev (this was done in training camp) (Hutton/edler) Stecher Tryamkin Gudbranson Marky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsMillerTime Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Boston says yes then hangs up. Then everyone on CDC says fire benning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, ItsMillerTime said: Boston says yes then hangs up. Then everyone on CDC says fire benning. Hb pittsburg? I got rid of the other deal cuz I didn't like it either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 What in the dictionary of curse words is that?! Terrible, just terrible. Epic fail. You should be banned. I'm wicked insulted by your proposal. @StealthCanuck , please change his name to something like "buttwart". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, luckylager said: What in the dictionary of curse words is that?! Terrible, just terrible. Epic fail. You should be banned. I'm wicked insulted by your proposal. @StealthCanuck , please change his name to something like "buttwart". Plz tell me what's wrong with it, I'm always open to suggestions. In my opinion I really like sprong so by all means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Ross Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 3 hours ago, orcasgonewild said: Ik I just created a trade but I had an idea. Canucks want Young forward and are willing to trade a defence. We have Edler Tanev Hutton Gudbranson Tryamkin sbisa Stecher We should be looking to trade Edler or Hutton IMO. MORE SO EDLER!! So I was researching teams that are in need of defence and PITTSBURG came to my imagination TO PITTSBURG EDLER retained salary OR HUTTON TO CANUCKS JAKE GUENTZEL OR preferably DANIEL SPRONG WHY PITS DOES THIS? They are obviously gonna contend again this year and I think they need to bolster their defence. So either Edler or Hutton can add to their team without a question. Pitts top 6 defence letang Dailey (Edler/hutton) Shultz Maata Cole WHY CANUCKS DOES THIS? Getting either jake guentzel or daniel sprong is a win. Id prefer sprong who has the higher ceiling over guentzel though but guentzel is someone who can step in now. Canucks next year roster Sprong/guentzel horvat boeser Baertschi Sutter Eriksson Sedins Hansen Granlund Guadette virtanen Juolevi Tanev (this was done in training camp) (Hutton/edler) Stecher Tryamkin Gudbranson Marky I really like sprong too apparently he has skill close to Mcjesus and eichel but his defensive game needs work. IM IN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 1 minute ago, orcasgonewild said: Plz tell me what's wrong with it, I'm always open to suggestions. In my opinion I really like sprong so by all means. You don't trade a very promising sophomore or a legit top 4dman for random scraps just trade someone. Hutton or Edler deserve a lot more and I'm grouchy because my wife is being annoying. Sprong. Give your head a shake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted January 20, 2017 Author Share Posted January 20, 2017 15 minutes ago, luckylager said: You don't trade a very promising sophomore or a legit top 4dman for random scraps just trade someone. Hutton or Edler deserve a lot more and I'm grouchy because my wife is being annoying. Sprong. Give your head a shake. Its ok to be cranky don't worry but sprong isn't just scraps. Sprong will be a #1 or #2 left wing, Hutton will be a 3 or 4 defenceman at best. But we could trade elder instead I gave the option too. I think since we have depth on defence with either Tanev Stecher Gudbranson Tryamkin Juolevi (Edler/Hutton) and who ever else, we have to get someone for a position of need. Imagine sprong horvat boeser... That will be the best line in hockey in a couple years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odd. Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, luckylager said: You don't trade a very promising sophomore or a legit top 4dman for random scraps just trade someone. Hutton or Edler deserve a lot more and I'm grouchy because my wife is being annoying. Sprong. Give your head a shake. Sprong and Guentzel aren't random scraps. Both are A/B+ prospects. Although I don't think Pittsburgh would be able to acquire Edler anyway due to cap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 While I don't think the value is too far off, if the Penguins wanted they could probably just go the rental option and make a pass at Shattenkirk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 55 minutes ago, orcasgonewild said: Its ok to be cranky don't worry but sprong isn't just scraps. Sprong will be a #1 or #2 left wing, Hutton will be a 3 or 4 defenceman at best. But we could trade elder instead I gave the option too. I think since we have depth on defence with either Tanev Stecher Gudbranson Tryamkin Juolevi (Edler/Hutton) and who ever else, we have to get someone for a position of need. Imagine sprong horvat boeser... That will be the best line in hockey in a couple years. 51 minutes ago, Odd. said: Sprong and Guentzel aren't random scraps. Both are A/B+ prospects. Although I don't think Pittsburgh would be able to acquire Edler anyway due to cap. They are prospects. Hate on Edler all you want, I've wanted him traded since '14, but he's way more valuable than a prospect AND salary retained. Also, I'm not a fan of trading Hutton right now. Timing sucks, he's young, expansion.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green⌃Arrow Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 I'd rather keep our Ds. Not everyone is going to play 82 games in a season. I think our offense is coming along. Perhaps the player we need to try Jordan Subban at forward. He has all the offensive skills and speed to be a great scorer in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 You forgot to add a 2nd round pick that Pittsburgh is going to weasel out of Benning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sedinery33 Posted January 20, 2017 Share Posted January 20, 2017 Sedin's and 2 2nd round picks for Malkin/Sprong... One can dream Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.