-SN- Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 How would you grade the Canucks on 2019 free-agency acquisitions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post King Heffy Posted July 1, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted July 1, 2019 A. Already filled a hole in our top 6, and we have internal candidates for the other spot. Our D just got bigger, tougher, and more skilled. Very reasonable money and term for both guys. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 Getting Myers at the dollars, term, and conditions makes this July 1 a for certain A. Leafs, Jets, Columbus, Rags, Panthers are F. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 In seeing some of the other stuff, I'd like to change my grade from B to A please/thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naslund.is.king Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Getting Myers at the dollars, term, and conditions makes this July 1 a for certain A. Leafs, Jets, Columbus, Rags, Panthers are F. Sureeeee Alf...Find it awfully suspicious you're saying this when one person has voted F. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 A-, B+ A would have been signing Nyquist too. But oh well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hamhuis Hip Check Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 Considering what was available im extremely happy with this years adds, A grade from me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 if they can still pick up a guy like gusev, i’ld vote b+. otherwise a b. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VforVasili Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 I have never been so happy with Free Agency. They made real improvements and didn’t break the bank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 A for me. Benning stated a top 4 D and top 6 F were priorities and he got two very good ones. Yes it was for fair value and not steals, but look at some other teams who got worse today. With injury luck this team is a legit wild card team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted July 1, 2019 Share Posted July 1, 2019 A because this size and hitting will make our forwards play bigger and with more confidence. I like the price too. Tanev might last longer in this mix too if he stays. Plus I think players WANT to play here, it feels like. This indeed going to be an exciting year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
48MPHSlapShot Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 B. We filled some really significant holes on the back end, and did it for a better price than I think a lot of people had figured it would be. However, I can't give us an A because we weren't able to land a top 6 forward to play with Horvat because of cap issues. Still, it was overall a good day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted July 2, 2019 Share Posted July 2, 2019 7 hours ago, Ghostsof1915 said: A-, B+ A would have been signing Nyquist too. But oh well. this is how I see it too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted July 3, 2019 Share Posted July 3, 2019 Still hoping we can get Brock signed to something reasonable and take a run at Ferlund. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sparkle Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 tell us why you voted D E and F you cowards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts