Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Kole Lind | RW


Canucksin2013

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said:

Why isn’t Button ranking Kole Lind?

 

 

Just figured I’d post this here so people don’t have to complain about the Lind omission in the other player threads.

Because then the list would be way too Canuck heavy.

 

Probably hard enough for TSN to list a Canucks prospect number 1.

 

Lind is as good as any of the forwards listed in the 30-50 range. Oh well he's a great prospect. Don't need a list to know that.

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

Because then the list would be way too Canuck heavy.

 

Probably hard enough for TSN to list a Canucks prospect number 1.

 

Lind is as good as any of the forwards listed in the 30-50 range. Oh well he's a great prospect. Don't need a list to know that.

That was my thought process as well. There are 31 other teams in this league and probably wanted to spread some wealth instead of dipping into our pool. There’s no doubt he deserves to be on it but this can be a good thing because we all know how Lind reacts to getting snubbed.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

Because then the list would be way too Canuck heavy.

 

Probably hard enough for TSN to list a Canucks prospect number 1.

 

Lind is as good as any of the forwards listed in the 30-50 range. Oh well he's a great prospect. Don't need a list to know that.

Ya, it's pretty awesome that we have 5 in the top 50 and that's without Lind who is outscoring Glass, Steel, Bellows, Dube and Rassmusen.  Hopefully Lind takes notice and it puts an even bigger chip on his shoulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ihatetomatoes said:

Ya, it's pretty awesome that we have 5 in the top 50 and that's without Lind who is outscoring Glass, Steel, Bellows, Dube and Rassmusen.  Hopefully Lind takes notice and it puts an even bigger chip on his shoulder.

actually and Gadjovich who made Canadian world junior when lind didnt.  And without dipietro who team Canada thought was the third best junior goalie in Canada.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like he was omitted due to unforseen circumstances. Button didnt expect to have that many good Canuck prospects already. 

 

To be fair though he is in his 4th WHL season compared to others producing at a similar rate in their 3rd.

 

Lots of upside with Lind though. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Derp... said:

Seems like he was omitted due to unforseen circumstances. Button didnt expect to have that many good Canuck prospects already. 

 

To be fair though he is in his 4th WHL season compared to others producing at a similar rate in their 3rd.

 

Lots of upside with Lind though. 

Linds first season was 6 games....I wouldn't really count that as a "season".  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Rollieo Del Fuego said:

Regardless we all know we have 6-7 of the top 50 prospects with Lind and Gadjovich and that is why we will be relevant as soon as next year!!!

 

The kids are going to knock down the door....

None of those kids will be difference makers next year. Only Gaudette might make the team and he'll be learning the pro game for 2 or 3 years before becoming a difference maker. 

 

None of the rest will be with the Canucks. Petterson is the closest and he'll need at least one year in Utica. When he does make the Canucks even then he'll take a year or two to become a difference maker. Horvat is an example. He's great but look how long it took him to get here. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WHL rocks said:

None of those kids will be difference makers next year. Only Gaudette might make the team and he'll be learning the pro game for 2 or 3 years before becoming a difference maker. 

 

None of the rest will be with the Canucks. Petterson is the closest and he'll need at least one year in Utica. When he does make the Canucks even then he'll take a year or two to become a difference maker. Horvat is an example. He's great but look how long it took him to get here. 

People are acting like that list is fool proof. How high was strome on that list and can still barely make an impact.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, WHL rocks said:

None of those kids will be difference makers next year. Only Gaudette might make the team and he'll be learning the pro game for 2 or 3 years before becoming a difference maker. 

 

None of the rest will be with the Canucks. Petterson is the closest and he'll need at least one year in Utica. When he does make the Canucks even then he'll take a year or two to become a difference maker. Horvat is an example. He's great but look how long it took him to get here. 

I highly doubt Pettersson spends any time in Utica

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiger-Hearted said:

I take it that you prefer Boeser with Pettersson and Lind with Horvat. Either or works for me. :)

Yeah I think our future RW depth starts with Boeser, from there we'll see how Lind and Virtanen develop but I'd imagine they'll be our middle 6 RW's in one order or another, down the line. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...