Nuxfanabroad Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Enjoyed cheering on Ottawa this spring - suggest we help them again. GM Dorion gave us great value for our buddy Burrows, so I wouldn't mind a deal that helps them next yr, & gives us more futures... Van: Edler(retain 1 mill AAV) Granlund..1 more yr, very cheap 900k 2018 3rd R pick OTT sends: Harpur ..6' 6'' D-man. Only 22. Seems stay-at-home, & fairly solid. Filip Chlapik ..Czech C, 2015 2nd rounder. Plays in Charlottetown with our D, Brisebois. Good jr stats, 2017 PO's it appears. 200 lb kid 2018 1st round(condition: if Ottawa finishes 22nd or lower, shift to 2019 1st, BUT cancel our 3rd r pick as well) - After this, our LH-D would be rather brutal(but size, at least!). So we sign a cheap FA D-man in July. We'd retain 2.3 mill(Lu, Badger & Eddie) next yr..wouldn't kill us. Right now Ottawa needs the space more than we do. - Karlsson's contract ends in 2 yrs, same as Edler. The timeline fits really well for Ottawa, contractually-speaking. Eddie at 4 mill, nicely replaces Methot. - I'd say Ott might be the best chance for Edler to accept a trade. Connections with EK & Burr. Their team has nice momentum going right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I like the idea of helping Ottawa if we can. That is, if Edler can help their playoff push. Also if they can afford to trade Harper and Chaplik. Not sure if I want to send Granlund. (I don't think anyone trades their firsts anymore). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlanB Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 OTT has no 2nd rounder in 2018 so HIGHLY unlikely they'd want to give up their 1st as well. The guys they're now looking to get rid of, we don't want - MacArthur, Ryan, PanHoof.... Ottawa is actually an older team the way they're structured right now - they're in a grey area it seems, not good enough imo to go into 'win now' mode and not young/skilled enough to be a force in 2-3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeydownUnder Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 2 hours ago, Hairy Kneel said: I like the idea of helping Ottawa if we can. That is, if Edler can help their playoff push. Also if they can afford to trade Harper and Chaplik. Not sure if I want to send Granlund. (I don't think anyone trades their firsts anymore). There have been 7 trades for first round picks in the last week alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monteeun Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 4 minutes ago, HockeydownUnder said: There have been 7 trades for first round picks in the last week alone I think that's only because some teams are trying to protect some of their players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 36 minutes ago, HockeydownUnder said: There have been 7 trades for first round picks in the last week alone Well not with us. Seems we get 2nd rounders only Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 26, 2017 Author Share Posted June 26, 2017 11 hours ago, Hairy Kneel said: I like the idea of helping Ottawa if we can. That is, if Edler can help their playoff push. Also if they can afford to trade Harper and Chaplik. Not sure if I want to send Granlund. (I don't think anyone trades their firsts anymore). On Chlapik, they got White & Logan Brown(two 1st rounders) knocking the door at C position. Young D? Ceci, Claessen & a few kids including the impressive Chabot. If we lost Granny & Edler: Baertschi.. Bo .. Eriksson Rodin/Boucher.. Henrik.. Goldobin Daniel.. Sutter.. Boeser/Virt Gaunce, Chappy, Dorsett, Molino, Megna (3 or 4 of these fwds head to Utica) Painful D: Hutton - Tanev Harpur - Gudbranson FA signing - Stecher Pedan - Biega (this D basically assures lotto-finish; but we could have 3 bruisers dressed for bigger rivals) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted June 27, 2017 Author Share Posted June 27, 2017 ^Lastly, would consider including MacArthur, in the above deal. But he has a NTC as well. We wouldn't need to retain on Edler. Granny(or Baer) would really help them too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HockeydownUnder Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 14 hours ago, Monteeun said: I think that's only because some teams are trying to protect some of their players. There is some truth to that. Last year had 3 first traded. Also 2 trades including swaps of first rounders and one trade that was a conditional second that became a first (Eaves) 13 hours ago, Hairy Kneel said: Well not with us. Seems we get 2nd rounders only Lol Definitely some truth to this as well. Benning's been pretty good with later rounds though so I don't really mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 Edler would be a phenomenal fit in Ottawa and might waive to go there even. I'd retain 50% for duration to sweeten the pot and maximize the return Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
komodo0921 Posted June 28, 2017 Share Posted June 28, 2017 I'd go for an Edler for Harper straight up deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted July 3, 2017 Share Posted July 3, 2017 On 2017-6-27 at 9:44 PM, komodo0921 said: I'd go for an Edler for Harper straight up deal. Or Brown, Chabot or White. What Ottawa really needs is more goals, adding Granlund would help keep them interested.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
komodo0921 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 4 hours ago, IBatch said: Or Brown, Chabot or White. What Ottawa really needs is more goals, adding Granlund would help keep them interested.... The addition of Gagne would seem to afford us someone like Granny as long as JB is willing to part with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick_fan Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 Sens: Edler Nucks: Phaneuf, Chlapik and 2018 1st Rather than losing Granny, maybe taking on a bad contract would get us a good prospect and a 1st This way our D wouldn't look so bad lol Plus I am pro trade Edler now since he snubbed Boesy numerous times at the end of the year. He can try snub Ottawa's kids lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted July 7, 2017 Author Share Posted July 7, 2017 2 minutes ago, Odjick_fan said: Sens: Edler Nucks: Phaneuf, Chlapik and 2018 1st Rather than losing Granny, maybe taking on a bad contract would get us a good prospect and a 1st This way our D wouldn't look so bad lol Plus I am pro trade Edler now since he snubbed Boesy numerous times at the end of the year. He can try snub Ottawa's kids lol That's interesting, OF. I was considering a similar suggestion(involving Pha9), but why would he waive?(seems the obvious question) If he & Edler would agree, would be great. Interesting twist: both teams retain 1 mill on each contract. In yr 3 & 4(Phaneuf has two extra yrs), it might be a PITA, that 7 mill-hit. Ottawa always leaves space anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.