orcasgonewild Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 I was thinking about this impossible trade and was wondering what we could do to get sam reinhart. Its obvious this trade would be impossible to do but looking at buffalos needs and how they're deploying him we could use him. - first off buffalo is deploying him as a third line centre or winger which is wrong because they have eichel and orielly - second buffalo needs a top four defenceman - I would've said Edler but it's unlikely To buffalo Tanev Granlund To canucks Reinhart In off-season sign Zach Aston-Reese Canucks lineups afterwards Baertschi horvat hansen Aston-Reese reinhart boeser Sedins Eriksson Boucher Sutter gaunce Tryamkin stecher edler Gudbranson Sbisa hutton Marky Future top 6 LW reinhart boeser Baertschi horvat virtanen/Aston-Reese Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thejazz97 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 - Trading Tanev would destroy our defense - Virtanen's a better option to trade - No comment on Aston-Reese, although I think Hampus Gustafsson might be someone more up Benning's alley Lines would probably be something along the lines of: Sedin - Sedin - Reinhart Baertschi - Horvat - Boeser Granlund - Sutter - Eriksson Boucher - Chaput - Hansen But I'd be surprised if the trade happened at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsMillerTime Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Don't think Buffalo needs Right handed Dman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, thejazz97 said: - Trading Tanev would destroy our defense - Virtanen's a better option to trade - No comment on Aston-Reese, although I think Hampus Gustafsson might be someone more up Benning's alley Lines would probably be something along the lines of: Sedin - Sedin - Reinhart Baertschi - Horvat - Boeser Granlund - Sutter - Eriksson Boucher - Chaput - Hansen But I'd be surprised if the trade happened at all. I originally had Baertschi and Tanev but that depletes our LW. I was thinking Tanev because he has most value even tho our defence would take a hit. We do have Tryamkin stecher Gudbranson to replace him on the right side tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orcasgonewild Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 minute ago, ItsMillerTime said: Don't think Buffalo needs Right handed Dman Ik what ur saying but after Rasmussen Tanev could easily step instead of kulikov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 56 minutes ago, orcasgonewild said: Ik what ur saying but after Rasmussen Tanev could easily step instead of kulikov That's likely true but they still have Bogosian and Franson as right-handed options (both are injured but when healthy they'd probably form a solid trio with Risto, plus Kulikov can also play on the right side). Maybe if there's a side trade to move one of their expensive D-men? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBoGo53 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Buffalo isn't trading Reinhart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 hour ago, orcasgonewild said: I was thinking about this impossible trade and was wondering what we could do to get sam reinhart. Its obvious this trade would be impossible to do but looking at buffalos needs and how they're deploying him we could use him. - first off buffalo is deploying him as a third line centre or winger which is wrong because they have eichel and orielly Reinhart doesn't get used as 3rd line centre. He's used as a 1st/2nd line winger. He only goes to centre when either Eichel or O'Reilly is injured. His stats have shown that he's as good of a winger as he is a centre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 hour ago, ItsMillerTime said: Don't think Buffalo needs Right handed Dman This. Just like Colorado proposals, their weakness is the left side. Their only D really producing is Ristolanen, but next best is Franson. Both are RHD, and they still have Bogosian and his unmovable contract on their right side (but even Taylor Fedun - yes, formerly Utica's Fedun - is providing more offence than Bogo). Jake McCabe is their best bet on the left, with both Kulikov and Gorges providing little to no offence this year. That brings us to the other problem: offence. Reinhart is their third leading scorer. He, Okposo and O'Reilly are 1-2-3 at 33, 34 and 35 points on the year respectively. That's on a team that's 24th in goals for. They aren't going to trade offence for defence when they have plenty of that they don't want. If you really want Buffalo's attention, start thinking of something like Tryamkin and Boeser. We wouldn't pay that, but think of what a team would have to offer us for Horvat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vancitycanucks53 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 1 hour ago, thejazz97 said: - Trading Tanev would destroy our defense - Virtanen's a better option to trade - No comment on Aston-Reese, although I think Hampus Gustafsson might be someone more up Benning's alley Lines would probably be something along the lines of: Sedin - Sedin - Reinhart Baertschi - Horvat - Boeser Granlund - Sutter - Eriksson Boucher - Chaput - Hansen But I'd be surprised if the trade happened at all. I agree that losing Tanev is a big hit to take, but you gotta give quality to get quality. Tanev is probably our highest valued player other than Horvat. Tanev is one of the only ways Benning will be able to fill the 1st line player hole we have for our future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 2 hours ago, thejazz97 said: - Trading Tanev would destroy our defense - Virtanen's a better option to trade - No comment on Aston-Reese, although I think Hampus Gustafsson might be someone more up Benning's alley Lines would probably be something along the lines of: Sedin - Sedin - Reinhart Baertschi - Horvat - Boeser Granlund - Sutter - Eriksson Boucher - Chaput - Hansen But I'd be surprised if the trade happened at all. not sure trading tanev would destroy our defense we have guddy tryamkin and stecher if anything it gives these guys more of a chance to develop as nhlers does anyone know if guddy will be back this yr tanev, hansen, burrows, miller, sutter could all be sent to contenders. hansen to capitals for a late first miller to ducks for 2nd 3rd burrows to habs for a third tanev a second to isles for 1st and strome sutter to east conference for best right handed defence prospect and a 3rd 22 mill off books resign miller rodin burrows cheap deals july first if they wanna play one more yr sedin sedin eriksson baertchi horvat boeser granlund strome rodin dorsett gaunce burrows edler tryamkin hutton guddy sbisa stecher juolevi marky miller team doesnt look bad plus 3 firsts 2 seconds 3 thirds and a goid d prospect helps us stock prospects up in utica Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABNuck Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 4 hours ago, orcasgonewild said: I was thinking about this impossible trade and was wondering what we could do to get sam reinhart. Its obvious this trade would be impossible to do but looking at buffalos needs and how they're deploying him we could use him. Were you thinking about it because you searched for and read through at least a dozen or so other threads about trading for Sam Reinhart? