Mackcanuck Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Bo and Miller rate A's He is pretty hard on Edler, Guddy, Gaunce and Chaput Overall a B - http://www.tsn.ca/vancouver-limited-offence-earns-canucks-a-b-1.659483 Grading System A Excellent B Very Good C Satisfactory D Poor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beary Sweet Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 All the grades are fair and well assessed. Looking at Eriksson's grade is pretty dismal considering the money we spent to get him... 5 more years of this from him.. hope he turns it around in the 2nd half. also Hansen should be higher if he wasn't out with injury more than half of the season so far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
189lb enforcers? Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Haha Edler Stud D, alright. The list is not too far off, actually. The Sedins get mercy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jägermeister Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Pretty fair actually, I'd make a couple changes: Markstrom: B (He's been very solid, just being out shined my Miller) Stecher: A- (Not even expected to make the team and you could make a case for him being our best Dman this season) Sedins: C (Underperforming, especially relevant to their cap hit, but it was to be expected at their age) Chaput: C (I mean yeah he doesn't do much but who really expected him to, Gaunce stays at a D because there was a bit of expectation) Eriksson: D- (By far the biggest disappointment, huge drop in scoring and on a huge deal) Outside of those everyone is pretty accurate IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 I feel Skille is underrated. He's scored some big goals. I don't remember us ever signing a PTO that has had this much impact on our team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 I agree with Elder and Guddy's grades, Baertschi is a little high, Ericksson is a D, Chaput, Skille and Gaunce are doing what is asked by them so I'd give them all C's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sygvard Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 I mean, Gaunce and Chaput have really been non-factors. Obviously not amazing. But I don't know how you can give a fourth liner making 600K a D grade for putting up unspectacular fourth line numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 I give Willie a B+, I know everyone hates his deployment but honestly I can't think of a worst roster aside from Arizona and he has this team in the playoff hunt. With the roster he has to ice night in and night out that is pretty impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honeydews Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Willies coaching... C- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Just now, Honeydews said: Willies coaching... C- But Willie's stache gets an A+. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUCKER67 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Gaunce has been a disappointment in my eyes. Drafted 26th overall, has 1 goal in 65 NHL games. A big, young forward who continues to be a non-factor. Stecher should be given at least a B+, maybe an A-. I think Button's grades are pretty fair. So, if Daniel and Henrik are each given a B-, and Bo is given an A and Baertschi is given a B+ (better grades), then why aren't Bo and Baer on the top line? Someone should e-mail this to Willie LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Just now, NUCKER67 said: Gaunce has been a disappointment in my eyes. Drafted 26th overall, has 1 goal in 65 NHL games. A big, young forward who continues to be a non-factor. Stecher should be given at least a B+, maybe an A-. I think Button's grades are pretty fair. So, if Daniel and Henrik are each given a B-, and Bo is given an A and Baertschi is given a B+ (better grades), then why aren't Bo and Baer on the top line? Someone should e-mail this to Willie LOL Willie doesn't determine our top line. The other teams' coaches do that by matching their top shut down defensive players against them. When we see Bo and Baer getting matched against the other teams' top shut down guys, then they will be our top line. Right now, other coaches still play their best guys against the Twins. (IMHAO, of course) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue_Jays_Canucks Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Markstrom a C? That's almost offensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 B- for the Sedin is pretty generous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Tryamkin should get an A. Megna should get a D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Just now, The 5th Line said: He is quite fascinating to watch. He's basically your standard 4th line/depth forward but every once in awhile he does something amazing with puck and he reminds you that he was drafted 7th overall. I definitely feel that he's our best of the 4th liners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Real-gud and 6x6 both D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xereau Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Bet money that this guy has watched at best 3 Canucks game highlights all year. This is a member of the expert team that picked them at what.. 65 points? Their track record, like most of the media, is clickbait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 27, 2017 Share Posted January 27, 2017 Edler is too low, Gaunce is a little bit too low (maybe a C-), and the twins are too high. I wouldn't say the twins are anything above satisfactory this season. Markstrom is a wee bit low as well, but not too much. A surprisingly fair list overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.