Alflives Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, Isam said: Probably can move boldy up to the second tier And move Kakko down a tier. Hughes is by far the best prospect of the bunch. He's on a level of his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isam Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 You can mention turcotte along with hughes and kaako in the first tier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isam Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 7 minutes ago, Alflives said: And move Kakko down a tier. Hughes is by far the best prospect of the bunch. He's on a level of his own. Nope. Kaako is legitimately up there. He is on par with atleast barkov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, Isam said: Nope. Kaako is legitimately up there. He is on par with atleast barkov If Kakko is another Barkov then that's different. I don't see him at that level though. If he is, then getting him would definitely make Bo expendable. We could move Bo for a young (top four) D man. EK - Hughes OJ - (the guy we trade Bo for) Stecher - Hutton Bull dog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 8 minutes ago, Alflives said: If Kakko is another Barkov then that's different. I don't see him at that level though. If he is, then getting him would definitely make Bo expendable. We could move Bo for a young (top four) D man. EK - Hughes OJ - (the guy we trade Bo for) Stecher - Hutton Bull dog What part of his game do you think isn't legit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isam Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 8 minutes ago, Alflives said: If Kakko is another Barkov then that's different. I don't see him at that level though. If he is, then getting him would definitely make Bo expendable. We could move Bo for a young (top four) D man. EK - Hughes OJ - (the guy we trade Bo for) Stecher - Hutton Bull dog Still see on the wing with us. A better comparison would be rantenen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isam Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 My bad.^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 36 minutes ago, Isam said: Still see on the wing with us. A better comparison would be rantenen We definetly need top six winger. Other than Bo, who else do we have that's a ligit top six winger? Maybe, in a couple years, Madden or Lind, but really who else is there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Off_The_Schneid! Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 38 minutes ago, Alflives said: We definetly need top six winger. Other than Bo, who else do we have that's a ligit top six winger? Maybe, in a couple years, Madden or Lind, but really who else is there? Bo is a Center you must have meant Brock prob only Baertshi who’s career may be done, Lockwood could surprise, gadjovich has a chance I agree with you id be taking a winger in this draft, with the solid play of Byram it could force a really skilled winger to drop to us really depends on the teams picking ahead of us since most drafts there is some changes due to the lottery I’d say LA : Hughes ( need a center ) Colorado : Kakko ( couldn’t be a better pick for them and I could see them taking Kakko if they pick 1st overall ) Detroit: Center NJ: ? Maybe Byram Anaheim: BPA 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble 6 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 minute ago, Horvat is a Boss said: Ya, and Kakko might go ahead of Hughes. i hope there are stupid GM’s like last year’s draft, and Jack falls to us like Quinn did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 On 3/4/2019 at 4:58 PM, ItalianCanuck1 said: Do you think teams would give up a first rounder for a prospect who in a 2016 redraft would be pick maybe around 15/20? So basically you trade your pick for a player with same value but two year older.. (I’m genuin curious, don’t want to sound polemic ) It depends whos there at that pick. I think some teams would. My list is going to change really soon but right now my #15 is Broberg. If he was the next up I'd trade him for Juolevi. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 (edited) would not be surprised at all if we took Solderstrom even if we were in the top 5, his game is so dynamic. For such a young kid, his game looks very polished for a dman. Edited March 6, 2019 by CRAZY_4_NAZZY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 (edited) On 3/4/2019 at 7:53 PM, Dixon Ward said: I believe that, for the franchise's sake, with our great scouting, we should always take BPA. The value of the asset is hugely important. We need to have as much value as we can. Free agency and trades can always fill in the blanks, but if you continually draft for position and not BPA you will degrade the overall value of your assets. My point being, there is no point discussing who we should take until we know where we will pick. Absolutely true... we are not in a position, where we can pick for position. Way too many blanks... BPA all the way.... If/when the situation improves, the better the player the better the return in eventual trades. Edited March 6, 2019 by spook007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenhodgejr Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 6 hours ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said: would not be surprised at all if we took Solderstrom even if we were in the top 5, his game is so dynamic. For such a young kid, his game looks very polished for a dman. I really like his game and I think he would be a great addition to our team. Interesting how he brings up Lidstrom and he seems very confident of his skills. I think his skill would compliment our power play with a guy like Juolevi. Soderstrom reminds a bit of Rasmus Sandin in how he seems to play a solid all around game. Probably with a little more offence than Sandin. Benning often talked about how a team should be rebuilt from the net out. We could still use some help on defence and potentially goal. If we did pick for positional need this draft we would avoid building a team like Edmonton. 1st - Bryam or Soderstrom 2nd- Spencer Knight 3rd - R shot Defenceman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildwood12 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 14 hours ago, Alflives said: If Kakko is another Barkov then that's different. I don't see him at that level though. If he is, then getting him would definitely make Bo expendable. We could move Bo for a young (top four) D man. EK - Hughes OJ - (the guy we trade Bo for) Stecher - Hutton Bull dog Move Bo Horvat??? Alf i’m So glad you are not the GM. Don’t make me come over there! LOL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vannuck59 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 On 3/4/2019 at 6:39 PM, Kanukfanatic said: Virtanen is not getting back a top ten pick in return....sorry. No chance in hell at this point. Teams don't pay a top 10 pick for a 3rd line winger. And I love Jake. I hope he can keep developing into a power forward. But if he is gonna do it he only has a couple years left imo. Edit: the plus you would have to give up to get that top ten pick would have to be VERY significant. And the Canucks, imo, still don't have the kinda depth they would need to do that kind of move. You may be right it depends on the plus and Virtanen , (Hutton and Virtanen) (Goldobin and Virtanen) ( Markstrom and Virtanen) there are all kinds of combinations you can get a top 10 pick with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 1 hour ago, vannuck59 said: You may be right it depends on the plus and Virtanen , (Hutton and Virtanen) (Goldobin and Virtanen) ( Markstrom and Virtanen) there are all kinds of combinations you can get a top 10 pick with. Um, might still be tough to land a top 10 with those combos... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble 6 Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 Draft Byram. Trade Tanev (50% retained) and take back a cap dump for a mid 1st and draft Soderstrom. Juolevi - Hughes Byram - Soderstrom That's a top-4 that could support a contender. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyoung Posted March 6, 2019 Share Posted March 6, 2019 3 minutes ago, Horvat is a Boss said: Draft Byram. Trade Tanev (50% retained) and take back a cap dump for a mid 1st and draft Soderstrom. Juolevi - Hughes Byram - Soderstrom That's a top-4 that could support a contender. Im on the draft Byram wagon, but wouldn't mind keeping tanev and Edler with guys like Byram and Hughes coming up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now