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 4 hours ago, orcasgonewild said: I was thinking about this impossible trade and was wondering what we could do to get sam reinhart. Its obvious this trade would be impossible to do but looking at buffalos needs and how they're deploying him we could use him. - first off buffalo is deploying him as a third line centre or winger which is wrong because they have eichel and orielly - second buffalo needs a top four defenceman - I would've said Edler but it's unlikely To buffalo Tanev Granlund To canucks Reinhart In off-season sign Zach Aston-Reese Canucks lineups afterwards Baertschi horvat hansen Aston-Reese reinhart boeser Sedins Eriksson Boucher Sutter gaunce Tryamkin stecher edler Gudbranson Sbisa hutton Marky Future top 6 LW reinhart boeser Baertschi horvat virtanen/Aston-Reese I like Sam Reinhart, but he's kind of slow. We will need to surround him with speed, which we don't have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 The time to trade for Reinhart was at the draft to move up to nab him. The Sabres aren't moving him unless an equally impressive young player is coming back their way. So many other pieces they could trade before giving up on Reinhart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhodgejr Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 13 hours ago, orcasgonewild said: I was thinking about this impossible trade and was wondering what we could do to get sam reinhart. Its obvious this trade would be impossible to do but looking at buffalos needs and how they're deploying him we could use him. - first off buffalo is deploying him as a third line centre or winger which is wrong because they have eichel and orielly - second buffalo needs a top four defenceman - I would've said Edler but it's unlikely To buffalo Tanev Granlund To canucks Reinhart In off-season sign Zach Aston-Reese Canucks lineups afterwards Baertschi horvat hansen Aston-Reese reinhart boeser Sedins Eriksson Boucher Sutter gaunce Tryamkin stecher edler Gudbranson Sbisa hutton Marky Future top 6 LW reinhart boeser Baertschi horvat virtanen/Aston-Reese I think Granlund will be a 1st line elite winger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tank4Bedard Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 On 2/11/2017 at 0:13 PM, canuktravella said: not sure trading tanev would destroy our defense we have guddy tryamkin and stecher if anything it gives these guys more of a chance to develop as nhlers does anyone know if guddy will be back this yr tanev, hansen, burrows, miller, sutter could all be sent to contenders. hansen to capitals for a late first miller to ducks for 2nd 3rd burrows to habs for a third tanev a second to isles for 1st and strome sutter to east conference for best right handed defence prospect and a 3rd 22 mill off books resign miller rodin burrows cheap deals july first if they wanna play one more yr sedin sedin eriksson baertchi horvat boeser granlund strome rodin dorsett gaunce burrows edler tryamkin hutton guddy sbisa stecher juolevi marky miller team doesnt look bad plus 3 firsts 2 seconds 3 thirds and a goid d prospect helps us stock prospects up in utica Hansen not worth a 1st. We canucks fans overvalue him. Other teams wont Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 On 2/11/2017 at 9:58 AM, thejazz97 said: - Trading Tanev would destroy our defense - Virtanen's a better option to trade - No comment on Aston-Reese, although I think Hampus Gustafsson might be someone more up Benning's alley Lines would probably be something along the lines of: Sedin - Sedin - Reinhart Baertschi - Horvat - Boeser Granlund - Sutter - Eriksson Boucher - Chaput - Hansen But I'd be surprised if the trade happened at all. loosing tanev would not destroy anything we can afford to loose one of Tanev or Edler just not both, that an over reaction. Virtanen doesn't have much value right now needs to continue to develope in Utica and since you have no comment on AR then thats it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 12, 2017 Share Posted February 12, 2017 3 hours ago, DontMessMe said: Hansen not worth a 1st. We canucks fans overvalue him. Other teams wont I might agree, except this: Hansen is clearly a very good player five on five and the PK. He has excellent puck pursuit, and is great at back pressure. Most important though, is a top team would get Hansen for two playoff runs, because he's got one more year on his contract - and he's cheap. No, Hansen will return a first and a decent prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoseTruckWasIt Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 Buffalo could really make hay in the media with this deal. They'd be like, "we traded our 2nd overall pick for.........these guys.......that you probably haven't heard of. We gave up on Sam. His 23g and 19a as a rookie was terrible. His 900k salary for 2 more years is a cap killer. We're happy to add 4.5 mil in this deal. It's better than developing our own guys. Trust me, this is a great deal". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tank4Bedard Posted February 13, 2017 Share Posted February 13, 2017 9 hours ago, Alflives said: I might agree, except this: Hansen is clearly a very good player five on five and the PK. He has excellent puck pursuit, and is great at back pressure. Most important though, is a top team would get Hansen for two playoff runs, because he's got one more year on his contract - and he's cheap. No, Hansen will return a first and a decent prospect. Im sorry if i understood this wrong, but your telling me Hansen will fetch us a 1st and a prospect If so, your delusional. Straight up. No team will offer that. If we trade Hansen for a 1st then I will post on my news update or whatever its called that Alf is amazing and that i fking suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.