J.I.A.H.N Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Ok, pretty simple............... Gud wants a new contract worth in the area of 4 to 5 million So............4.25 million for 5 years........no NTC VS Tryamkin 5.0 million for 7 years.........................no NTC Which one do you take or do you pass? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hatedkid666 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 tryamkin easily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 I don't risk that money on Tryamkin yet, but to me, it seems like he has far more value than Guddy. More offense and more physical. He does lack the leadership of Guddy though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Both! Trade Hutton and Edler if you can. Acquire or draft a PP QB or both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted January 3, 2018 Author Share Posted January 3, 2018 People might be asking why I used such big numbers or length of contracts, but I was trying to compare them to what Gudbranson is wanting...maybe not what he is going to get, but......RHD are hard to find......and he was not a minus tonight despite his minutes, against a decent club......I thought he played as good as anyone! Better than most! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Gimme Groot! He's more mobile and can probably play on either side while being physical. Probably a true minute-muncher and presence, reminiscent of Chara. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted January 3, 2018 Author Share Posted January 3, 2018 I have added another question to the poll...... Contract threshold...................would pay more........? Let's say half a million($500,000 per year) more to either player's contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted January 3, 2018 Author Share Posted January 3, 2018 Certainly a bigger risk / reward on Tryamkin.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drive-By Body Pierce Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 In my opinion Gudbranson will seek, and get, 5M+ per year on an extended contract somewhere in the NHL for what he brings to the table. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Guddy personally. Shorter term, less dollars. Tram is interesting though. 5 mil isn't terrible. I feel like he was well on his way to being a top 4 d-man, if he wasn't already towards the end of the season. Personally if we had both that'd be pretty great. Tram and Guddy on two different pairs. We likely aren't scoring a lot of goals from the back end but we'd be a physical presence. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucklehead73 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 I'd sign both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 No comparison, if deciding between the two. Get something Gud..then try, Try again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Money Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 I don't think you'd need to pay THAT much for Tryamkin. But I'd certainly offer him something like 2 years, $3.5 million as a bridge to come over and show he's committed to the team, leading to an eventual longer term deal. Gud has gotta go. Even if he could stay healthy, I wouldn't want to commit over $4M to him. But with the health concerns added, it's a complete non-starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 9 hours ago, Phil_314 said: Gimme Groot! He's more mobile and can probably play on either side while being physical. Probably a true minute-muncher and presence, reminiscent of Chara. I knew Groot would catch on as a nickname, it's too gud not to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 What? Has Tryamkin suddenly changed his mind and now wants to play for the Canucks? No? Think I'll stick with Guddy. At least he wants to play in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuardian_ Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Groot for sure, younger and maybe this time around he gets to play relaxed, knowing he made the team. Willie got a lot of blame for the way Groot was played but I wonder if it is not management telling the coach how to play certain players? I say his because Virtanen is getting played the same way, benching without any obvious reasons. Groot was a rookie, Guddy had 5 years in the NHL under his belt and the comparison wasn't really close, Groot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 30 minutes ago, TheGuardian_ said: Groot for sure, younger and maybe this time around he gets to play relaxed, knowing he made the team. Willie got a lot of blame for the way Groot was played but I wonder if it is not management telling the coach how to play certain players? I say his because Virtanen is getting played the same way, benching without any obvious reasons. Groot was a rookie, Guddy had 5 years in the NHL under his belt and the comparison wasn't really close, Groot. That's how Virt was played when Green had him in Utica last season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 5 mil for 7 for Nik? I think thats a lot for a guy who did still need a lot of work and didn't demonstrate a lot of commitment to the team. In this scenario Guddy is the right choice, yes he has holes but with the right partner he's very effective and its also a much more tradable contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Tryamkin can move the puck better in the defensive zone. Physicality-wise, Tryamkin is also better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted January 3, 2018 Share Posted January 3, 2018 Definitely Try. With the size and mobility he has he will be great. Lots don't remember Chara at that age and he didn't look all that glamorous then as he would have probably still been an islander if they had the vision of what he'd become. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.