Bandwagon38 Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Toronto has what we need and some would say that we have what they need! Total speculation here but I think there is room for a blockbuster deal! It also swaps players and picks to the opposite sides of the league. There are many combinations here so let's hear them all! Vancouver trades... Tanev, Markstrom and a 3rd Toronto trades... Nylander, Andersen and a 1st obviously this would require us to resign Miller until Demko is ready Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Neilsons Towel Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Remove the goalies and the picks and just keep it simple, Nylander for Tanev. It probably would not happen but it would be our version of the Hall for Larsson trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 makes no sense toronto wont give up nylander hes great especially for tanev whos 27 tanev will be traded to a contender that needs d help pens, rangers, habs, caps, blues, ducks all could use him i saw sell him to highest bidder at tradedeadline who ever wants to give up a big package for him to win now go for it we should sell sutter, hansen and miller and burr as well look at blue jackets they are so young and look great Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Andersen's on pace to match his career high in wins for a season (35), and they want to trade him after signing him to that long-term deal? Markstrom would be a downgrade to Frederik. Also, in what world is Tanev and a 3rd = Nylander and a 1st? William's a 60-point sophomore, so even for them to trade him for Chris one-to-one would be a coup for Vancouver IMO. Zaitsev over there is holding his own with Rielly, so while it would be great from their perspective to add an elite shot-suppressant in Chris to play with Rielly (the two did play together before for Team Canada) I'm not sure if Sweet Lou would be willing to part with his young gun so quickly. Don't see a savvy GM like him getting ripped off like Chiarelli did in the Hall - Larsson deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Is it just me or would this trade be heavily lopsided in our favour? Don't see it happening. At first, I thought Marky was more valuable than Andersen to us, but Andersen's actually only a few months older and much more established. Andersen now is probably at Markstrom's ceiling. I'd say Nylander for Tanev is in favour of us too. Just looking at them right now, Tanev is probably a slightly better player, but Nylander's age (20) and potential make his value much higher than Tanev's. On top of that, we get a 1st for a 3rd. Maybe swap the picks around and it's more feasible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derp... Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 I don't think Lou is capable of a deal like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 Ander5on seems pretty hot & cold to me. I like the premise of the deal. Emphasize the D for fwd theme: Van: Tanev, Markstrom, McEneny/Subban TO: Nylander, Anderson, 1 more good fwd prospect(?, don't know enough to say which one, but similar age/status to Subban) This way they get two local guys for their D core. On the goalies: One could argue that Anderson may have more upside, but Markstrom represents less $/LT-risk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falcon45ca Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 6 hours ago, Bandwagon38 said: Vancouver trades... Tanev, Markstrom and a 3rd Toronto trades... Nylander, Andersen and a 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoseTruckWasIt Posted February 7, 2017 Share Posted February 7, 2017 I don't like Andersen at all - maybe it was that stupid Lego artwork - okay, it definitely was - but Markstrom has a long way to go to prove that he's better. This deal only makes sense if TOR has decided that Andersen is a disaster and that Markstrom is a sure bet. Even still, this would hardly be the cheapest way out of the bind. Tanev and Juolevi for Nylander would get Lamoriello on the phone, but I wouldn't be happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Why not something off the wall like Tanev for Kasperi Kapanen and Byron Froese. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mecomaker54 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 On 2/7/2017 at 0:08 AM, Bandwagon38 said: Toronto has what we need and some would say that we have what they need! Total speculation here but I think there is room for a blockbuster deal! It also swaps players and picks to the opposite sides of the league. There are many combinations here so let's hear them all! Vancouver trades... Tanev, Markstrom and a 3rd Toronto trades... Nylander, Andersen and a 1st obviously this would require us to resign Miller until Demko is ready This is an incredibly interesting deal because of the fact that Toronto feels that they won't be able to afford Nylander down the road ( and rumours are spreading that they are shopping him) AND that it is a pretty fair deal for both sides. I think you could make arguments that either side would say no. That being said Markstrom is a downgrade from Andersen, no question about it. But Tanev for Nylander is interesting because what you lose defensively in Tanev you gain back offensively in Nylander and vice versa. Canucks would say yes in a heartbeat but not sure about the Leafs. Also we wouldn't have to necessarily resign Miller, back up goalies are a dime a dozen in this league and Demko will probably only need a season or 2 before he's ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazee20 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Why would the Leafs want to make this trade? Just because the Oilers were desperate for a D-man doesn't Leafs are. They have a bunch of rookies on their team that have just started their NHL career and If they make the playoffs, it is a bonus for them. They don't need to make this trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 On 2/6/2017 at 9:24 PM, Toews said: Remove the goalies and the picks and just keep it simple, Nylander for Tanev. It probably would not happen but it would be our version of the Hall for Larsson trade. Except tanev a little bit > Larsson but Hall >>>> Nylander 2 hours ago, crazee20 said: Why would the Leafs want to make this trade? Just because the Oilers were desperate for a D-man doesn't Leafs are. They have a bunch of rookies on their team that have just started their NHL career and If they make the playoffs, it is a bonus for them. They don't need to make this trade. Because a young team desperately needs defensive stability else you become Edmonton. Letting in 6-8 goals a night is not a good work environment for the young promising talent to grow into. tanev is steady but also 27 in his prime and signed for the next 4-5 years at a good price. For those same reasons I'll only trade tanev for nylander if it comes with a nice addition alongside it. preferably I'll keep him around for 1-2 years at least while tryamkin / stecher / juolevi / Hutton further their development Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggieBush Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 8 hours ago, crazee20 said: Why would the Leafs want to make this trade? Just because the Oilers were desperate for a D-man doesn't Leafs are. They have a bunch of rookies on their team that have just started their NHL career and If they make the playoffs, it is a bonus for them. They don't need to make this trade. But they have no defense. They have Reilly who is good, and Zaitsev who is maybe a 2nd pairing guy. I would not make this trade either way because I hold Tanev at much greater value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.