Ojibwa72 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 I've said it before but not Nylander. I want Kasperi Kapanen from the Leafs.I wonder if Tanev would get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vannuck59 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 17 minutes ago, Ojibwa72 said: I've said it before but not Nylander. I want Kasperi Kapanen from the Leafs.I wonder if Tanev would get it done. Kapanen and Holl plus a second for Tanev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ojibwa72 Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 2 hours ago, vannuck59 said: Kapanen and Holl plus a second for Tanev That would be Ideal. Would do even without the second maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 3 hours ago, vannuck59 said: Kapanen and Holl plus a second for Tanev Holl is not much younger than Tanev with minimal NHL experience...2 games last year. He has little value imo. Kapanen doesnt have a ton of value either. This deal would not make me want JB to pull the trigger AND I am a PRO trade Tanev person...if the deal is right that is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beni Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 I'd rather have Marner over Nylander myself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted October 6, 2018 Share Posted October 6, 2018 49 minutes ago, beni said: I'd rather have Marner over Nylander myself So would Toronto I'd imagine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beni Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 4 hours ago, Jimmy McGill said: So would Toronto I'd imagine. haha yea, he is going to be darn good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannydog Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 toronto needs tanev more than van needs nylander. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 2 minutes ago, Dannydog said: toronto needs tanev more than van needs nylander. TO would love to have both Tanev and Guddy. Their defence is all offence, and no defence. We don’t need WM. We have Goldy, and Baer, who play a very similar game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 1 hour ago, Alflives said: TO would love to have both Tanev and Guddy. Their defence is all offence, and no defence. We don’t need WM. We have Goldy, and Baer, who play a very similar game. If Goldy can continue to play well and if Dahlen can impress and jump up to the NHL this year or next full time. I think its going to leave Baer as trade bait at some point. I would love for us to somehow use Baer as part of a deal to get Boone Jenner, but doubt Columbus bites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAVA-1 Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 If we are to trade Tanev to Toronto I would rather it was for K.Kapenen, A. Nielson and A. Borgman and a pick (2nd would be nice but a 3rd more likely). We get a good player in Kapenen who is odd man out, Nielsen who is big, tough and has some offence as well and Borgman who has off. upside as well. We could also add a Hainsey and Poulliot swap in there to help cap space out for them but not sure they would go that big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 25 minutes ago, JAVA-1 said: If we are to trade Tanev to Toronto I would rather it was for K.Kapenen, A. Nielson and A. Borgman and a pick (2nd would be nice but a 3rd more likely). We get a good player in Kapenen who is odd man out, Nielsen who is big, tough and has some offence as well and Borgman who has off. upside as well. We could also add a Hainsey and Poulliot swap in there to help cap space out for them but not sure they would go that big. Kapanen is the only okay piece in that deal. TO would run away with that trade. I wouldnt want us to make that deal, but thats me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaramel MacKhiato Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 Tanev Lind 3rd for Nylander Zaitsev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vannuck59 Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 8 minutes ago, Top Sven Baercheese said: Tanev Lind 3rd for Nylander Zaitsev As I said before Tanev for Kapanen, Holl and a 2nd . Holl is a lot better d-man than you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 44 minutes ago, Top Sven Baercheese said: Tanev Lind 3rd for Nylander Zaitsev Take out Lind, and put in Baer. Take out Nylander and put in Marner. Take out Zaitsev, and put in a sack of rocks. Now I’m happy:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dungass Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 5 hours ago, Top Sven Baercheese said: Tanev Lind 3rd for Nylander Zaitsev Sounds suspiciously like the 2018 version of Ballard, Raymond and 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 11 minutes ago, Dungass said: Sounds suspiciously like the 2018 version of Ballard, Raymond and 3rd. Nylander is a lot like Raymond. That’s an excellent comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 6 hours ago, Dungass said: Sounds suspiciously like the 2018 version of Ballard, Raymond and 3rd. No no no, it's Ballard, Raymond, and a 1st! But our 1sts are a little more valuable these days so please don't trade our 1st to Toronto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 Why Vancouver shouldn’t chase Nylander article I believe the Canucks could benefit from a Nylander trade. But when I read the article, I was struck by two things. First, I never thought of offersheeting Nylander as that would cost the Canucks dearly including firsts in a rebuild. I am even more against offersheeting Nylander now. The other part is what it would cost to get holdout-Nylander; definitely a first round pick (see above), and either Hughes. Both items are deal breakers. Dahlén is highly likely going to replace Goldobin when he’s ready and the Canucks will have a new Swedish dynamic duo. Which leaves is with Juolevi. I have a strong feeling that Juolevi will make the NHL as a T4D. Beyond that I would be surprised. I could see Juolevi be part of such a deal. However, the talk on Nylander is that his dad feels like he got screwed when he was an NHLer and so he’s guiding his son in the same direction when really, the only solution to the Nylander camp and any team he’s on, is a bridge contract. Asked a few Leafs fans about a Tanev for Nylander trade and they JUMP. at the idea. The question is, can daddy Nylander be managed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted October 8, 2018 Share Posted October 8, 2018 8 minutes ago, Me_ said: Why Vancouver shouldn’t chase Nylander article I believe the Canucks could benefit from a Nylander trade. But when I read the article, I was struck by two things. First, I never thought of offersheeting Nylander as that would cost the Canucks dearly including firsts in a rebuild. I am even more against offersheeting Nylander now. The other part is what it would cost to get holdout-Nylander; definitely a first round pick (see above), and either Hughes. Both items are deal breakers. Dahlén is highly likely going to replace Goldobin when he’s ready and the Canucks will have a new Swedish dynamic duo. Which leaves is with Juolevi. I have a strong feeling that Juolevi will make the NHL as a T4D. Beyond that I would be surprised. I could see Juolevi be part of such a deal. However, the talk on Nylander is that his dad feels like he got screwed when he was an NHLer and so he’s guiding his son in the same direction when really, the only solution to the Nylander camp and any team he’s on, is a bridge contract. Asked a few Leafs fans about a Tanev for Nylander trade and they JUMP. at the idea. The question is, can daddy Nylander be managed. If the Leafs thought WM was a core piece on a Cup team they would have already come to a long term deal. Clearly the Leafs don’t see WM as a part of a Cup team. I don’t think we should go for such a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.