Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

(Proposal) VAN - TOR


Recommended Posts

VAN:

Travis Dermott 

2018 2nd Round Draft Pick

 

TOR:

Erik Gudbranson

2018 3rd Round Draft Pick

 

  • With Botchford reporting that the Canucks are looking for a 22-23 year old player & a draft pick in return, this deal seems pretty realistic.
  • JB overpays a little with the 3rd rounder, & the Canucks get back a solid D prospect, along with an additional second rounder this year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, DudePerfect said:

VAN:

Travis Dermott 

2018 2nd Round Draft Pick

 

TOR:

Erik Gudbranson

2018 3rd Round Draft Pick

 

  • With Botchford reporting that the Canucks are looking for a 22-23 year old player & a draft pick in return, this deal seems pretty realistic.
  • JB overpays a little with the 3rd rounder, & the Canucks get back a solid D prospect, along with an additional second rounder this year.

How about we keep Guddy?  Why would we help out TO, and give them a deal too?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Roberts said:

I swear, every single proposal involving Toronto has Gudbranson going to the Maple Leafs..

It is to be expected any of our pending FA's should be the high majority of players we hear about or should be looking to deal in a trade.

 

yes it is redundant but thats how it goes. Only have to wait 2 more months till trade deadline!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone posted a one for one deal with tor involving liljigren a lily toe while ago which At the time I was meh about but now I’m warming up to it 

 

to tor: gudbranson

 

to van: liljegren 

 

Obviously him slipping 10+ spots in the first round is alarming but it fills needs for both teams. Although, This deal would make Toronto “all in” this season so I’m not sure if that’s what they’re thinking about right now 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yotes said:

It is to be expected any of our pending FA's should be the high majority of players we hear about or should be looking to deal in a trade.

 

yes it is redundant but thats how it goes. Only have to wait 2 more months till trade deadline!!

still a bit weird how everyone wants gudbranson only to go to Toronto

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fanuck said:

Aren't the Laffs up against the cap?  Any cap in would have to = cap out meaning no trades involving roster guys for prospects. 

I can see Polak or another salaried guy coming back.

No way should we be including any of our picks

One of Dermott/Neilson+conditional 2nd (SJ or Tor)+Polak should suffice

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, billabong said:

Someone posted a one for one deal with tor involving liljigren a lily toe while ago which At the time I was meh about but now I’m warming up to it 

 

to tor: gudbranson

 

to van: liljegren 

 

Obviously him slipping 10+ spots in the first round is alarming but it fills needs for both teams. Although, This deal would make Toronto “all in” this season so I’m not sure if that’s what they’re thinking about right now 

I was screaming at home for JB to trade into the 10-15 range to select Liljegren when I saw him slipping that far.. Then the leafs took him at 17th and I cried a little.

I believe he made quite a stir at the pre-season so I doubt they would trade him but my god I'd be straight up pumped to have him in our system.

 

Then again if Benning is planning to pitch for Dahlin then maybe getting a bunch of picks to throw together a trade up deal makes more sense looking forward to the draft... Yet I think any team trading down from Dahlin would be a damn fool lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, billabong said:

Someone posted a one for one deal with tor involving liljigren a lily toe while ago which At the time I was meh about but now I’m warming up to it 

 

to tor: gudbranson

 

to van: liljegren 

 

Obviously him slipping 10+ spots in the first round is alarming but it fills needs for both teams. Although, This deal would make Toronto “all in” this season so I’m not sure if that’s what they’re thinking about right now 

 

 

But Liljegren is the best D-men in the draft and they got the steal of a lifetime. Surely it will cost more than that to acquire that gem.

 

And for those that will definitely miss the obvious sarcasm, here is my sarcasm disclaimer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, billabong said:

Someone posted a one for one deal with tor involving liljigren a lily toe while ago which At the time I was meh about but now I’m warming up to it 

 

to tor: gudbranson

 

to van: liljegren 

 

Obviously him slipping 10+ spots in the first round is alarming but it fills needs for both teams. Although, This deal would make Toronto “all in” this season so I’m not sure if that’s what they’re thinking about right now 

 

 

I wish, but no chance in the world that the Leafs give up their top defensive prospect for a rental of Erik Gudbransson.  They wouldn't do it if we added our second round pick.  At this point I don't know if they'd even trade him for Juolevi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to add 1st round picks to give Benning flexibility to move up or make trades at the draft.

 

If they want Gudbranson, do it for their 1st round pick and stop there.  Right now it would be 21st overall.  That would be great added to our 1st and 2nd.  We could use those to move up if we don't win the lottery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, billabong said:

Someone posted a one for one deal with tor involving liljigren a lily toe while ago which At the time I was meh about but now I’m warming up to it 

 

to tor: gudbranson

 

to van: liljegren 

 

Obviously him slipping 10+ spots in the first round is alarming but it fills needs for both teams. Although, This deal would make Toronto “all in” this season so I’m not sure if that’s what they’re thinking about right now 

 

 

Toronto is tight on cap space, I don't think they can take on Gud's 3.5M.  They are also maxed out at 50 contracts so maybe van takes on a bad contract in this proposal.  I'm guessing it takes a huge overpayment to  acquire Liljegren.  Might need to throw in a higher draft pick too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...