The_Rocket Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 The two big-fish, free agents of 2016. Identical 6 yr 36 million dollar contracts for “top 6” left wingers. Would you swap, 1 for 1, Eriksson for Lucic? Lucic: probably good for 40-50 points, big hits, will drop the gloves, weak defensively, slow Eriksson: probably 30-40 points, sound defensively, top pk winger in Canucks, “soft”, not very big, a couple years older who would you rather have? Personally, I think I’d rather stick with Eriksson. Edit: correction - as others have pointed out, Lucic sign for 7 years, Eriksson for 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.