khay Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, R3aL said: Bravo Bergevin wow really makes up for the PK trade I guess. Even if Serg ends up being top two d seems like a heavy win for Montreal For sure. Because Drouin is already a top 3 forward, whereas Sergachev being top 2 is anything but sure in my opinion. Wow, so all it took to get Drouin was Sergachev huh? Good prospect sure and I could be very wrong but I think Yzerman didn't get quite the same value back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Just now, mll said: They need a LD. On RD they already have Petry and Weber. Would we trade Juiolevi for Chucky? Ouch! That would hurt:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tre Mac Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Pretty depressing considering our equivalent deal would of been Juolevi and a 2nd for Drouin. I would of done that in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 4 minutes ago, Alflives said: Do the Habs trady Chucky now, to get a dman? Tanev maybe?? if they do go for Tanev (who they dont really need) it would be for a lot lot less than Galchenyuk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 1 minute ago, Eastcoast meets Westcoast said: I think they have a good young RHD in Juuslen and Serge is a fair price for Druoin. MTL probably tried floating Juulsen first, but if he can keep the production going in the AHL they may have a good player there. But for sure this is a quality for quality deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 1 minute ago, khay said: For sure. Because Drouin is already a top 3 forward, whereas Sergachev being top 2 is anything but sure in my opinion. Wow, so all it took to get Drouin was Sergachev huh? Good prospect sure and I could be very wrong but I think Yzerman didn't get quite the same value back? They don't have to protect Sergachev, so this also garauntees they keep Killorn as well. Another aspect to consider this year in trades. Plus cap space. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Would we trade Juiolevi for Chucky? Ouch! That would hurt:( They are probably looking for someone that is further along. They want to move on from Beaulieu. So on LD they have Jordie Benn, Emelin and they want to bring back Markov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 preet bad move for MTL. Serg is going to be more valuable, they lose a 2nd and also have to protect drouin while losing an exempt guy lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PassittoBoeser Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 13 minutes ago, Coconuts said: Holy crap, this is massive. This looks like it'll be good for both teams going forward, both teams get what they need out of this. I'm actually kinda surprised at how even this looks. Gonna be interesting to see what else Montreal does. Cue the Tanev for Galchenyuk trades now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kakanucks Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 So if Sergachev plays half the season with Tampa next season, it's a straight one on one deal. wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Hopefully this starts a trend of trades that make sense. Now its time for Tanev to go to Dallas for the #3oa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 6 minutes ago, Tre Mac said: Pretty depressing considering our equivalent deal would of been Juolevi and a 2nd for Drouin. I would of done that in a heartbeat. Doesn't solve anything. Just creates a need for defense instead of forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCNate Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Wow, I am not that high on Sergachev. This looks to be a great deal for MTL. Drouin is going to be a stud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 One of those deals that work really well for both teams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Drouin goes from golfing after practice and walking downtown Tampa without being recognized to the fishbowl of Montreal. Hope he can handle it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 Just goes to show the value of a potential top pair D man. Tampa gave up a proven top 6 forward for a guy that has not even established himself in the NHL yet. Maybe "dim" Jim is not as dim as some think when he took Juolevi at #5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, 73 Percent said: Doesn't solve anything. Just creates a need for defense instead of forward. I wouldn't have. Juolevi fits our timeline perfectly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 8 minutes ago, khay said: Wow, so all it took to get Drouin was Sergachev huh? Good prospect sure and I could be very wrong but I think Yzerman didn't get quite the same value back? Perhaps further evidence as to the value of selecting highly-touted dmen in the draft? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 3 minutes ago, Kakanucks said: So if Sergachev plays half the season with Tampa next season, it's a straight one on one deal. wow What if Sergachev runs back to play in Russia? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PassittoBoeser Posted June 15, 2017 Share Posted June 15, 2017 9 minutes ago, Ronaldoescobar said: if they do go for Tanev (who they dont really need) it would be for a lot lot less than Galchenyuk Actually probably not. Mtl is in win NOW stage. You have a veteran group of offensive forwards (excluding Drouin), Weber, Markov, and of course Price, these are not young bucks anymore. Tanev is one of the top 5 defensive RD in the league, he solidifies their second pairing, and his value is very high as he's only 26 (Galy is only 3 years younger). It is a trade thats actually very plausible give the market for a D like Tanev Drouin has proven he has elite potential in the NHL, and he got traded for a Dman with only 'potential' - Tanev is a PROVEN top 2 dman in the league, think about apples to apples here. Relative to Sergachev clearly Tanev should be able to command ALOT higher actually. This trade is good because it shows fans what Tanev's true value is when a "prospect" gets you Drouin. Perhaps people will realize JB knows what he's doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.