J-23 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Both great players that bring different things to this team. I love the leadership Guddy brings to the team and the physicality Tram is giving us. Both great players that i would love to have on this team going forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 2 hours ago, Sean Avery said: Interested to see which physical/defensive defenseman the Canucks fan base prefers more. I didn't vote because there's no choice for both? I would like to see both stick around, way to early to say which out of the 2 will be better butr I do think Guddy is more of a leader and taking care of business in standing up for his teammates and Tryamkin could end up being a beast, crushing guys and great intiimitater . I'm glad we have both of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 2 hours ago, VIC_CITY said: Tryamkin. He is only going to get better. Not so sure about Gudbranson Guddy's only 24 he has alot of room and time to get better but we have not seen him at his best because of injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Like many have said, love what Guddy brings to the table - his toughness and leadership are an essential and welcomed addition to rebuild around. Tryamkin, however, just has something special about him. Sky's the limit with that kid and it's fantastic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkpoet Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 TRYAMBRANSON I aem Russnadianz I krush u Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 18 minutes ago, Sbriggs said: Guddy's only 24 he has alot of room and time to get better but we have not seen him at his best because of injuries. He's actually 25. Not that that is old or anything but he'll be entering his 7th NHL season next year, while Tryamkin will basically have only played 1 full season on north american ice. So IMO Gudbranson is pretty close to reaching his ceiling. While Tryamkin is barely scratching the surface. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Just now, VIC_CITY said: He's actually 25. Not that that is old or anything but he'll be entering his 7th NHL season next year, while Tryamkin will basically have only played 1 full season on north american ice. So IMO Gudbranson is pretty close to reaching his ceiling. While Tryamkin is barely scratching the surface. Thats cool we can agree to disagree. I think they hold the same value as of right but they bring a different skill to the game. I want to keep both and I don't care who's 1-2 or 3-4 pairing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 3 hours ago, Pears said: I thought I might not be the first to think of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugor Hill Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 3 hours ago, Hutton Wink said: You must not ever have two (perceptively) similar players on the roster and thus must dispose of one as being completely redundant. Should've traded one of the Sedins a long time ago then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 3 hours ago, S'all Good Man said: Maybe we can be friends Who are you and what have you done with my bae? gtfo troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davathor Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 4 hours ago, Ossi Vaananen said: I think the real question is who do we expose in the expansion draft - Gudbranson or Sbisa? Sbisa is looking like a legit top 4, while Gudbranson has been suspect at times, and is going to miss the majority of the season with injury. Can only protect 3 of: Edler Tanev Gudbranson Sbisa Thats actually a tough call... I mean between Edler Sbisa and Okbranson. Sbisa has played way above expectations (after last season especially) looks like he can handle some minutes, is still young and would be a shame to lose. Guddy .. well he hasn't been the monster he looked like he was during the panthers playoff run, and he isn't signed long term.. but he is also young and physical, new team etc Edler plays like a man half his size, always has (besides half of one playoff run) and doesn't really stick up for his team, and he's old. OK I'm not the biggest Edler fan, but I'll admit the win/loss when Edlers out doesn't lie, and he's good for 20+ mins every game... with less minutes and an offensive D partner (al a Ehroff, 49 points) he could be great again. whoever they choose to expose, bring in a good puck moving defenceman, we have the the defensive d-men covered. Jesus do we ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 1 hour ago, Mathew Barzal said: Who are you and what have you done with my bae? gtfo troll. He's in Toronto waiting for you. When are you going to get that double flamingo off your sig? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 They'd make a very scary pairing on the PK.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Crappy ass poll because there is no Both option. I mean, who wouldn't want both on the same defensive corps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 1 hour ago, S'all Good Man said: He's in Toronto waiting for you. When are you going to get that double flamingo off your sig? The day Virtanen blossoms into a top six powerforward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HorvatToBaertschi Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Gudbranson is à Taller, bigger, Tougher version of bieksa. Tryamkin is our chara. I love em both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 8 hours ago, Ossi Vaananen said: I think the real question is who do we expose in the expansion draft - Gudbranson or Sbisa? Sbisa is looking like a legit top 4, while Gudbranson has been suspect at times, and is going to miss the majority of the season with injury. Can only protect 3 of: Edler Tanev Gudbranson Sbisa If i was GM Edler would be given up in expanison. He's 30. He won't be part of a deep playoff run while he is still half decent. Yes our back end might struggle a little bit but we need to be young . Hutton-Tanev Sbisa-Tryamkin(Stecher?) Juolevi-Gudbranson I don't even know where Stecher fits in tbh. And I love the kid Hutty/Sbisa can switch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 8 hours ago, Ossi Vaananen said: I think the real question is who do we expose in the expansion draft - Gudbranson or Sbisa? Sbisa is looking like a legit top 4, while Gudbranson has been suspect at times, and is going to miss the majority of the season with injury. Can only protect 3 of: Edler Tanev Gudbranson Sbisa Easy, expose Sbisa Only because he has 1 year left until he's UFA and I am doubtful that Vegas will claim him for that reason Gudbranson hopefully can be signed for a reasonable Tanev level kind of contract. As much as Guddy has been bad this year we have to remember the poor first few years that Sbisa had and it's quite possible that Guddy can have a similar learning curve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 1 hour ago, Outsiders said: If i was GM Edler would be given up in expanison. He's 30. He won't be part of a deep playoff run while he is still half decent. Yes our back end might struggle a little bit but we need to be young . Hutton-Tanev Sbisa-Tryamkin(Stecher?) Juolevi-Gudbranson I don't even know where Stecher fits in tbh. And I love the kid Hutty/Sbisa can switch I'd trade Tanev just before the expansion draft. Edler/Stecher Juolevi/Gudbranson Sbisa/Tryamkin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.