Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Elias Pettersson | #40 | C


-Vintage Canuck-

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, SergioMomesso said:

Can't wait until Boeser and EP40 are firing bullets from both sides of the ice on the PP. Not hacking on Henrik but it's going to be refreshing to see someone on the right side shoot a puck that the opposition will actually be worried about. 

Completely agree. Henrik was a wizard on that side but you’re right, everyone KNEW what the play was going to be and set up accordingly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, playboi19 said:

His shot is amazing, Boeser like.

Having two snipers in Boeser and Pettersson, the goals will be plenty. Really hope Dahlen makes it with his fellow-Swede. I'm not sure Pettersson starts at centre, but they'll eventually get him there. As for the Canucks not having enough centres, there's Horvat, Sutter and Beagle. And Granlund, Gagner and Schaller are acceptable in the bottom 6. I'm hoping they can make room for Gaudette too. 

 

Baertschi - Horvat - Boeser

Dahlen - Sutter - Pettersson

Leipsic - Gaudette - Virtanen

Roussel - Beagle - Eriksson

Gagner

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, stawns said:

I think it's safe to say he's not an NHL calibre cman.

I think it is safe to say you have a premature evaluation disorder (PED).   

woman-stopwatch-premature-ejaculation-pe

 

You can see a doctor or even a therapist who can work with you on both medication and coping mechanisms that may allow you to solve the issue allowing for a much more satisfactory hockey experience for both you and your partner(s).   PED comes in many forms which can include:

  • simple lack of experience and being "too excited" to have reasonable expectations
  • inability to enjoy the moment and instead are rushing to conclusions 
  • self-doubt/insecurity

Some or all of these could be playing a role in your own form of PED.   If you find that this continues to be a problem, perhaps only follow/comment on players who have finished their career so you can know the outcome.   While this is a form of self-pleasure, many find it less emotionally rewarding than the real thing (starting a relationship with a prospect as a rookie and enjoying the relationship as it grows and works towards the peak of their career) but for some who have trouble with commitment, it may just be what the "doctor ordered" for you.

 

Good luck with it.   I wouldn't wish PED on my worst enemy.   

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SergioMomesso said:

Can't wait until Boeser and EP40 are firing bullets from both sides of the ice on the PP. Not hacking on Henrik but it's going to be refreshing to see someone on the right side shoot a puck that the opposition will actually be worried about. 

With the addition of Hughes dishing pucks making plays  to Boeser and EP40 all game long.... ohhhhhh baby! 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Phat Fingers said:

Don’t see it a problem to have Sutter on his wing if Gaudette is able to take NHL starts.  

 

Two rookie centers. Sure, why the heck not. Guess Gaudette could still go AHL and they play Ganger with Pettersson then put Sutter on a shut down two way line.

Baer Bo Brock followed by 

 

A Gagner, Pettersson Eriksson line followed by a

Goldy/Granlund Sutter Virtannen

line

with a true shut down line of

Rousell Beagle Gaunce/Schaler. 

 

 

I smell playoff-spot contender! No BS!! 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said:

I think it is safe to say you have a premature evaluation disorder (PED).   

woman-stopwatch-premature-ejaculation-pe

 

You can see a doctor or even a therapist who can work with you on both medication and coping mechanisms that may allow you to solve the issue allowing for a much more satisfactory hockey experience for both you and your partner(s).   PED comes in many forms which can include:

  • simple lack of experience and being "too excited" to have reasonable expectations
  • inability to enjoy the moment and instead are rushing to conclusions 
  • self-doubt/insecurity

Some or all of these could be playing a role in your own form of PED.   If you find that this continues to be a problem, perhaps only follow/comment on players who have finished their career so you can know the outcome.   While this is a form of self-pleasure, many find it less emotionally rewarding than the real thing (starting a relationship with a prospect as a rookie and enjoying the relationship as it grows and works towards the peak of their career) but for some who have trouble with commitment, it may just be what the "doctor ordered" for you.

 

Good luck with it.   I wouldn't wish PED on my worst enemy.   

Now why did u have to stick an attractive Asian woman there?? CDC has had enough distractions...

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hutton Wink said:

 

All from one exhibition game, the first of the year.

 

Did you come to that conclusion from watching the rest of his game?  A centerman is not simply a winger who takes faceoffs, so what other aspects were "safe to say" not conducive to him playing center?  McDavid is a career 42% in the dot -- should he be put on the wing?

yes please

put mcdavid on the wing in games against the canucks

good idea

cheers :P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Phat Fingers said:

Don’t see it a problem to have Sutter on his wing if Gaudette is able to take NHL starts.  

 

Two rookie centers. Sure, why the heck not. Guess Gaudette could still go AHL and they play Ganger with Pettersson then put Sutter on a shut down two way line.

Baer Bo Brock followed by 

 

A Gagner, Pettersson Eriksson line followed by a

Goldy/Granlund Sutter Virtannen

line

with a true shut down line of

Rousell Beagle Gaunce/Schaler. 

 

 

then we have a better chance at winning the draft lottery (Jack Hughes, Cozens, Lafreniere), then bring in the young guns the following year....this might work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Kootenay Gold said:

There is of course, a chance you might be eating those words in a few years. Lol. I guess we will just have to see; but I will agree that he is no where near ready to take faceoffs at the moment.

 

I meant for this coming year, and likely a cpl more after that, and mostly regarding draws

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Phat Fingers said:

There is always a chance Stawns. 

