Nuxfanabroad Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Here's something for summer-blather. Wanted to keep it strictly between the two teams(for obvious 2013 reasons). I valued Marky at the high 2nd, just taken(ballpark..likely reasonable). Leaving both teams with intact-tandems. Van: Horvat(RFA..you know he'll get PAID!), Elias Petterson, Markstrom(3 yrs of 3.6 mill) NJD: Schneids(5 remaining yrs of 6 mill/per) Hischier Jesper Boqvist #36OA pick(Swedish C) Question is simple. Yea or nay?? This is an illustration of valuing what we have, vs imagining what things may have looked like. FTR, I go with what we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 ah damn not another bo for schneids proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItsMillerTime Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Makes no sense for both teams. Also Predraft the trade would be. Horvat, 5th overall, Markstrom for 1st Schneider and 36th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted July 4, 2017 Author Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 minute ago, ItsMillerTime said: Makes no sense for both teams. Also Predraft the trade would be. Horvat, 5th overall, Markstrom for 1st Schneider and 36th. 2 C's & a 'tender, both ways. Just sort of a hypothetical..to illustrate value. Before draft, or after. Doesn't matter to me. As I said..wouldn't do it. Sort of curious if anyone would? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 No thanks. Schneider had a down year last season, and was not as good as Markstrom. Plus, Petersson is going to be better than Heisvher. And we give away Bo for a second! Okay, sounds fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckmen84 Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 22 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: Van: Horvat(RFA..you know he'll get PAID!), Elias Petterson, Markstrom(3 yrs of 3.6 mill) NJD: Schneids(5 remaining yrs of 6 mill/per) Hischier Jesper Boqvist #36OA pick(Swedish C) Schneids 31. Fits the rebuild eh? No. Acquire Schneids and let Demko rot in the AHL ? Horvat is untouchable. Pettersson has amazing upside and could be better than Hischier especially playing with Dahlen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted July 4, 2017 Author Share Posted July 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Alflives said: No thanks. Schneider had a down year last season, and was not as good as Markstrom. Plus, Petersson is going to be better than Heisvher. And we give away Bo for a second! Okay, sounds fair. Y'see Alfy..now you'll sleep soundly tonite! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12-16-FG Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 No thanks, a definite not so sound thought pattern there. Even hypothetically. and corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted July 4, 2017 Author Share Posted July 4, 2017 10 minutes ago, 12-16-FG said: No thanks, deffinatly not a sound thought pattern there. Even hypothetically. So you AGREE with me that we shouldn't do this, & your reading-comprehension is a work-in-progress? Why ty! :^) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12-16-FG Posted July 4, 2017 Share Posted July 4, 2017 Just questioning your ability to understand, been there done that with Snieds. And also understanding that your probably looking at Hischier as the player you covet. Not that there is anything wrong with displaying your thoughts, but rather been there, don't want it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted July 4, 2017 Author Share Posted July 4, 2017 5 minutes ago, 12-16-FG said: Just questioning your ability to understand, been there done that with Snieds. And also understanding that your probably looking at Hischier as the player you covet. Not that there is anything wrong with displaying your thoughts, but rather been there, don't want it back. No need to explain..all are welcome at this donut shop. I'm not sure if you understand my intent, train-of-thought, or conclusion. Though it's quite likely only I think these things are important! :^) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.