oldnews Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, S'all Good Man said: Sure, the hard fore checking RW in the Burr/Hansen mould. It would be great if thats Jake, otherwise who do we have that could really be that? Certainly not Yakupov, unless he really commits to trying to play in a way he hasn't before. I think Virtanen is a great fit in due course, but Granny is serviceable in the meantime - he doesn't fit the cookie cutter of what would be ideal, but he's so adaptable and intelligent - they looked good together last year and really at this point there's no real urgency to find the perfect fit for the Sedins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Just now, oldnews said: I think Virtanen is a great fit in due course, but Granny is serviceable in the meantime - he doesn't fit the cookie cutter of what would be ideal, but he's so adaptable and intelligent - they looked good together last year and really at this point there's no real urgency to find the perfect fit for the Sedins. +1 ( i'm out of them already today ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckswincup8 Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 nothing to lose but lots to gain if he ever find his scoring touch again Sign him benning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 How great would it be both for us and for Yak if he couldlive up to the expectations of a #1 overall pick and rub it in Edmonton's face multiple times a year for the next 5+ years? Conclusion: Please sign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E. Lindros Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Play granny with the twins Baer bo eriksson Goldy sutter yak- soft but skilled with a 2way center. Goldy is a slick passer Dorsett gaunce/ufa boeser- we role 4 lines, decent minutes + boeser on pp1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
missioncanucksfan Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 2 hours ago, Warhippy said: That's all well and good, but why wouldn't Bergevin give him $2 million for a show me contract with galchenyuk? Drouin/Galchenyuk/Yakupov Could be a very solid line I think the coach would just quit if he was forced to ice that line 5v5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slegr Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I don't agree with folks who say nothing to lose by singing Yak. He's soft and known as lazy defensively. We have a limit to how many guys we can sign. He would eat into that limit. Besides, we have our quota of soft players. This team needs toughness. More meat and potatoes please. If a team with Baertschi, Goldobin, Hutton, Stecher, Tanev, etc ever make it to the post-season, a guy like Yakupov would just make us that much softer. A great name for Scrabble points maybe but I'd pass on signing him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Go for it. A clear upgrade over Gaunce, Megna, Chaput, Cramarossa, Shore, Skille (probably, plus younger)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 12 minutes ago, Slegr said: I don't agree with folks who say nothing to lose by singing Yak. He's soft and known as lazy defensively. We have a limit to how many guys we can sign. He would eat into that limit. Besides, we have our quota of soft players. This team needs toughness. More meat and potatoes please. If a team with Baertschi, Goldobin, Hutton, Stecher, Tanev, etc ever make it to the post-season, a guy like Yakupov would just make us that much softer. A great name for Scrabble points maybe but I'd pass on signing him. Good thing is this time period isn't about making the playoffs. It's about taking as many flyers on draft picks and young players as we can in order to find future stars. The odds may be low with Yakupov, but there's absolutely nothing that should be stopping us on taking short term risks on players like this. Especially if the player actually wants to play here. If we're giving chances to guys like Boucher and potentially Weal, Yakupov is worth a chance too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 If Yakupov was happy with a 1M deal then I'd sign him. Looks like JB is going to ink him or Weal, but Yak has to be happy with a two-way contract because Utica could really use the help. Give the other 4-6M to Kulikov or Alzner or Franson. Grigorenko wasn't qualified either who would be another low risk high reward signing. Not bad on the 4th line anyway. I'd just go with Yakupov and Alzner/Kulikov for now: Sedin - Sedin - Granlund Baertschi - Horvat - Boeser Goldobin - Sutter - Yakupov Boucher - Gaunce - Dorsett/Labate Dahlen Edler - Tanev Alzner - Stecher Hutton - Gudbranson Biega Pedan Subban Those wingers will probably shift around a lot over the season but Yakupov can start in our bottom-6, he can play gritty if he's visible, and if he strikes gold, he can play in our top-6, even with the Sedins. I expect to see Dahlen impress and end up with the twins full time but there's still a spot there for Yakupov. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Why not? It's by far the nicest city in North America. Would love to see him sign here. No lack of potential... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Boudreau Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 2 hours ago, gobi said: I think Yakupov is the beggar in this instance. Maybe. But I think he has some stones trying to make an NHL career and exhausting his opportunities instead of just going the KHL route as many Russians do right away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted June 27, 2017 Author Share Posted June 27, 2017 7 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: If Yakupov was happy with a 1M deal then I'd sign him. Looks like JB is going to ink him or Weal, but Yak has to be happy with a two-way contract because Utica could really use the help. Give the other 4-6M to Kulikov or Alzner or Franson. Grigorenko wasn't qualified either who would be another low risk high reward signing. Not bad on the 4th line anyway. I'd just go with Yakupov and Alzner/Kulikov for now: Sedin - Sedin - Granlund Baertschi - Horvat - Boeser Goldobin - Sutter - Yakupov Boucher - Gaunce - Dorsett/Labate Dahlen Edler - Tanev Alzner - Stecher Hutton - Gudbranson Biega Pedan Subban Those wingers will probably shift around a lot over the season but Yakupov can start in our bottom-6, he can play gritty if he's visible, and if he strikes gold, he can play in our top-6, even with the Sedins. I expect to see Dahlen impress and end up with the twins full time but there's still a spot there for Yakupov. You forgot Loui Eriksson, unless your assumption is that he would be traded. Not sure if there are many teams that would be interested in his contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainhorvat Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 If benning can get him at 2yrs @ 1.65 per season, would be fair contract for for both sides. I think he's worth a shot especially if he grew up a canucks fan and Bure was his favourite player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Boudreau Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 Brett Connolly on the market as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 1 minute ago, captainhorvat said: If benning can get him at 2yrs @ 1.65 per season, would be fair contract for for both sides. I think he's worth a shot especially if he grew up a canucks fan and Bure was his favourite player. Is Yak a UFA, or would we have to trade with St. Louis? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 Just now, Alflives said: Is Yak a UFA, or would we have to trade with St. Louis? UFA - he was not qualified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainhorvat Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 Just now, Alflives said: Is Yak a UFA, or would we have to trade with St. Louis? STL didn't qualify him so he becomes a UFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 With the current state of the team I wouldn't mind giving him a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 3 minutes ago, mll said: UFA - he was not qualified. 2 minutes ago, captainhorvat said: STL didn't qualify him so he becomes a UFA. Thanks. I always felt Yakupov tried his hardest, both being fit, and on the ice. I would love for us to give him a chance. I do think it's hard to have him and Goldobin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.