Dazzle Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Here is another example of NHL referees simply being a MORON. THIS is a penalty. Furthermore, the smirk on Mantha's face afterward ought to be suspendable, but we know that won't happen. Mantha's probably real proud of himself of doing a headshot from behind. What a dirty player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyman109 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 5 minutes ago, Dazzle said: Here is another example of NHL referees simply being a MORON. THIS is a penalty. Furthermore, the smirk on Mantha's face afterward ought to be suspendable, but we know that won't happen. Mantha's probably real proud of himself of doing a headshot from behind. What a dirty player. how does this relate to the Canucks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 7 minutes ago, Dazzle said: Here is another example of NHL referees simply being a MORON. THIS is a penalty. Furthermore, the smirk on Mantha's face afterward ought to be suspendable, but we know that won't happen. Mantha's probably real proud of himself of doing a headshot from behind. What a dirty player. 2 mins, at the very most. I'm fine with no penalty on it though......prefer it actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, mikeyman109 said: how does this relate to the Canucks? Referees are not bias, but incompetent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeyman109 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Just now, Alflives said: Referees are not bias, but incompetent. They are Bias also..lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted February 18, 2019 Author Share Posted February 18, 2019 Just now, stawns said: 2 mins, at the very most. I'm fine with no penalty on it though......prefer it actually I'm very surprised you'd say this. It's a cross check penalty in the numbers for starters. Also, the principal point of contact is the head. Not sure why you disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 1 minute ago, stawns said: 2 mins, at the very most. I'm fine with no penalty on it though......prefer it actually Ya, I hate the Flyers too. I really like this Mantha kid. He’s a big boy, who has skill, and plays mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris12345 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Pretty soft world we live in. No fight after either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 4 minutes ago, Dazzle said: I'm very surprised you'd say this. It's a cross check penalty in the numbers for starters. Also, the principal point of contact is the head. Not sure why you disagree. Because hockey shouldn't be for p#$$ies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Goblin Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 The world needs to accelerate development in creating AI robot referees so that every call is 100% correct. Shouldn't be too difficult to create an artificial intelligence robot smarter than humans. Here's a list of movies proving such a thing: Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope (1977) The Terminator (1984) Wall-E (2008) Blade Runner (1982) I, Robot (2004) Westworld (1973) Metropolis (1927) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 the refs have to do this from time to time to other teams so they can keep doing what they do to us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 12 minutes ago, Green Goblin said: The world needs to accelerate development in creating AI robot referees so that every call is 100% correct. Shouldn't be too difficult to create an artificial intelligence robot smarter than humans. Here's a list of movies proving such a thing: Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope (1977) The Terminator (1984) Wall-E (2008) Blade Runner (1982) I, Robot (2004) Westworld (1973) Metropolis (1927) Already made: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 So this is in Canucks talk because we should be happy it didn't happen to a Canucks player? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fanuck Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 29 minutes ago, Dazzle said: I'm very surprised you'd say this. It's a cross check penalty in the numbers for starters. Also, the principal point of contact is the head. Not sure why you disagree A. How can it be a cross check if Mantha only has one hand on his stick? Not possible. B. How can it be 'in the numbers' if main contact is to the head? Again, not possible to principaly hit numbers and head, it's one or the other. What I really don't like is how Mantha hits him knowing full well there's 3min or so left in the game and he'll likely not be held accountable on the ice - that's pretty Weasley imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhukini Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Shh you're gonna stop the blind ref pic from happening in the PGT the next time the Canucks lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaNuCkSLoUiE23 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 The little *%*@ didn’t even answer the call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
189lb enforcers? Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 Sign him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikkim Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Fanuck said: A. How can it be a cross check if Mantha only has one hand on his stick? Not possible. B. How can it be 'in the numbers' if main contact is to the head? Again, not possible to principaly hit numbers and head, it's one or the other. What I really don't like is how Mantha hits him knowing full well there's 3min or so left in the game and he'll likely not be held accountable on the ice - that's pretty Weasley imo. Ah but if you watch the video again you will see all the players have little numbers on there helmet so... he is kinda getting hit in the numbers lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spook007 Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 13 minutes ago, 189lb enforcers? said: Sign him. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squamfan Posted February 18, 2019 Share Posted February 18, 2019 1 hour ago, Alflives said: Referees are not bias, but incompetent. lol watch the 2011 finals again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.