RogersTowell Posted September 1, 2018 Share Posted September 1, 2018 (edited) The failings of the rankings aren't really anything to get worked up with. As 48mph Hutton Wink pointed out, it's great to have our prospects underrated. Many of us have a fair idea of where our prospects rank. The thing is, there's no point in getting upset with an article that sees things differently. Likely they looked at some stats on hockeydb or eliteprospects and went from there. Then again, this IS CDC, where lynch mobs form over performances in individual games, so I guess in the end, it's whatever floats yer boat. For me it's a pretty casual thing - there's the writer's list, and there are a few things I think he might be wrong about, but in the end, only time will tell. What I can say is that if even media hacks are starting to make lists with Canucks prospects overly represented in the top 50, it's a great time to be a Canucks fan. Especially so many Hobey Baker winners and finalists (and future winners!) and SHL scoring leaders and U20 record holders and character guys who lead their team to advance to the SHL and much more. It's a glorious time to be a Canucks fan, I've never seen any time like it in terms of prospects. Now here's hoping they are developed properly to make the transition to the NHL. Edited September 1, 2018 by RogersTowell change 48mph to Hutton Wink 2 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.