Captain Canuck #12 Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 (edited) On 1/13/2021 at 11:55 AM, Where's Wellwood said: Edited January 17, 2021 by Captain Canuck #12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RogersTowell Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 On 1/14/2021 at 2:51 PM, 5Fivehole0 said: This is because these tests are widely inaccurate. They have an astounding amount of false positives. For example, my brother and his family have had 3 tests each. My brother tested positive, negative positive; His wife tested positive negative negative; Their child tested negative positive negative. They all live in the same house, and have been quarantining to their best ability. Reports like this are common. The tests are actually remarkably accurate at what they detect, which is viral rna. The rate of 'false positives' is exceedingly low, but the rate of false negatives, especially at the early stage of infection, can be higher since the quantity of viral rna available at that time is low. rt-PCR uses reverse transcriptase to multiply the amount of rna to detectable levels. There is a factor called the 'cycle count' which is the number of doubling times used. The more doubling times, the more rna that is available to be detected. Early in the infection, false negatives can be as high as 100% on day 1, but that drops quickly each day as the virus multiplies. That's why multiple tests are often done. There's a balancing act to be done with cycle count - too high and you get too many false positives weeks after the infection is over, too low and you get false negatives well into the infectious period. A positive test means you definitely have viral rna in your system in the spot the swab was taken. It might mean that you are infectious or it might mean you were exposed and are no longer infectious. To be safe, you are quarantined for 14 days as that is typically the length required to no longer be infectious after a positive test. https://www.fda.gov/media/134920/download 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blömqvist Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 According to the Canucks Instagram account, Miller is practicing with the team in Calgary today. I would assume he will play tomorrow unless there is another issue that we are unaware of. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted January 17, 2021 Share Posted January 17, 2021 5 minutes ago, Blömqvist said: According to the Canucks Instagram account, Miller is practicing with the team in Calgary today. I would assume he will play tomorrow unless there is another issue that we are unaware of. Hope not but ... if not it 's probably "undisclosed" "out of an abundance of caution" "in line with protocol" blah blah blah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 JT Miller moved into 109th in all-time Canuck scoring with his assist tonight. 108. Peter Schaefer LW 194 37 40 77 109. J.T. Miller LW 72 27 50 77 110. Jiri Slegr D 154 12 65 77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckleHorse Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 I can hear Don calling him a beauty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Miller inching his way towards the top 100 in all-time Canuck scoring 107. Michel Petit D 226 24 57 81 108. J.T. Miller LW 75 29 51 80 109. Peter Schaefer LW 194 37 40 77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 17 minutes ago, Wilbur said: Miller inching his way towards the top 100 in all-time Canuck scoring 107. Michel Petit D 226 24 57 81 108. J.T. Miller LW 75 29 51 80 109. Peter Schaefer LW 194 37 40 77 Still over a point-per-game! What a player. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilbur Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 55 minutes ago, -AJ- said: Still over a point-per-game! What a player. Don't think anyone expected that after the trade. I think most of us would've been happy with a 60pt player. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 20 minutes ago, Wilbur said: Don't think anyone expected that after the trade. I think most of us would've been happy with a 60pt player. I think I predicted something around 56 points or something. It ended up being such a big deal for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 53 minutes ago, Wilbur said: Don't think anyone expected that after the trade. I think most of us would've been happy with a 60pt player. By the ridiculous reaction, you'd think 'most' were expecting a 30-40 point third liner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 2 hours ago, aGENT said: By the ridiculous reaction, you'd think 'most' were expecting a 30-40 point third liner I think most didn't really know who JT Miller was. The reaction happens before the evaluation sometimes I think. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 8 hours ago, -AJ- said: I think most didn't really know who JT Miller was. The reaction happens before the evaluation sometimes I think. Oh, I'm well aware of how CDC operates Didn't stop a great number of yahoos from making absolute claims out of said sheer ignorance. Even worse was the media doing the same thing. They're paid to not be completely ignorant, panicky arsehats. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kootenay Gold Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 1 hour ago, aGENT said: They're paid to not be completely ignorant, panicky arsehats. Me thinks they are being paid too much 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeneedLumme Posted January 29, 2021 Share Posted January 29, 2021 22 hours ago, -AJ- said: I think I predicted something around 56 points or something. It ended up being such a big deal for us. I predicted he would have a career year if he got to play with Petey. He had already demonstrated in Tampa that he was a point per game guy when he got top quality linemates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 Not liking Miller's overall game and behaviour. Extremely lazy plays and just making a lot of dumb players. This is the first time i've been frustrated with him since acquiring him, he visually doesn't look the same. Looks like he gives up in the middle of plays. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNucks1 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 JT Miller angry - https://streamable.com/lc0uqj 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Buzzsaw* Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 Nothing wrong with Miller that a new coach wouldn't be able to fix. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrCanuck94 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 (edited) 2 hours ago, TNucks1 said: JT Miller angry - https://streamable.com/lc0uqj Play whistle to whistle. Stop complaining in the middle of a play. Yell after the play or while you're hustling back if you need to. Just not a fan of how he stopped focusing on the play and it could've potentially led to another goal, with how things are going. Edited February 3, 2021 by MrCanuck94 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Outsiders Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 2 hours ago, TNucks1 said: JT Miller angry - https://streamable.com/lc0uqj Miller's a savage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now