Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[Proposal] Van - Car


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Toews said:

If the Canes move Pesce, it will be for a consistent scoring threat.

 

I don't even want to know what their ask will be. Suffice to say that ain't nearly enough.

They already have Aho, Teuvo, Svech, Nino, and Necas. The success Ferland had with this group, they might want a young player of a similar mould. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Bure_Pavel said:

To Van: Brett Pesce

 

To Carolina: Virtanen, Hutton, 2019 2nd

 

 

Virtanen has been much improved overall this season and will be a great middle six player for years to come.  Hutton has proven to be a very solid player this year and is more commited than ever.  The second round is where we got Demko and Woo.  

 

That seems like an awful lot for Pesce.  He is marginally better than Hutton imho.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dixon Ward said:

Virtanen has been much improved overall this season and will be a great middle six player for years to come.  Hutton has proven to be a very solid player this year and is more commited than ever.  The second round is where we got Demko and Woo.  

 

That seems like an awful lot for Pesce.  He is marginally better than Hutton imho.  

I actually think Hutton's showing much more upside than Pesce.

The only way I'd see Pesce making sense is if Tanev's on the move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Bure_Pavel said:

To Van: Brett Pesce

 

To Carolina: Virtanen, Hutton, 2019 2nd

 

Canucks Defense in 2 years

 

Edler - Pesce

Hughes - Gudbranson 

Juolevi - Stecher

 

Vancouver's future top 4

 

Hughes - Pesce

Juolevi - Woo

People might not like the idea of losing JV, but the reality is at some point unless free agency can fix some of our future RHD defense woes (and that’s both risky and expensive), the trade market might be the better to also be used, and quality for quality.  JV is not that high on the quality list but is one of our better B assets with upside still.  Not a bad trade proposal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Virtanen is not a 'B' asset...

 

Overpayment for Pesce. He's a solid top 4 but isn't 'wow' enough to be a consistant top 2. Definitely a good player to target, but not with this offer. Canes don't need Hutton in the package, Canucks should not be thinking of shipping out JV, and the 2nd is worth more than a throw in pick.

 

Canucks really have no need to trade for a D before having a look at free agency (unless they're specifically targeting a Pesce or other guy who may get moved this deadline).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...