 

Faceoffs is all about timing and reps.  He could get there. If anyone can learn a skill quickly EP40 is the guy.  It may take him more than one season but it would be a huge plus, don’t you think. 

I agree completely, and I expect, with help from MM, that he'll get there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rob_Zepp said:

I think it is safe to say you have a premature evaluation disorder (PED).   

woman-stopwatch-premature-ejaculation-pe

 

You can see a doctor or even a therapist who can work with you on both medication and coping mechanisms that may allow you to solve the issue allowing for a much more satisfactory hockey experience for both you and your partner(s).   PED comes in many forms which can include:

  • simple lack of experience and being "too excited" to have reasonable expectations
  • inability to enjoy the moment and instead are rushing to conclusions 
  • self-doubt/insecurity

Some or all of these could be playing a role in your own form of PED.   If you find that this continues to be a problem, perhaps only follow/comment on players who have finished their career so you can know the outcome.   While this is a form of self-pleasure, many find it less emotionally rewarding than the real thing (starting a relationship with a prospect as a rookie and enjoying the relationship as it grows and works towards the peak of their career) but for some who have trouble with commitment, it may just be what the "doctor ordered" for you.

 

Good luck with it.   I wouldn't wish PED on my worst enemy.   

You're a pretty good hockey guy, would you put EP at C this season?  He wasn't able to play there, last season in the SHL, and he's clearly lost in the faceoff circle.

 

Are you going to put him out for ozone draws so they can lose possession of the puck?  Faceoffs, along with defensive play, make up 95% of cmans game.  

 

Why are you and others so thinned skinned?  Players can have weak points, holes on their game and still be great players.  People were screaming for TG to put  Hank on the wing because he was bad in the dot.......hrs world's better than EP is right now on faceoffs.

 

So he's not an NHL cman yet?  It doesn't mean he can't score a bundle from the wing........positions really only apply in the d-zone and faceoffs anyway.

Edited by stawns
  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to be negative but we’re sounding like Edmonton fans here.

 

What was Pettersson’s FO% last night?  Like, 0%?  Pretty good chance he needs to either play wing or be paired with a winger who can at least hold their own in the dot.  

 

Winning 40+% in the NHL is a far cry from not winning a single draw in a prospects game.

 

(I’m not actually sure what his numbers were, but it sure didn’t look like he won many, of any.)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stawns said:

You're a pretty good hockey guy, would you put EP at C this season?  He wasn't able to play there, last season in the AHL, and he's clearly lost in the faceoff circle.

 

Are you going to put him out for ozone draws so they can lose possession of the puck?  Faceoffs, along with defensive play, make up 95% of cmans game.  

 

Why are you and others so thinned skinned?  Players can have weak points, holes on their game and still be great players.  People were screaming for TG to put  Hank on the wing because he was bad in the dot.......hrs world's better than EP is right now on faceoffs.

 

So he's not an NHL cman yet?  It doesn't mean he can't score a bundle from the wing........positions really only apply in the d-zone and faceoffs anyway.

This season?   I would start him on wing for sure.   Your statement sounded very "permanent".   At the same time, I am neither a coach or development individual with the Canucks so I, like all, will see what they do.   But me?   Yes, I would start him on wing with a C that can play wing too taking the Dzone draws but allowing EP to take some as the game wears on.

 

I am not thin skinned at all - I just found your absolute statement funny and responded as such.   If you are saying he isn't ready yet, then I probably will agree but not based upon one meaningless game.   Plus, I will let coaches decide as they are closer to this then you or I.

 

Cheers and sorry if you took my attempted humour at your absolute as being thinned skinned or similar...wasn't the intent so clearly a failed attempt on my part at some humour.   

  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said:

This season?   I would start him on wing for sure.   Your statement sounded very "permanent".   At the same time, I am neither a coach or development individual with the Canucks so I, like all, will see what they do.   But me?   Yes, I would start him on wing with a C that can play wing too taking the Dzone draws but allowing EP to take some as the game wears on.

 

I am not thin skinned at all - I just found your absolute statement funny and responded as such.   If you are saying he isn't ready yet, then I probably will agree but not based upon one meaningless game.   Plus, I will let coaches decide as they are closer to this then you or I.

 

Cheers and sorry if you took my attempted humour at your absolute as being thinned skinned or similar...wasn't the intent so clearly a failed attempt on my part at some humour.   

Context, in the broader discussion it was on his immediate placement.  If you read my comments around that one, you'd see I was talking about faceoffs only and that I felt he was capable of growing into the position.

 

He may or may not improve on faceoffs as he grows and gets stronger, but he also might not.  It doesn't mean he wouldn't be just as impactful on the wing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ilduce39 said:

Not to be negative but we’re sounding like Edmonton fans here.

 

What was Pettersson’s FO% last night?  Like, 0%?  Pretty good chance he needs to either play wing or be paired with a winger who can at least hold their own in the dot.  

 

Winning 40+% in the NHL is a far cry from not winning a single draw in a prospects game.

 

(I’m not actually sure what his numbers were, but it sure didn’t look like he won many, of any.)

I didn't see him win any.  He went fwd on one on the ozone, but that's as close as he got.  He did, however, play well defensively and even got pk time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • -Vintage Canuck- changed the title to Elias Pettersson | #40 | C
  • -SN- locked and unlocked this topic

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...