Nuxfanabroad Posted June 11, 2017 Share Posted June 11, 2017 This thread's intended as an open-ended question, on all current 30 clubs. For starters, let's all agree there are probably about 8~10 teams with a surplus of good skaters, that'll likely have difficulty protecting all valuable assets with the 7-3-1 allotment. Examples like Ana, TBay, CBJ, Nash, Minny etc... Conversely, there are perhaps 8~10 weaker teams that would likely want to upgrade(at a reduced price) the quality of those same 11 guys they get to protect. Perhaps they have only 2 decent D-men, for example. Why wouldn't they send a meh skater, + decent prospect to one of the above teams for that 3rd quality D-man? The strong team will lose a skater anyways, so it's easy to see the mutual-incentive(both GM's). With this in mind, does anyone have (1)..example proposals that might fit into the pattern(weaker team exploiting stronger club's excess)? 2- Do you guys expect a bunch of these deals? 3- Any possibility Battman has frowned on this?(try to deter GM's from musical chair deals, down to the last scraps).. Vegas is his baby that might get buried in the sand dunes. He doesn't want every GM to try & rig his beloved hockey-casino. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.