12-16-FG Posted July 2, 2017 Share Posted July 2, 2017 So, JB tried to send ? to Fla for Demers. How about this. To Fla : Gudbranson To Van : Mathison and 2nd pick 2018. It sounds like Fla wants Guddy back, and if thats the case it has to cost them a bit. In mathison Van would get solid player, good numbers and 23. And more importantly a 2nd RD pick, that may or may not be used to trade up, in a good draft year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted July 2, 2017 Share Posted July 2, 2017 Except Matheson > Gudbranson. Speculation on what was offered is a worthwhile discussion though. I'm thinking with JB going out and grabbing some centres that Sutter was potentially offered. I know it's rumored that Tallon wants Gudbranson back, but I think moving Demeres is more pressing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toews Posted July 2, 2017 Share Posted July 2, 2017 I wish the Panthers were dumb enough to do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunjabiCanucks Posted July 2, 2017 Share Posted July 2, 2017 Rename this as proposal, you threw me off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12-16-FG Posted July 2, 2017 Author Share Posted July 2, 2017 good point, it could have been Sutter.I have a different thought about him, but it involves him going away. And i should have said proposal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckmen84 Posted July 2, 2017 Share Posted July 2, 2017 I like the idea of acquiring Mathison. I have made a thread in the past suggesting a Tanev swap but if Florida wants Guddy back we should take advantage of that some how. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted July 2, 2017 Share Posted July 2, 2017 It'd have to be more like Gudbranson + 2nd for him. I'd rather keep Guddy for now, he's our only physical presence on the blueline for the forseable future. I think Matheson is a lefty, so I'd much rather try and work a deal around maybe Edler. Edler + 2nd round pick for Matheson enough? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckmen84 Posted July 2, 2017 Share Posted July 2, 2017 7 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: It'd have to be more like Gudbranson + 2nd for him. I'd rather keep Guddy for now, he's our only physical presence on the blueline for the forseable future. I think Matheson is a lefty, so I'd much rather try and work a deal around maybe Edler. Edler + 2nd round pick for Matheson enough? I Agree. Edler won't waive but i would prefer that deal as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6string Posted July 3, 2017 Share Posted July 3, 2017 I thought Florida deals were exclusively Mike Gillis deals only :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.