The_Rocket Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Calgary is pretty set on their right side D for the next 3 years at least, so they’d probably be willing to give up Adam Fox, a rhd who is putting up a ppg in NCAA, for the right price. What dies clagary need? Well they don’t trust lack as a backup at all and they have a very weak bottom 6. Anyway canucks can take advantage? One possibility I’ve come up with: to CGY Nilsson Gaunce Draft pick (not sure which round) To VAN Fox less valuable draft pick basically we fill a couple of Calgary’s needs, and the draft picks are there to even out value. Other options could be grandlund or gagner instead of Gaunce, depending on what type of player cgy wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReggieBush Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 I have a feeling Fox is untouchable. He is a damn good player, and will play in the NHL for a long time. I would love him in a Vancouver Jersey, but I don't see it as a realistic option. But hey, the Lames gave us granny and baer for scraps, so maybe there is a chance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUCKER67 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 So, would we get Lack back in the trade? Not much size with this guy (same frame as Stecher), but he can sure put up the points, maybe someone for the PP? Gotta wonder though, will he become a Subban or a Stecher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Rocket Posted November 20, 2017 Author Share Posted November 20, 2017 6 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: So, would we get Lack back in the trade? Not much size with this guy (same frame as Stecher), but he can sure put up the points, maybe someone for the PP? Gotta wonder though, will he become a Subban or a Stecher? I would only take lack if the flames wanted us to, but the Main logic behind the goalie part of the trade is Demko could be the backup. Yeah his small size adds risk to the trade, which is why I only suggest bits and pieces cgy would need, rather than a core player. Midigates our losses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Blight Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 I think Vancouver has moved to the bottom of the Calgary preferred trading partners list. I would not want another undersized d-man on the right side unless he is a real PP wizard. ....don't think he has shown that yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 don't we already have this type of player in Subban? Maybe for a guy like Gaunce, but nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quantum Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Honestly, He's a Harvard guy and the Harvard NCAA players are starting to become notorious for playing their 4 years before ditching the team that drafted them to play elsewhere. Just look at Jimmy Vesey, Alex Kerfoot, (and to a lesser extent, Patrick McNally). There's a good chance that Adam plays 4 years at Harvard and then hits free agency... going to the team that is the best for him to make the NHL right away. He'd be great in Vancouver but, I dont see it. We've got Adam Gaudette, Will Lockwood, Elias Petterson, Kole Lind, and Jonathan Dahlen in the pipeline so I think we're in good shape for the future, honestly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead80 Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 12 minutes ago, Quantum said: Honestly, He's a Harvard guy and the Harvard NCAA players are starting to become notorious for playing their 4 years before ditching the team that drafted them to play elsewhere. Just look at Jimmy Vesey, Alex Kerfoot, (and to a lesser extent, Patrick McNally). There's a good chance that Adam plays 4 years at Harvard and then hits free agency... going to the team that is the best for him to make the NHL right away. He'd be great in Vancouver but, I dont see it. We've got Adam Gaudette, Will Lockwood, Elias Petterson, Kole Lind, and Jonathan Dahlen in the pipeline so I think we're in good shape for the future, honestly. What do these guys have to do with attempting to acquire a defenseman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where's Wellwood Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 13 minutes ago, Quantum said: Honestly, He's a Harvard guy and the Harvard NCAA players are starting to become notorious for playing their 4 years before ditching the team that drafted them to play elsewhere. Just look at Jimmy Vesey, Alex Kerfoot, (and to a lesser extent, Patrick McNally). There's a good chance that Adam plays 4 years at Harvard and then hits free agency... going to the team that is the best for him to make the NHL right away. He'd be great in Vancouver but, I dont see it. We've got Adam Gaudette, Will Lockwood, Elias Petterson, Kole Lind, and Jonathan Dahlen in the pipeline so I think we're in good shape for the future, honestly. Fox is a D. Though I will admit when I entered the thread, I was thinking about Dane Fox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted November 20, 2017 Share Posted November 20, 2017 Backup goalies aren't worth nearly that much. Gaunce at this point is just a throw-in. I also don't want Demko sitting on the bench up here. Let him stay down in Utica on a good team and get lots of games in. This doesn't work for either team . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 I wanted Adam Fox in the 3rd round where we picked Will Lockwood. At the time I didn’t know Will and I’m okay with our selection but Adam Fox is good at hockey. He’s worth more than his actual value. Those guys don’t get traded very often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 16 hours ago, ReggieBush said: I have a feeling Fox is untouchable. He is a damn good player, and will play in the NHL for a long time. I would love him in a Vancouver Jersey, but I don't see it as a realistic option. But hey, the Lames gave us granny and baer for scraps, so maybe there is a chance I agree with this post but I will say the Baer trade wasn't for scraps, it's looking like they may have a very good young dman in that trade. As for Granlund that is certainly a win for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 16 hours ago, Canadian Clay said: I would only take lack if the flames wanted us to, but the Main logic behind the goalie part of the trade is Demko could be the backup. Yeah his small size adds risk to the trade, which is why I only suggest bits and pieces cgy would need, rather than a core player. Midigates our losses This probably wouldn't be enticing to Calgary would it? I'm pretty sure Calgary would rather just keep him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Subban for him 1 for 1.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 16 hours ago, Where's Wellwood said: Fox is a D. Though I will admit when I entered the thread, I was thinking about Dane Fox There's a guy that never got a fair shake in the AHL. He lit up the ECHL every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 1 hour ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Subban for him 1 for 1.... But why would Calgary do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted November 21, 2017 Share Posted November 21, 2017 Gaudette for Fox straight up? We have centers (Pettersson, Horvat, Sutter), Calgary need a future stud center. Gaudette is arguably a top college center, Fox a top college D-man and we certainly need a potential star D-man. Risky but I'd consider it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 11 hours ago, Ryan Strome said: But why would Calgary do that? Why would Calgary trade him in the first place? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 Maybe throw Goldobin at them? Have Goldy and Fox as the two main components and build around that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted November 22, 2017 Share Posted November 22, 2017 32 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Why would Calgary trade him in the first place? I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.