Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Enter Search Term. Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. If no results appear, use Enter to do a full site search.
Forum Closure ×
Canucks Community
Forum Closure

GDT: Canucks vs. Penguins, Saturday, November 4th, 2017 @ Rogers Arena 7 PST on CBC

Qwags

By Qwags
in Canucks Talk

Recommended Posts

Pete M Canucks Second-Line

Pete M

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Mattrek said:

 

No, Green gives enough time to a certain set up to see if it works or not before willing to try to change it up and improve. This is what we want. We've faced basically the full spread of the types of teams we've faced so now he knows to try something new. Let's not forget he's a new coach on a new team. He's going to take time figuring out what works and what doesn't, but the fact alone that he isn't switching every game in a panic to find something that works is miles better then Willie.

 

This is what normal coaches do. They come up with a line they think would work, play it against all types of opposing teams and decides from there what adjustments will be made. Green isn't dumb, he's seen the PP's abysmal showing, but he wanted to give it a good chance before switching. Lines take time to grow chemistry, so it's smart of him to stick with it.

 

Now he knows it's not working, he knows Boeser is a shooter from watching his play and put the two and two together we have Boeser at the point or on the left side for a one timer or accurate wrister. #InGreenWeTrust

The Calgary game was the lowest of all lows for the Sedin's on the PP....TG has to see this...they had a 5-3, 4-3 and 5-4 with no shots and a goal against.

 

The Sedins kill the PP no matter who are with them. They pass it and don't shoot and then lose the puck...and when they do shoot, their shot is weak.

Can't score if you don't shoot the puck...lots of good things can happen when a player shoots the puck and out man the opposition in front of the net. They don't do this.

 

If they have Boeser on the PP, then the objective should be to set up Boeser for the shot because the guy can snipe...if they start passing back and forth, then lose the puck...I'm going to lose my #4$@!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davathor Canucks First-Line

Davathor

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Mattrek said:

 

No, Green gives enough time to a certain set up to see if it works or not before willing to try to change it up and improve. This is what we want. We've faced basically the full spread of the types of teams we've faced so now he knows to try something new. Let's not forget he's a new coach on a new team. He's going to take time figuring out what works and what doesn't, but the fact alone that he isn't switching every game in a panic to find something that works is miles better then Willie.

 

This is what normal coaches do. They come up with a line they think would work, play it against all types of opposing teams and decides from there what adjustments will be made. Green isn't dumb, he's seen the PP's abysmal showing, but he wanted to give it a good chance before switching. Lines take time to grow chemistry, so it's smart of him to stick with it.

 

Now he knows it's not working, he knows Boeser is a shooter from watching his play and put the two and two together we have Boeser at the point or on the left side for a one timer or accurate wrister. #InGreenWeTrust

 

No, he reads CDC for our brilliant ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...