missioncanucksfan Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 As per Bruce Garrioch Makes sense.... Gudbranson will be moved to obtain assets before he we lose him to Free Agency, and also move Hutton to make room for Juolevi next year. I hope this brings us 2-3 decent high draft picks and some useful prospects and a useful asset to finish out the year and maybe beyond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Shuffle off to Buffalo, for 2nd & a 3rd! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 I really hope, if we move either Hutton or Gudbranson, the return is picks and prospects. I will not be pleased if the return is a player (or players) who are over 24 and said to help us in the now, and are already developed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 He won't probably get too much given his recent play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Canucks are likely listening to offers on more players than just him. The players who aren't available is a shorter list than the ones who are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 I don't think both Hutton and Guddy go. I think it'll be one or the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Actually a pick & prospect(for Utica) would prob be kosher/acceptable. Also send back Goldy & Bouch..them guys need help, down there. EDIT: Just saw Bouch is back there(snipin' 2 today) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester13 Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 I'm not surprised at this, but I doubt they trade both Hutty and Guddy. Just throwing this out there, but could the Nucks be thinking about adding OJ to the mix as soon as this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toni Zamboni Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 throw in edler as a bonus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NuckForReal!!! Posted January 7, 2018 Share Posted January 7, 2018 Would rather move edler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Cue the media barrage dumping on our players and lowering their values. JB did well with Hanson and Burr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down by the River Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 34 minutes ago, -AJ- said: He won't probably get too much given his recent play. He's been playing? But yeah, this would be the epitome of selling low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Westcoasting Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 11 minutes ago, NuckForReal!!! said: Would rather move edler What?? I enjoy all his crappy play! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 I think that statement probably holds true for most of our players. We do need to have some games to see if Holm is any good before he is buried behind Juolevi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 42 minutes ago, Alflives said: I really hope, if we move either Hutton or Gudbranson, the return is picks and prospects. I will not be pleased if the return is a player (or players) who are over 24 and said to help us in the now, and are already developed. I'd be happier with all prospects unless its a potential lotto ticket. I don't know what Hutton could return on his own tho.... maybe a project F? or maybe a Dorsett replacement? Hutton seems to me to be more valuable as part of a multi-player deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny in Vancouver Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 He said that he hates the Leafs so hopefully for his sake, it's not the Leafs. I believe he was a Senators fan so maybe another Senators prospect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Can we just sit him the rest of the year and just show teams hightlites of his first two years here? He's been brutal at times this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 So keeping him out of the lineup will increase his value? Not very good asset management by this team once again. Doubt we'll get much for him. Maybe a third? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 Ya. Maybe a third or a similar d man back but a righty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodycanuckleheads Posted January 8, 2018 Share Posted January 8, 2018 27 minutes ago, rekker said: Cue the media barrage dumping on our players and lowering their values. Is it possible to lower their value below where it already sits?... Like, seriously, we've got pretty close to the worst defense in the league - who on Earth is going to give us good value for d-men we don't even want? We aren't getting a bunch of high picks and decent prospects for Guds and Hutton. We waited a year too long with Hutton and now his value is only a fraction of what it was. And, guds, well... We aren't even getting back half of what we paid for him. Like always, our management falls in love with our players. We never sell-high, we always wait and sell-low instead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.