King Heffy Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 9 minutes ago, Canuck Surfer said: Somewhere Ottawa fans are saying to themselves that Brady Tkachuk is probably as good as what they would have picked at 4 this year? Naaaaaaaah! Problem is by the time Ottawa gets enough prospects to have an NHL team, Tkachuk will be a UFA. Doesn't matter how good they are at rebuilding when their owner is too cheap to even care about winning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 9 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: If Dach is available at 10th overall I will sell my left testicle on the black market and donate the proceeds to this forum. No chance, imo and the Canucks shouldn't be looking at a cman anyway, imo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlwaysACanuckFan Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 13 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: I'm just going to assume we'll never win 1st overall. And still win the Stanley Cup regardless. The year we selected EP feels like we won 1st 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Just now, stawns said: At the risk of being a broken record.......Caufield all day 110% agree. Caufield has as much upside as Jack Hughes, but doesn’t get the same hype. I’m hoping JB drafts again for elite skill, and takes Caufield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, hammertime said: Didn't know Byram was Russian? byram is slated to go 7th on the list. I guess my comment wasn't obvious to most like I thought it would be seeing as the list appeared twice on the last page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 11 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: I like how the GM's all sit there like they even know what an algorithm is. "Got it JB?" JB: Yeah algorithmic something.. yeah yeah I got it. " 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Kanukfanatic Posted April 10, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Alflives said: The more complicated the system the easier it is to “adjust” the results. I thought you died?? Welcome back. 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanisleryan Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, stawns said: No chance, imo and the Canucks shouldn't be looking at a cman anyway, imo. I agree, LW or D.... Or maybe trade the pick to fill that need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FireGillis Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 (edited) 23 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Problem is it's not balls, its computer generated numbers. It's not like the 649. It is balls and like 6/49. Here's the 2015 vid. The process is there are 1000 4 balls combination and each team is assigned a set of numbers proportional to their lottery odds, so last overall would be assigned 185 combinations for 18.5%. Edited April 10, 2019 by FireGillis 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, 48MPHSlapShot said: Quote me on it if you want Cookiefest is that you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Mikko Rantanen taken 10th overall in 2015. In a redraft would have probably gone top 4. Some people seem to think you can only get elite players in the top 3, which isn't true. Ask New Jersey who they would have taken 1st overall in 2017. Might not be Hischier now. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darius Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Just now, stawns said: At the risk of being a broken record.......Caufield all day I was kinda trying to goad you into a discussion :-) I see the exceptional skill there but im afraid he’ll be a gerbe/Byron caliber guy... absolutely nothing wrong with those guys but could he be a core piece? I’d love if they nab him at 10 and he turns out to be a home run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, stawns said: No chance, imo and the Canucks shouldn't be looking at a cman anyway, imo. Especially a big, lumbering slow one. Dach is like the guy Philly got second overall in Petey’s draft. I forgot the guy’s name, because he’s forgettable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Canuck Surfer said: Somewhere Ottawa fans are saying to themselves that Brady Tkachuk is probably as good as what they would have picked at 4 this year? Naaaaaaaah! Absolutely. This years draft is nothing like last years, more like two years ago. Last year there were slam dunks past fourth right up to where we picked in Hughes. They actually made the right decision...and have the player in the NHL going into his sophomore year when this years fourth could be a bust or be two or three years away. Edit: in the end Duchene might bring them something back but it wasn’t their finest hour, depends what happens with this years playoffs and conditional picks. They have something like 17 picks coming their way with what they have plus EK, Stone and Duchene..could be one of the faster rebuilds and they also draft well and have for some time... Edited April 10, 2019 by IBatch 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Crossbar Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, stawns said: No chance, imo and the Canucks shouldn't be looking at a cman anyway, imo. That was one too many imos, imo. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 3 minutes ago, AlwaysACanuckFan said: The year we selected EP feels like we won 1st That year NJ picked 1st overall, so hopefully the same luck this year? Maybe NJ should just trade us the 1st overall for our 10th overall and our list on who we would pick at #10. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Watching Dach playing for Saskatoon. Looks good. I've worked there a few times, my new fav team! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, stawns said: No chance, imo and the Canucks shouldn't be looking at a cman anyway, imo. Can never have enough centers, and from what I can tell most are absolutely capable of playing the wing. That being said, he ain't gonna be there at 10. Guessing he goes anywhere from 4 to 7. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duc_evo Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 We need to key in on a D-man, Soderstrom or Heinola 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 31 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Problem is it's not balls, its computer generated numbers. It's not like the 649. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now