Would Canucks had been a dynasty, had Jim Benning been drafting for Mike Gilles

[spook007]

7 minutes ago, TheGuardian_ said:

Because so many talk about prospects and he future as certainties but they are just "what if's" as well.

 

Looking to the past is a method of avoiding the same mistakes in the future, at east it should be. There is no hockey university degree given so the only was to learn is either trial and error or looking at the past to find mistakes and trying to not repeat them.

+1 Guardian 

[6string]

8 hours ago, bloodycanuckleheads said:

You said it would take 'several' more years after today.  That's at least 7 years total.

Your quote ( cut n paste ), " Benning only needs a total of 7 years worth of extremely-high draft-picks to turn it around"?

 

Thankyou.

[bloodycanuckleheads]

Jesus, learn to count!  You said it would take 'several' more years.  Several means at least three.  Benning started getting his high picks in 2014.  2014 to now is 4 years (2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017).  Add those four to the (at least) three more - and that equals 7.  Minimum.

[The Lock]

13 hours ago, bloodycanuckleheads said:

You said it would take 'several' more years after today.  That's at least 7 years total.

 

1 hour ago, bloodycanuckleheads said:

Jesus, learn to count!  You said it would take 'several' more years.  Several means at least three.  Benning started getting his high picks in 2014.  2014 to now is 4 years (2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017).  Add those four to the (at least) three more - and that equals 7.  Minimum.

I'm glad there are people here who know how to maff!

[Davathor]

Jam banning doesn't make mistakes like Mik Gelles

[CanadianRugby]

14 minutes ago, Davathor said:

Jam banning doesn't make mistakes like Mik Gelles

[The Lock]

As far as a topic goes.... a dynasty?....

 

We need to win a cup first before that d word's even used! lol

[Davathor]

4 hours ago, CanadianRugby said:

 

[King Heffy]

Gillis would still have made enough bad trades to cripple the team.