Where'd Luongo? Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 Though it's likely they will keep the pick and bolster their centre position, Shero said he has received some calls regarding teams trying to acquire the pick. Any likely trade would probably have to include a top 2 defender, top 6 center, or a top 4 defender + a good pick. Would the Canucks be interested? Yes. Should the Canucks be interested? Yes. Can the Canucks pay the price? Maybe. They have Tanev, Sbisa and Gudbranson on the right side where help is most needed for NJ. Any of those players would likely need an additional pick attached to them in order to fetch the #1 pick. Other teams of interest (in my opinion): - Montreal (no 1st line centre and quite a few defensemen) - Colorado (Perhaps Duchene or Landeskog) Source: https://www.thescore.com/news/1309836 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 I think Tampa should inquire if they are still shopping Drouin, and if I was NJ I would be hella listening that call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny in Vancouver Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 16 minutes ago, Where'd Luongo? said: Though it's likely they will keep the pick and bolster their centre position, Shero said he has received some calls regarding teams trying to acquire the pick. Any likely trade would probably have to include a top 2 defender, top 6 center, or a top 4 defender + a good pick. This should be easy! I'll let Shero do one of the following deals: Sbisa + Sutter for the top pick. Sbisa was a top 2 defender for quite a bit of the season for the Canucks, and Sutter is technically our second-line center Sbisa + our first rounder I'll also throw-in some old Corey Schneider Vancouver jerseys for free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted May 29, 2017 Author Share Posted May 29, 2017 1 minute ago, vinny_in_vancouver said: This should be easy! I'll let Shero do one of the following deals: Sbisa + Sutter for the top pick. Sbisa was a top 2 defender for quite a bit of the season for the Canucks, and Sutter is technically our second-line center Sbisa + our first rounder I'll also throw-in some old Corey Schneider Vancouver jerseys for free. I doubt they would want Sbisa. They would want Tanev or Gud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 Benning only called to be able to say he was "doing his job" - we can't afford it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 In other news: Water is wet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 I see it more likely they're looking at trying to get the Dallas pick or another pick in the top 10 over moving the 1st overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_Kerr Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 Tanman and our 2nd? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, J.R. said: In other news: Water is wet. Gonna e(5) that, Eklund? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUCKER67 Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 I wouldn't call it a rumour, more like a fact. Of course other teams will inquire. Can't see the Canucks making a real offer though, they'd probably have to trade the #5 and Horvat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 10 minutes ago, S'all Good Man said: Benning only called to be able to say he was "doing his job" - we can't afford it. Agreed. It's a bad idea anyway, since the guy we get at five could easily be better than the guy chosen at one. We can't afford it; it's not worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 I think it would be bigger news if he didn't receive any calls regarding the first overall pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 Hope it's not our GM. This ain't the yr to even think about it. Deep teams like Ana, CBJ, TBay & Winn are sensible to mull it over. ED is a further reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 The 1st pick will cost too much and result in Nolan or Hirschier, either of whom won't be worth it. 2nd overall might be a bit cheaper to acquire but again, not worth it. 3rd overall will be the cheapest but only get us Vilardi, but I think this will be the most "bang-for-your-buck" deal in terms of what we'd have to give up compared to what we'd get back. A trade with Philly though could be on the cards. They're a fringe playoff team with lots of good young defenders and centers, but could use wingers. TO PHI: 5th overall + Virtanen + Hutton TO VAN: 2nd overall + Morin/Sanheim Philadelphia get an NHL-ready defenceman so don't have to sit on Sanheim or Morin for much longer and a current/future powerforward who plays their style of hockey. They only drop 3 spots anyway. Canucks draft Nolan or Hirschier and get a future defenceman. Sanheim would be lovely but we might need to give up a bit more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 2 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: The 1st pick will cost too much and result in Nolan or Hirschier, either of whom won't be worth it. 2nd overall might be a bit cheaper to acquire but again, not worth it. 3rd overall will be the cheapest but only get us Vilardi, but I think this will be the most "bang-for-your-buck" deal in terms of what we'd have to give up compared to what we'd get back. A trade with Philly though could be on the cards. They're a fringe playoff team with lots of good young defenders and centers, but could use wingers. TO PHI: 5th overall + Virtanen + Hutton TO VAN: 2nd overall + Morin/Sanheim Philadelphia get an NHL-ready defenceman so don't have to sit on Sanheim or Morin for much longer and a current/future powerforward who plays their style of hockey. They only drop 3 spots anyway. Canucks draft Nolan or Hirschier and get a future defenceman. Sanheim would be lovely but we might need to give up a bit more. I'd rather just pick Glass. He's outscored Ryan Johansen, also a former Portland Winterhawk, in every single category comparing Johansen's draft year to Glass' draft year. We pick him and get a solid 1A centre to complement Horvat, who will be our 1B guy. Very similar to the setup we had him H. Sedin and Kesler when we were a contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 4 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: The 1st pick will cost too much and result in Nolan or Hirschier, either of whom won't be worth it. 2nd overall might be a bit cheaper to acquire but again, not worth it. 3rd overall will be the cheapest but only get us Vilardi, but I think this will be the most "bang-for-your-buck" deal in terms of what we'd have to give up compared to what we'd get back. A trade with Philly though could be on the cards. They're a fringe playoff team with lots of good young defenders and centers, but could use wingers. TO PHI: 5th overall + Virtanen + Hutton TO VAN: 2nd overall + Morin/Sanheim Philadelphia get an NHL-ready defenceman so don't have to sit on Sanheim or Morin for much longer and a current/future powerforward who plays their style of hockey. They only drop 3 spots anyway. Canucks draft Nolan or Hirschier and get a future defenceman. Sanheim would be lovely but we might need to give up a bit more. That makes literally no sense for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 41 minutes ago, J.R. said: In other news: Water is wet. I was going to post this, but I knew someone else would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUCKER67 Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 to DAL - Nugent-Hopkins and the #24 to EDM - #3 EDM then drafts Heiskanen (lord have mercy) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
on the cycle Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 1 hour ago, Tre Mac said: I think Tampa should inquire if they are still shopping Drouin, and if I was NJ I would be hella listening that call. Drouin is better than anyone in this years draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodycanuckleheads Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 35 minutes ago, Alflives said: Agreed. It's a bad idea anyway, since the guy we get at five could easily be better than the guy chosen at one. We can't afford it; it's not worth it. By this logic, why bother with high picks at all? Let's just trade them all for 6th rounders! I mean, hey, those 6th rounders can be just as good as the #1 overall pick! But, seriously, the #1 is worth more than the #5. A lot more. Suggesting it's not is ridiculous. And, that isn't just an opinion. We can actually figure out exactly how much more the pick is worth. [That link should really be stickied, seeing as absolutely no one understands the true value of draft picks around here] The #1 pick is worth a Top-3 forward or Top-2 defenseman. The #5 pick is only worth a Top-7 forward or a Top-5 defenseman. It's actually a humongous difference. So, yes, the #5 pick could be better than the #1. It almost surely won't, but it could... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.